{"title":"Association of allostatic load and dietary inflammatory index with depressive symptoms among U.S. adults: NHANES 2007-2018.","authors":"Baohua Zheng, Shufa Du, Mengna Wei, Wenqi Xia, Yanfen Jiang, Jiameng Zhou, Jianduan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both chronic stress and pro-inflammatory diets have been independently linked to depressive symptoms (DSs). However, their joint effects are uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 20,446 U.S. adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018. Chronic stress was quantified using allostatic load score (ALS) derived from eight biomarkers. Dietary inflammatory potential was quantified using Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) calculated from two 24-h dietary recalls. DSs were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic splines (RCS), mediation, and population attributable fraction (PAF) analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both ALS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.29) and DII (aOR = 1.21, 95%CI:1.15-1.26) independently and synergistically increased DSs risk, showing significant linear trends (both P-overall<0.001) with no evidence of nonlinearity. The highest-risk group (highest ALS quartile + pro-inflammatory diet) exhibited a 3.94-fold increased risk (aOR = 4.94, 95 % CI: 2.73-8.94) compared to the reference group. DII partially mediated the ALS-DSs association (mediation proportion: 4.27 %, 95 % CI: 2.96 %-6.00 %). Eliminating high ALS and pro-inflammatory diets could prevent 40.4 % (95 % CI: 31.7-49.2 %) of depression cases.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and residual confounding may exist due to unmeasured factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the independent, synergistic, and mediated effects of ALS and DII on DSs. Integrated interventions addressing both stress and diet may help mitigate depression burden in U.S. adult.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119955"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Both chronic stress and pro-inflammatory diets have been independently linked to depressive symptoms (DSs). However, their joint effects are uncertain.
Methods: This study included 20,446 U.S. adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018. Chronic stress was quantified using allostatic load score (ALS) derived from eight biomarkers. Dietary inflammatory potential was quantified using Dietary Inflammation Index (DII) calculated from two 24-h dietary recalls. DSs were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic splines (RCS), mediation, and population attributable fraction (PAF) analyses were conducted.
Results: Both ALS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.29) and DII (aOR = 1.21, 95%CI:1.15-1.26) independently and synergistically increased DSs risk, showing significant linear trends (both P-overall<0.001) with no evidence of nonlinearity. The highest-risk group (highest ALS quartile + pro-inflammatory diet) exhibited a 3.94-fold increased risk (aOR = 4.94, 95 % CI: 2.73-8.94) compared to the reference group. DII partially mediated the ALS-DSs association (mediation proportion: 4.27 %, 95 % CI: 2.96 %-6.00 %). Eliminating high ALS and pro-inflammatory diets could prevent 40.4 % (95 % CI: 31.7-49.2 %) of depression cases.
Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and residual confounding may exist due to unmeasured factors.
Conclusions: This study highlights the independent, synergistic, and mediated effects of ALS and DII on DSs. Integrated interventions addressing both stress and diet may help mitigate depression burden in U.S. adult.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.