Predicting diagnostic conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: A Bayesian hierarchical model approach using ADNI patient data.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Hugo Senra, Maria Conceição Costa, Isabel Pereira, Daniel Agostinho, Miguel Castelo-Branco
{"title":"Predicting diagnostic conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: A Bayesian hierarchical model approach using ADNI patient data.","authors":"Hugo Senra, Maria Conceição Costa, Isabel Pereira, Daniel Agostinho, Miguel Castelo-Branco","doi":"10.1177/13872877251360228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere is still need for a better understanding of which specific follow-up medical assessments might offer greater predictive value for diagnostic conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD).ObjectiveTo examine the longitudinal predictive importance of follow-up medical assessments to detect diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD.MethodsA sample of 572 participants from the ADNI database with valid data at baseline medical visit were included. Bayesian hierarchical models were employed to investigate longitudinal predictors of diagnostic conversion in a 36-month medical follow-up cohort, for measures of cognitive function, psychopathological symptoms, and demographical data. An additional 48-month medical follow-up cohort was considered to investigate the predictive importance of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (Aβ<sub>42</sub>/Aβ<sub>40</sub> ratio) for diagnostic conversion.ResultsMini-mental State Examination (MMSE) (β = -2.6; 95% HDI: [-3.6--1.5]) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (β = 5.6; 95% HDI: [4.3-7.0]) can predict diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD over a 36-month medical follow-up, with CDR-SB showing the greatest predictive importance in all Bayesian models. Higher scores on CDR-SB were associated with increased risk for a diagnosis conversion, approximately 30% greater probability at 24-month follow-up, and > 50% greater probability at 36-month follow-up.ConclusionsThe CDR-SB provides a reliable cognitive assessment to detect diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD over a period of 36 months, which is key to help clinicians screening for early diagnosis of AD using affordable non-invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251360228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251360228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is still need for a better understanding of which specific follow-up medical assessments might offer greater predictive value for diagnostic conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD).ObjectiveTo examine the longitudinal predictive importance of follow-up medical assessments to detect diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD.MethodsA sample of 572 participants from the ADNI database with valid data at baseline medical visit were included. Bayesian hierarchical models were employed to investigate longitudinal predictors of diagnostic conversion in a 36-month medical follow-up cohort, for measures of cognitive function, psychopathological symptoms, and demographical data. An additional 48-month medical follow-up cohort was considered to investigate the predictive importance of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio) for diagnostic conversion.ResultsMini-mental State Examination (MMSE) (β = -2.6; 95% HDI: [-3.6--1.5]) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) (β = 5.6; 95% HDI: [4.3-7.0]) can predict diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD over a 36-month medical follow-up, with CDR-SB showing the greatest predictive importance in all Bayesian models. Higher scores on CDR-SB were associated with increased risk for a diagnosis conversion, approximately 30% greater probability at 24-month follow-up, and > 50% greater probability at 36-month follow-up.ConclusionsThe CDR-SB provides a reliable cognitive assessment to detect diagnostic conversion from MCI to AD over a period of 36 months, which is key to help clinicians screening for early diagnosis of AD using affordable non-invasive procedures.

预测从轻度认知障碍到阿尔茨海默病的诊断转换:使用ADNI患者数据的贝叶斯分层模型方法
背景:对于从轻度认知障碍(MCI)到阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断转换,哪些具体的随访医学评估可能提供更大的预测价值,仍然需要更好的理解。目的探讨随访医学评估对MCI向AD诊断转化的纵向预测意义。方法从ADNI数据库中选取572名具有基线就诊有效资料的受试者。本研究采用贝叶斯分层模型,在为期36个月的医学随访队列中研究诊断转换的纵向预测因素,包括认知功能、精神病理症状和人口统计数据。另外一个48个月的医学随访队列被认为是为了研究脑脊液生物标志物(Aβ42/Aβ40比值)对诊断转换的预测重要性。结果最小精神状态检查(MMSE) (β = -2.6;95% HDI:[-3.6—1.5])和临床痴呆评定量表(CDR-SB) (β = 5.6;95% HDI:[4.3-7.0])可以在36个月的医学随访中预测从MCI到AD的诊断转换,CDR-SB在所有贝叶斯模型中显示出最大的预测重要性。CDR-SB得分越高,诊断转换的风险越高,24个月随访时的可能性增加30%,36个月随访时的可能性增加50%。结论CDR-SB提供了一个可靠的认知评估来检测从MCI到AD的诊断转换,这是帮助临床医生使用经济实惠的非侵入性手术筛查AD早期诊断的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信