Clinicopathological features of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions and diagnostic indicators for differentiating benign and malignant neoplasms.
Meng Xie, Jin Chen, Ya-Yan You, Zi-Xuan Su, Xi-Yin Zhu, Xing-Hua Wang, Peng-Cheng Li, Fa-Gang Jiang
{"title":"Clinicopathological features of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions and diagnostic indicators for differentiating benign and malignant neoplasms.","authors":"Meng Xie, Jin Chen, Ya-Yan You, Zi-Xuan Su, Xi-Yin Zhu, Xing-Hua Wang, Peng-Cheng Li, Fa-Gang Jiang","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2025.07.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinicopathological features of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions and identify key diagnostic indicators for differentiating benign and malignant neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective cohort study analyzed 74 histologically confirmed cases stratified by anatomical involvement at the Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020: Group A (orbital-nasal group, <i>n</i>=29), Group B (orbital-cranial group, <i>n</i>=27), and Group C (cranial-nasal-orbital group, <i>n</i>=18). Clinicopathological profiles including symptom presentation, histopathology, and invasion patterns were systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 49 (66.2%) benign and 25 (33.8%) malignant lesions. Compared with benign lesions, malignant lesions had a shorter onset time (12mo <i>vs</i> 2.5mo, <i>P</i>=0.004) and resulted in poorer vision (0.6 <i>vs</i> 1.53, <i>P</i>=0.025). Headache was reported in 28.6% of patients with benign lesions, but none in those with malignant lesions (<i>P</i>=0.002). Conjunctival congestion and edema were observed in 32.7% of patients with benign lesions and 60% of patients with malignant lesions (<i>P</i>=0.028). The ethmoid sinus was the most frequently invaded site (35 cases). Malignant lesions showed greater invasion in the nasal cavity (28.0% <i>vs</i> 0, <i>P</i>=0.000) and anterior cranial fossa (40.0% <i>vs</i> 8.2%, <i>P</i>=0.003) than benign lesions. The orbital-cranial group was more likely to invade through osseous foramina compared with the orbital-nasal group (<i>P</i>=0.002). Neurogenic tumors predominated benign cases (34.7%), whereas blood derived (28%) and glandular tumors (28%) were most prevalent in malignant subgroups. The proportion of malignant tumors in multi-disciplinary combined surgery was higher than that of benign lesions (61.5% <i>vs</i> 38.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malignant cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions exhibit distinct clinicopathological signatures characterized by rapid progression, aggressive anterior fossa and nasal region, and severe visual morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"18 7","pages":"1357-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.07.20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the clinicopathological features of cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions and identify key diagnostic indicators for differentiating benign and malignant neoplasms.
Methods: The retrospective cohort study analyzed 74 histologically confirmed cases stratified by anatomical involvement at the Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020: Group A (orbital-nasal group, n=29), Group B (orbital-cranial group, n=27), and Group C (cranial-nasal-orbital group, n=18). Clinicopathological profiles including symptom presentation, histopathology, and invasion patterns were systematically evaluated.
Results: The cohort comprised 49 (66.2%) benign and 25 (33.8%) malignant lesions. Compared with benign lesions, malignant lesions had a shorter onset time (12mo vs 2.5mo, P=0.004) and resulted in poorer vision (0.6 vs 1.53, P=0.025). Headache was reported in 28.6% of patients with benign lesions, but none in those with malignant lesions (P=0.002). Conjunctival congestion and edema were observed in 32.7% of patients with benign lesions and 60% of patients with malignant lesions (P=0.028). The ethmoid sinus was the most frequently invaded site (35 cases). Malignant lesions showed greater invasion in the nasal cavity (28.0% vs 0, P=0.000) and anterior cranial fossa (40.0% vs 8.2%, P=0.003) than benign lesions. The orbital-cranial group was more likely to invade through osseous foramina compared with the orbital-nasal group (P=0.002). Neurogenic tumors predominated benign cases (34.7%), whereas blood derived (28%) and glandular tumors (28%) were most prevalent in malignant subgroups. The proportion of malignant tumors in multi-disciplinary combined surgery was higher than that of benign lesions (61.5% vs 38.5%).
Conclusion: Malignant cranial-nasal-orbital communicating lesions exhibit distinct clinicopathological signatures characterized by rapid progression, aggressive anterior fossa and nasal region, and severe visual morbidity.
目的:探讨颅鼻眶交通病变的临床病理特点,探讨鉴别良恶性肿瘤的关键诊断指标。方法:回顾性队列研究分析2010年1月至2020年12月武汉协和医院按解剖受累分层的74例组织学确诊病例:A组(眶-鼻组,n=29), B组(眶-颅组,n=27), C组(颅-鼻-眶组,n=18)。临床病理特征包括症状表现、组织病理学和侵袭模式被系统地评估。结果:本组49例(66.2%)良性病变,25例(33.8%)恶性病变。与良性病变相比,恶性病变发病时间较短(12mo vs 2.5mo, P=0.004),视力较差(0.6 vs 1.53, P=0.025)。28.6%的良性病变患者出现头痛,而恶性病变患者没有出现头痛(P=0.002)。良性病变32.7%,恶性病变60%,结膜充血水肿(P=0.028)。筛窦是最常见的侵犯部位(35例)。恶性病变对鼻腔(28.0%比0,P=0.000)和前颅窝(40.0%比8.2%,P=0.003)的侵犯大于良性病变。眶-颅组较眶-鼻组更容易侵入骨孔(P=0.002)。良性病例以神经源性肿瘤为主(34.7%),恶性亚组以血源性肿瘤(28%)和腺源性肿瘤(28%)最为常见。多学科联合手术中恶性肿瘤的比例高于良性病变(61.5% vs 38.5%)。结论:恶性颅鼻眶交通病变具有明显的临床病理特征,其进展迅速,侵犯前窝和鼻区,严重的视觉损害。
期刊介绍:
· International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication
and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online).
This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from
WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed,
PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166.
IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific
Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO);
Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President,
Chinese Academy of Engineering.
International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of
blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of
AAO/PAAO) et al.
Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of
Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and
Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society).
Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press).
Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and
Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics).
Associate Editors-in-Chief include:
Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO);
Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ;
Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ;
Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA);
Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society);
Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA);
Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA).
IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles,
both basic and clinical papers.
Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome
Cooperation organization
International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.