Pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting outcomes in ECMO-bridged pediatric heart transplant recipients: experience from the largest pediatric heart transplant center in China.
{"title":"Pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting outcomes in ECMO-bridged pediatric heart transplant recipients: experience from the largest pediatric heart transplant center in China.","authors":"Wang-Zi Li, Xian-Ming Zhou, Wei Su, Cheng Zhou, Guo-Hua Wang, Jia-Wei Shi, Nian-Guo Dong","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1631616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advanced heart failure in children sometimes requires mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remaining a critical option despite its associated risks. The pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) may have potential in evaluating prognosis in ECMO-bridged candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>188 Children underwent orthotopic heart transplantation in Union hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 2018 and April 2025 were studied retrospectively, with 24 received ECMO assistance as a bridge to transplant. Patients were divided into two groups according to outcomes while discharged. Serial pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and other medical data during bridging were collected for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>66.7% of the 24 patients survived to discharge, with mortality linked to younger age (<i>p</i> = 0.034), higher pre-ECMO pSOFA scores (<i>p</i> = 0.019), and congenital heart disease. ECMO cannulation was mostly peripheral (66.7%), with left heart decompression in 87.5%. External cardiopulmonary resuscitation (50% of cases) increased mortality risk (<i>p</i> = 0.027). The death group had higher peak/trough/average pSOFA scores, reinforcing its predictive value. Non-survivors had more complications (ECMO reuse, septic shock, neurological issues) after heart transplant. pSOFA trends distinguished outcomes: survivors showed declining scores (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and average pSOFA ≤8 predicted better survival (<i>p</i> = 0.003). ECPR patients had worse baselines but might recover with optimized management. Findings support pSOFA-guided risk stratification in ECMO-bridged HTx.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous pSOFA monitoring effectively risk-stratifies ECMO-bridged pediatric transplant candidates, identifying high-risk patients after transplant. Planned ECMO initiation yields better outcomes than ECPR. These findings warrant prospective validation to optimize bridging strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1631616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1631616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Advanced heart failure in children sometimes requires mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remaining a critical option despite its associated risks. The pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) may have potential in evaluating prognosis in ECMO-bridged candidates.
Methods: 188 Children underwent orthotopic heart transplantation in Union hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 2018 and April 2025 were studied retrospectively, with 24 received ECMO assistance as a bridge to transplant. Patients were divided into two groups according to outcomes while discharged. Serial pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and other medical data during bridging were collected for comparison.
Results: 66.7% of the 24 patients survived to discharge, with mortality linked to younger age (p = 0.034), higher pre-ECMO pSOFA scores (p = 0.019), and congenital heart disease. ECMO cannulation was mostly peripheral (66.7%), with left heart decompression in 87.5%. External cardiopulmonary resuscitation (50% of cases) increased mortality risk (p = 0.027). The death group had higher peak/trough/average pSOFA scores, reinforcing its predictive value. Non-survivors had more complications (ECMO reuse, septic shock, neurological issues) after heart transplant. pSOFA trends distinguished outcomes: survivors showed declining scores (p = 0.006), and average pSOFA ≤8 predicted better survival (p = 0.003). ECPR patients had worse baselines but might recover with optimized management. Findings support pSOFA-guided risk stratification in ECMO-bridged HTx.
Conclusion: Continuous pSOFA monitoring effectively risk-stratifies ECMO-bridged pediatric transplant candidates, identifying high-risk patients after transplant. Planned ECMO initiation yields better outcomes than ECPR. These findings warrant prospective validation to optimize bridging strategies.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world