Pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting outcomes in ECMO-bridged pediatric heart transplant recipients: experience from the largest pediatric heart transplant center in China.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1631616
Wang-Zi Li, Xian-Ming Zhou, Wei Su, Cheng Zhou, Guo-Hua Wang, Jia-Wei Shi, Nian-Guo Dong
{"title":"Pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting outcomes in ECMO-bridged pediatric heart transplant recipients: experience from the largest pediatric heart transplant center in China.","authors":"Wang-Zi Li, Xian-Ming Zhou, Wei Su, Cheng Zhou, Guo-Hua Wang, Jia-Wei Shi, Nian-Guo Dong","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1631616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advanced heart failure in children sometimes requires mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remaining a critical option despite its associated risks. The pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) may have potential in evaluating prognosis in ECMO-bridged candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>188 Children underwent orthotopic heart transplantation in Union hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 2018 and April 2025 were studied retrospectively, with 24 received ECMO assistance as a bridge to transplant. Patients were divided into two groups according to outcomes while discharged. Serial pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and other medical data during bridging were collected for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>66.7% of the 24 patients survived to discharge, with mortality linked to younger age (<i>p</i> = 0.034), higher pre-ECMO pSOFA scores (<i>p</i> = 0.019), and congenital heart disease. ECMO cannulation was mostly peripheral (66.7%), with left heart decompression in 87.5%. External cardiopulmonary resuscitation (50% of cases) increased mortality risk (<i>p</i> = 0.027). The death group had higher peak/trough/average pSOFA scores, reinforcing its predictive value. Non-survivors had more complications (ECMO reuse, septic shock, neurological issues) after heart transplant. pSOFA trends distinguished outcomes: survivors showed declining scores (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and average pSOFA ≤8 predicted better survival (<i>p</i> = 0.003). ECPR patients had worse baselines but might recover with optimized management. Findings support pSOFA-guided risk stratification in ECMO-bridged HTx.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous pSOFA monitoring effectively risk-stratifies ECMO-bridged pediatric transplant candidates, identifying high-risk patients after transplant. Planned ECMO initiation yields better outcomes than ECPR. These findings warrant prospective validation to optimize bridging strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1631616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1631616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advanced heart failure in children sometimes requires mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remaining a critical option despite its associated risks. The pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) may have potential in evaluating prognosis in ECMO-bridged candidates.

Methods: 188 Children underwent orthotopic heart transplantation in Union hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 2018 and April 2025 were studied retrospectively, with 24 received ECMO assistance as a bridge to transplant. Patients were divided into two groups according to outcomes while discharged. Serial pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and other medical data during bridging were collected for comparison.

Results: 66.7% of the 24 patients survived to discharge, with mortality linked to younger age (p = 0.034), higher pre-ECMO pSOFA scores (p = 0.019), and congenital heart disease. ECMO cannulation was mostly peripheral (66.7%), with left heart decompression in 87.5%. External cardiopulmonary resuscitation (50% of cases) increased mortality risk (p = 0.027). The death group had higher peak/trough/average pSOFA scores, reinforcing its predictive value. Non-survivors had more complications (ECMO reuse, septic shock, neurological issues) after heart transplant. pSOFA trends distinguished outcomes: survivors showed declining scores (p = 0.006), and average pSOFA ≤8 predicted better survival (p = 0.003). ECPR patients had worse baselines but might recover with optimized management. Findings support pSOFA-guided risk stratification in ECMO-bridged HTx.

Conclusion: Continuous pSOFA monitoring effectively risk-stratifies ECMO-bridged pediatric transplant candidates, identifying high-risk patients after transplant. Planned ECMO initiation yields better outcomes than ECPR. These findings warrant prospective validation to optimize bridging strategies.

预测ecmo桥接儿童心脏移植受者预后的儿童序贯器官衰竭评估:来自中国最大的儿童心脏移植中心的经验
目的:儿童晚期心力衰竭有时需要机械循环支持作为移植的桥梁,体外膜氧合(ECMO)仍然是一个关键的选择,尽管它存在相关风险。儿童序贯器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)可能具有评估ecmo桥接患者预后的潜力。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2025年4月在华中科技大学同济医学院协和医院行原位心脏移植的188例患儿,其中24例接受ECMO辅助作为移植的桥梁。根据出院情况将患者分为两组。收集接桥期间的儿童序贯器官衰竭评估和其他医疗数据进行比较。结果:24例患者中有66.7%存活至出院,死亡率与年龄较小(p = 0.034)、ecmo前pSOFA评分较高(p = 0.019)和先天性心脏病有关。ECMO插管以外周为主(66.7%),左心减压占87.5%。体外心肺复苏(50%的病例)增加死亡风险(p = 0.027)。死亡组pSOFA评分的峰值/低谷/平均值较高,增强了其预测价值。非幸存者在心脏移植后出现更多并发症(ECMO重复使用、感染性休克、神经问题)。pSOFA趋势可区分预后:幸存者评分下降(p = 0.006),平均pSOFA≤8预示更好的生存(p = 0.003)。ECPR患者的基线较差,但通过优化管理可能会恢复。研究结果支持psofa引导的ecmo桥接HTx风险分层。结论:持续pSOFA监测可有效地对ecmo桥接的儿童移植候选人进行风险分层,识别移植后的高危患者。计划ECMO启动的效果优于ECPR。这些发现保证了优化桥接策略的前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信