A Machine-Learning Model for the Prediction of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Multiparameter MRI.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S513779
Yuxin Cai, Yanbo Li, Wenqi Wang, Yaqiu Zhou, Jingbo Wang, Lina Zhang, Hong Lu
{"title":"A Machine-Learning Model for the Prediction of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Multiparameter MRI.","authors":"Yuxin Cai, Yanbo Li, Wenqi Wang, Yaqiu Zhou, Jingbo Wang, Lina Zhang, Hong Lu","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S513779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the difference between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC) based on multi-parametric MRI imaging features and construct a prediction model to identify TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study enrolled 1353 women with 1376 malignant lesions who had no additional therapy before surgery between January 2019 and December 2020 in a single center. The images were accessed according to BI-RADS-MR<sup>®</sup> (fifth ed.) atlas. The lesions were classified as TNBC group and non-TNBC and then randomly divided into a primary cohort (n = 963) and a validation cohort (n = 413) at a ratio of 7:3. In the primary cohort, univariate analysis, logistic regression analysis and Boruta algorithm were used to determine the independent predictors for TNBC and non-TNBC. The machine learning classifier XGboost was developed based on the features to predict TNBC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was applied to evaluate the model prediction ability. The diagnostic performances of the model were evaluated in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Necrosis, edema, the maximum diameter of lesions, enhancement ratio in each phase, time to peak, gland enhancement ratio, wash-in slope and the number and diameter of the vessels were independent predictors predicting TNBC. The AUCs of the model were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.758-0.832) and 0.705 (95% CI: 0.640-0.770) in the primary cohort and validation cohort, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model based on multiparameter MRI has good predictive ability and can be used to predict the probability of TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"611-625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S513779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the difference between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC) based on multi-parametric MRI imaging features and construct a prediction model to identify TNBC.

Methods: A retrospective study enrolled 1353 women with 1376 malignant lesions who had no additional therapy before surgery between January 2019 and December 2020 in a single center. The images were accessed according to BI-RADS-MR® (fifth ed.) atlas. The lesions were classified as TNBC group and non-TNBC and then randomly divided into a primary cohort (n = 963) and a validation cohort (n = 413) at a ratio of 7:3. In the primary cohort, univariate analysis, logistic regression analysis and Boruta algorithm were used to determine the independent predictors for TNBC and non-TNBC. The machine learning classifier XGboost was developed based on the features to predict TNBC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was applied to evaluate the model prediction ability. The diagnostic performances of the model were evaluated in the validation cohort.

Results: Necrosis, edema, the maximum diameter of lesions, enhancement ratio in each phase, time to peak, gland enhancement ratio, wash-in slope and the number and diameter of the vessels were independent predictors predicting TNBC. The AUCs of the model were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.758-0.832) and 0.705 (95% CI: 0.640-0.770) in the primary cohort and validation cohort, respectively.

Conclusion: The model based on multiparameter MRI has good predictive ability and can be used to predict the probability of TNBC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于多参数MRI预测三阴性乳腺癌的机器学习模型。
目的:探讨基于多参数MRI影像特征的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)与非三阴性乳腺癌(non-TNBC)的差异,构建识别TNBC的预测模型。方法:一项回顾性研究,在2019年1月至2020年12月期间,在单一中心招募了1353名女性,共1376例恶性病变,术前未接受任何额外治疗。根据BI-RADS-MR®(第五版)图集获取图像。将病变分为TNBC组和非TNBC组,然后按7:3的比例随机分为原发性队列(n = 963)和验证队列(n = 413)。在主要队列中,采用单因素分析、logistic回归分析和Boruta算法确定TNBC和非TNBC的独立预测因子。基于这些特征开发了机器学习分类器XGboost来预测TNBC。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的预测能力。在验证队列中评估该模型的诊断性能。结果:坏死、水肿、病变最大直径、各期增强比、峰值时间、腺体增强比、冲洗斜率、血管数量和直径是预测TNBC的独立预测指标。在主要队列和验证队列中,模型的auc分别为0.795 (95% CI: 0.758-0.832)和0.705 (95% CI: 0.64 -0.770)。结论:基于多参数MRI的模型具有较好的预测能力,可用于预测TNBC的发生概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信