Deep Neuromuscular Block with Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-150995
Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mohammed Said ElSharkawy, Reda Khalil Abdelrahman, Abdallah Elabd Hassan, Mohammed Gaber Ibrahim Saad, Ismail Ahmed Elzoughari, Abdelkarem Hussini Ismail Alsayed, Asmaa Abdelbadie, Rehab Abd El Fattah Helal
{"title":"Deep Neuromuscular Block with Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim, Mohammed Said ElSharkawy, Reda Khalil Abdelrahman, Abdallah Elabd Hassan, Mohammed Gaber Ibrahim Saad, Ismail Ahmed Elzoughari, Abdelkarem Hussini Ismail Alsayed, Asmaa Abdelbadie, Rehab Abd El Fattah Helal","doi":"10.5812/aapm-150995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management remains a challenge in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in conjunction with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum )PP) on postoperative pain, surgical parameters, and recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled double-blind study included 44 participants undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized equally into two groups (22 each): Group D received deep NMB, while group M received moderate NMB using cis-atracurium, through the utilization of computer-generated random numbers enclosed within sealed, opaque envelopes, following a parallel approach. Regarding deep NMB, following an initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, a continuous infusion of 0.06 - 0.12 mg/kg/hr was administered to maintain a post-tetanic count between 1 and 2, with low PP pressure of 10 - 12 mmHg. Conversely, for moderate NMB, after the same initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, the continuous infusion commenced upon the train-of-four count returning to 2, with the rate adjusted to sustain a count between 1 and 3, and standard PP pressure of 15 mmHg. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity measured by NRS scores from 2 hours to 48 hours post-surgery, time to first analgesic administration, cumulative opioid consumption within the initial 48-hour postoperative period, and patient-reported satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Statistical analysis using SPSS v26 included tests for normality (Shapiro-Wilks), with parametric data analyzed by <i>t</i>-test, non-parametric data by Mann-Whitney, and qualitative data by chi-square/Fisher's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group D experienced a considerably longer time until the first analgesic rescue compared to group M (9.82 ± 1.5 hours vs. 7.23 ± 1.19 hours, P < 0.001). Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours was lower in Group D (10.77 ± 1.51 mg vs. 13.09 ± 1.74 mg, P < 0.001). At 6, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively, group D exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P < 0.05). Surgical duration, surgical field quality, complication rates, and patient satisfaction were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep NMB combined with low-pressure PP provided superior postoperative analgesia without compromising surgical field quality or increasing complications in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"14 5","pages":"e150995"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-150995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain management remains a challenge in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in conjunction with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum )PP) on postoperative pain, surgical parameters, and recovery outcomes.

Methods: This randomized controlled double-blind study included 44 participants undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized equally into two groups (22 each): Group D received deep NMB, while group M received moderate NMB using cis-atracurium, through the utilization of computer-generated random numbers enclosed within sealed, opaque envelopes, following a parallel approach. Regarding deep NMB, following an initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, a continuous infusion of 0.06 - 0.12 mg/kg/hr was administered to maintain a post-tetanic count between 1 and 2, with low PP pressure of 10 - 12 mmHg. Conversely, for moderate NMB, after the same initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, the continuous infusion commenced upon the train-of-four count returning to 2, with the rate adjusted to sustain a count between 1 and 3, and standard PP pressure of 15 mmHg. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included postoperative pain intensity measured by NRS scores from 2 hours to 48 hours post-surgery, time to first analgesic administration, cumulative opioid consumption within the initial 48-hour postoperative period, and patient-reported satisfaction with postoperative pain management. Statistical analysis using SPSS v26 included tests for normality (Shapiro-Wilks), with parametric data analyzed by t-test, non-parametric data by Mann-Whitney, and qualitative data by chi-square/Fisher's test.

Results: Group D experienced a considerably longer time until the first analgesic rescue compared to group M (9.82 ± 1.5 hours vs. 7.23 ± 1.19 hours, P < 0.001). Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours was lower in Group D (10.77 ± 1.51 mg vs. 13.09 ± 1.74 mg, P < 0.001). At 6, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively, group D exhibited significantly lower pain scores (P < 0.05). Surgical duration, surgical field quality, complication rates, and patient satisfaction were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: Deep NMB combined with low-pressure PP provided superior postoperative analgesia without compromising surgical field quality or increasing complications in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

深度神经肌肉阻滞与低压气腹在腹腔镜腹部手术:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在腹腔镜腹部手术中,术后疼痛管理仍然是一个挑战。目的:本研究的目的是确定深度神经肌肉阻断(NMB)联合低压气腹(PP)对术后疼痛、手术参数和恢复结果的影响。方法:这项随机对照双盲研究包括44名接受腹腔镜腹部手术的参与者。患者被随机分为两组(每组22人):D组接受深度NMB, M组使用顺式阿特曲库铵接受中度NMB,采用平行方法,使用计算机生成的随机数封装在密封的、不透明的信封中。对于深部NMB,初始剂量为0.15 mg/kg后,连续输注0.06 - 0.12 mg/kg/hr,以维持破伤风后计数在1至2之间,PP压低至10 - 12 mmHg。相反,对于中度NMB,在相同的初始剂量为0.15 mg/kg后,在四列计数恢复到2时开始持续输注,并调整速率以维持计数在1到3之间,标准PP压力为15 mmHg。主要终点是麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的数值评定量表(NRS)评分测量的术后疼痛强度。次要结局包括术后2小时至48小时的NRS评分测量的术后疼痛强度,到第一次给药的时间,术后最初48小时内阿片类药物的累积消耗,以及患者报告的术后疼痛管理满意度。统计分析采用SPSS v26进行正态性检验(Shapiro-Wilks),参数数据采用t检验,非参数数据采用Mann-Whitney检验,定性数据采用卡方/费雪检验。结果:与M组相比,D组距第一次镇痛抢救时间明显更长(9.82±1.5小时比7.23±1.19小时,P < 0.001)。D组前24 h吗啡用量较低(10.77±1.51 mg vs. 13.09±1.74 mg, P < 0.001)。术后6、8、12 h, D组疼痛评分明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组间手术时间、手术野质量、并发症发生率和患者满意度具有可比性。结论:在腹腔镜腹部手术中,深度NMB联合低压PP在不影响手术视野质量或增加并发症的情况下提供了良好的术后镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信