Patient-Reported Psychosocial Burdens and Quality of Life and Work Productivity Impacts Among Patients with Clinically Distinct Alopecia Areata Severity Profiles
Kent A. Hanson, Jenny Austin, Nicola Clayton, Peter Anderson, Sergio Vano-Galvan, Simran Marwaha, Samantha K. Kurosky, Alexandre Lejeune, James Piercy, Ernest H. Law
{"title":"Patient-Reported Psychosocial Burdens and Quality of Life and Work Productivity Impacts Among Patients with Clinically Distinct Alopecia Areata Severity Profiles","authors":"Kent A. Hanson, Jenny Austin, Nicola Clayton, Peter Anderson, Sergio Vano-Galvan, Simran Marwaha, Samantha K. Kurosky, Alexandre Lejeune, James Piercy, Ernest H. Law","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Alopecia areata (AA) may negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL), disease perception, and work productivity. AA severity is not solely based on scalp hair loss; individuals with AA can experience psychosocial burdens, including emotional symptoms and activity limitations (ES/AL). Our objective was to identify discrete AA severity profiles and evaluate the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dermatologist and patient surveys from the Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were analyzed. PRO instruments included the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO), Work Productivity Activity Index—AA, Skindex-16 AA, Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Latent class analysis identified distinct classes using the AAPPO hair loss, ES, and AL response options.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A 5-class model was selected. Each class exhibited distinct profiles based on patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL burden: (1) very mild hair loss, very mild ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 175); (2) mild hair loss, mild ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 165); (3) moderate hair loss, very severe ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 111); (4) severe hair loss, moderate ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 52); and (5) very severe hair loss, severe ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 33). Class 3 reported significantly more overall work impairment [<i>β</i> = 16.3 (95% CI, 7.8–24.7)] than class 1. Overall Skindex-16 AA scores were highest for class 3 [<i>β</i> = 38.7 (95% CI, 33.3–44.2)]. Class 3 reported significantly more HADS anxiety [<i>β</i> = 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9–7.0)] and depression [<i>β</i> = 5.7 (95% CI, 4.6–6.9)] than class 1. Across all P-Sat domains, class 5 reported the least satisfaction with therapy.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Generally, patients with more severe patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL had decreased QoL and satisfaction with care and greater work productivity impairment. Although class 3 had moderate patient-reported hair loss, patients experienced the most severe ES/AL burden, suggesting that AA impacts well-being and daily activities in patients with less extensive hair loss.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 9","pages":"4556 - 4570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Alopecia areata (AA) may negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL), disease perception, and work productivity. AA severity is not solely based on scalp hair loss; individuals with AA can experience psychosocial burdens, including emotional symptoms and activity limitations (ES/AL). Our objective was to identify discrete AA severity profiles and evaluate the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Methods
Dermatologist and patient surveys from the Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were analyzed. PRO instruments included the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO), Work Productivity Activity Index—AA, Skindex-16 AA, Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Latent class analysis identified distinct classes using the AAPPO hair loss, ES, and AL response options.
Results
A 5-class model was selected. Each class exhibited distinct profiles based on patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL burden: (1) very mild hair loss, very mild ES/AL (n = 175); (2) mild hair loss, mild ES/AL (n = 165); (3) moderate hair loss, very severe ES/AL (n = 111); (4) severe hair loss, moderate ES/AL (n = 52); and (5) very severe hair loss, severe ES/AL (n = 33). Class 3 reported significantly more overall work impairment [β = 16.3 (95% CI, 7.8–24.7)] than class 1. Overall Skindex-16 AA scores were highest for class 3 [β = 38.7 (95% CI, 33.3–44.2)]. Class 3 reported significantly more HADS anxiety [β = 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9–7.0)] and depression [β = 5.7 (95% CI, 4.6–6.9)] than class 1. Across all P-Sat domains, class 5 reported the least satisfaction with therapy.
Conclusion
Generally, patients with more severe patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL had decreased QoL and satisfaction with care and greater work productivity impairment. Although class 3 had moderate patient-reported hair loss, patients experienced the most severe ES/AL burden, suggesting that AA impacts well-being and daily activities in patients with less extensive hair loss.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.