Patient-Reported Psychosocial Burdens and Quality of Life and Work Productivity Impacts Among Patients with Clinically Distinct Alopecia Areata Severity Profiles

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Kent A. Hanson, Jenny Austin, Nicola Clayton, Peter Anderson, Sergio Vano-Galvan, Simran Marwaha, Samantha K. Kurosky, Alexandre Lejeune, James Piercy, Ernest H. Law
{"title":"Patient-Reported Psychosocial Burdens and Quality of Life and Work Productivity Impacts Among Patients with Clinically Distinct Alopecia Areata Severity Profiles","authors":"Kent A. Hanson,&nbsp;Jenny Austin,&nbsp;Nicola Clayton,&nbsp;Peter Anderson,&nbsp;Sergio Vano-Galvan,&nbsp;Simran Marwaha,&nbsp;Samantha K. Kurosky,&nbsp;Alexandre Lejeune,&nbsp;James Piercy,&nbsp;Ernest H. Law","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Alopecia areata (AA) may negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL), disease perception, and work productivity. AA severity is not solely based on scalp hair loss; individuals with AA can experience psychosocial burdens, including emotional symptoms and activity limitations (ES/AL). Our objective was to identify discrete AA severity profiles and evaluate the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dermatologist and patient surveys from the Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were analyzed. PRO instruments included the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO), Work Productivity Activity Index—AA, Skindex-16 AA, Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Latent class analysis identified distinct classes using the AAPPO hair loss, ES, and AL response options.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A 5-class model was selected. Each class exhibited distinct profiles based on patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL burden: (1) very mild hair loss, very mild ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 175); (2) mild hair loss, mild ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 165); (3) moderate hair loss, very severe ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 111); (4) severe hair loss, moderate ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 52); and (5) very severe hair loss, severe ES/AL (<i>n</i> = 33). Class 3 reported significantly more overall work impairment [<i>β</i> = 16.3 (95% CI, 7.8–24.7)] than class 1. Overall Skindex-16 AA scores were highest for class 3 [<i>β</i> = 38.7 (95% CI, 33.3–44.2)]. Class 3 reported significantly more HADS anxiety [<i>β</i> = 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9–7.0)] and depression [<i>β</i> = 5.7 (95% CI, 4.6–6.9)] than class 1. Across all P-Sat domains, class 5 reported the least satisfaction with therapy.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Generally, patients with more severe patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL had decreased QoL and satisfaction with care and greater work productivity impairment. Although class 3 had moderate patient-reported hair loss, patients experienced the most severe ES/AL burden, suggesting that AA impacts well-being and daily activities in patients with less extensive hair loss.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 9","pages":"4556 - 4570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03302-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Alopecia areata (AA) may negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL), disease perception, and work productivity. AA severity is not solely based on scalp hair loss; individuals with AA can experience psychosocial burdens, including emotional symptoms and activity limitations (ES/AL). Our objective was to identify discrete AA severity profiles and evaluate the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

Dermatologist and patient surveys from the Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were analyzed. PRO instruments included the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO), Work Productivity Activity Index—AA, Skindex-16 AA, Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Latent class analysis identified distinct classes using the AAPPO hair loss, ES, and AL response options.

Results

A 5-class model was selected. Each class exhibited distinct profiles based on patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL burden: (1) very mild hair loss, very mild ES/AL (n = 175); (2) mild hair loss, mild ES/AL (n = 165); (3) moderate hair loss, very severe ES/AL (n = 111); (4) severe hair loss, moderate ES/AL (n = 52); and (5) very severe hair loss, severe ES/AL (n = 33). Class 3 reported significantly more overall work impairment [β = 16.3 (95% CI, 7.8–24.7)] than class 1. Overall Skindex-16 AA scores were highest for class 3 [β = 38.7 (95% CI, 33.3–44.2)]. Class 3 reported significantly more HADS anxiety [β = 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9–7.0)] and depression [β = 5.7 (95% CI, 4.6–6.9)] than class 1. Across all P-Sat domains, class 5 reported the least satisfaction with therapy.

Conclusion

Generally, patients with more severe patient-reported hair loss and ES/AL had decreased QoL and satisfaction with care and greater work productivity impairment. Although class 3 had moderate patient-reported hair loss, patients experienced the most severe ES/AL burden, suggesting that AA impacts well-being and daily activities in patients with less extensive hair loss.

临床不同斑秃严重程度患者报告的心理社会负担、生活质量和工作效率影响
斑秃(AA)可能会对患者的生活质量(QoL)、疾病认知和工作效率产生负面影响。AA的严重程度不仅仅是基于头皮脱发;嗜酒成瘾者可能会经历心理社会负担,包括情绪症状和活动限制(ES/AL)。我们的目的是确定离散的AA严重程度概况,并评估与患者报告结果(PROs)的关系。方法:对来自法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国斑秃疾病专项计划的皮肤科医生和患者调查进行分析。PRO工具包括斑秃患者优先结局(AAPPO)、工作效率活动指数-AA、皮肤指数- 16aa、患者对头发生长的满意度(P-Sat)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)。潜在类别分析使用AAPPO脱发,ES和AL反应选项确定了不同的类别。结果:选择了5级模型。根据患者报告的脱发和ES/AL负担,每个类别表现出不同的特征:(1)非常轻度的脱发,非常轻度的ES/AL (n = 175);②轻度脱发,轻度ES/AL (n = 165);(3)中度脱发,非常严重的ES/AL (n = 111);(4)重度脱发,中度ES/AL (n = 52);(5)非常严重的脱发,严重ES/AL (n = 33)。第3类报告的总体工作障碍明显多于第1类[β = 16.3 (95% CI, 7.8-24.7)]。3级患者的总体Skindex-16 AA评分最高[β = 38.7 (95% CI, 33.3-44.2)]。3级报告的HADS焦虑[β = 6.0 (95% CI, 4.9-7.0)]和抑郁[β = 5.7 (95% CI, 4.6-6.9)]明显多于1级。在所有P-Sat域中,第5级报告对治疗的满意度最低。结论:一般来说,患者报告的脱发和ES/AL越严重,患者的生活质量和护理满意度越低,工作效率受损越大。虽然3级患者报告的脱发程度中等,但患者经历了最严重的ES/AL负担,这表明AA对脱发程度较轻的患者的健康和日常活动有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信