Long-term oncologic benefit of postoperative chemotherapy in the resected ampulla of Vater cancer: hope or hype? A propensity score matching analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jae Hwan Jeong, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Kyung Sik Kim, Chang Moo Kang
{"title":"Long-term oncologic benefit of postoperative chemotherapy in the resected ampulla of Vater cancer: hope or hype? A propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Jae Hwan Jeong, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Kyung Sik Kim, Chang Moo Kang","doi":"10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The oncologic benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected ampulla of Vater cancer (AoVCa) remain contentious. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic effects of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PACT) in patients who underwent radical surgery for AoVCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2019, clinical and pathological data of 306 AoVCa patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the PACT (+) and PACT (-) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PACT (+) group (n = 124) and PACT (-) group (n = 182) showed significant differences in cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and cancer differentiation. Lower overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) were observed in the PACT (+) group. After PSM, no significant differences in OS or DFS were found between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis and perineural invasion as significant prognostic factors, while PACT did not significantly impact long-term survival. Paradoxically, PACT was associated with worse outcomes in patients with favorable prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that PACT does not provide a clear oncologic benefit for resected AoVCa patients and may even be detrimental for those with favorable prognostic factors. There is an urgent need to develop effective anticancer treatments and consider tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual patient profiles. Future research should focus on long-term follow-up and the integration of precision medicine to improve outcomes for AoVCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"109 1","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The oncologic benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected ampulla of Vater cancer (AoVCa) remain contentious. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic effects of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PACT) in patients who underwent radical surgery for AoVCa.

Methods: From 2005 to 2019, clinical and pathological data of 306 AoVCa patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into the PACT (+) and PACT (-) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for clinical factors.

Results: The PACT (+) group (n = 124) and PACT (-) group (n = 182) showed significant differences in cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and cancer differentiation. Lower overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001) were observed in the PACT (+) group. After PSM, no significant differences in OS or DFS were found between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis and perineural invasion as significant prognostic factors, while PACT did not significantly impact long-term survival. Paradoxically, PACT was associated with worse outcomes in patients with favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusion: This study suggests that PACT does not provide a clear oncologic benefit for resected AoVCa patients and may even be detrimental for those with favorable prognostic factors. There is an urgent need to develop effective anticancer treatments and consider tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual patient profiles. Future research should focus on long-term follow-up and the integration of precision medicine to improve outcomes for AoVCa patients.

壶腹癌切除后化疗的长期肿瘤学效益:希望还是炒作?倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:壶腹切除癌(AoVCa)辅助化疗的肿瘤学益处仍有争议。本研究旨在评估AoVCa根治性手术患者术后辅助化疗(PACT)的长期肿瘤学影响。方法:回顾性分析2005 ~ 2019年306例行胰十二指肠切除术的AoVCa患者的临床及病理资料。患者分为PACT(+)组和PACT(-)组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整临床因素。结果:PACT(+)组(n = 124)与PACT(-)组(n = 182)在肿瘤分期、淋巴结转移、神经周围浸润、淋巴血管浸润、肿瘤分化等方面均有显著差异。PACT(+)组总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)均较低(P < 0.001)。PSM后,各组间OS和DFS无显著差异。多因素分析发现淋巴结转移和神经周围浸润是重要的预后因素,而PACT对长期生存没有显著影响。矛盾的是,在预后有利的患者中,PACT与较差的预后相关。结论:本研究表明,PACT并不能为切除的AoVCa患者提供明确的肿瘤学益处,甚至可能对预后有利的患者有害。迫切需要开发有效的抗癌治疗方法,并考虑根据个体患者的情况量身定制治疗方法。未来的研究应注重长期随访和精准医学的结合,以改善AoVCa患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信