Na Reum Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Sub Choi, Dai Hoon Han
{"title":"Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Na Reum Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Sub Choi, Dai Hoon Han","doi":"10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the widening of the donor pool to include patients with steatosis, small-for-size grafts, and older patients, this study examined the effect of age on liver volumetric regeneration after a donor right hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 33 older (≥55 years) and 277 younger (<30 years) donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between March 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score-matched analysis, the perioperative surgical outcomes and growth rates of the remnant liver in 63 younger and 32 older donors were compared. Liver regeneration was assessed using CT volumetry for up to 6 months after surgery. Poor liver regeneration was defined as restoration of less than 80% of the original liver volume. The risk factors for poor liver regeneration were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of older and younger donors was 58.0 and 24.3 years, respectively. Despite comparable preoperative factors, older donors showed significantly lower regeneration rates at all observed time points (1 month: 75.5% <i>vs.</i> 82.3%, P = 0.001; 3 months: 80.4% <i>vs.</i> 90.5%, P < 0.001; and 6 months: 87.9% <i>vs.</i> 95.8, P = 0.006, compared to total liver volume). A large total liver volume and older age were identified as risk factors for poor liver regeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older donors showed a reduced capacity for liver regeneration. This finding suggests the need for the development of more conservative criteria for residual liver volume in older donors than for younger donors to ensure donor safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"109 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Given the widening of the donor pool to include patients with steatosis, small-for-size grafts, and older patients, this study examined the effect of age on liver volumetric regeneration after a donor right hepatectomy.
Methods: We enrolled 33 older (≥55 years) and 277 younger (<30 years) donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between March 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score-matched analysis, the perioperative surgical outcomes and growth rates of the remnant liver in 63 younger and 32 older donors were compared. Liver regeneration was assessed using CT volumetry for up to 6 months after surgery. Poor liver regeneration was defined as restoration of less than 80% of the original liver volume. The risk factors for poor liver regeneration were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model.
Results: The mean age of older and younger donors was 58.0 and 24.3 years, respectively. Despite comparable preoperative factors, older donors showed significantly lower regeneration rates at all observed time points (1 month: 75.5% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.001; 3 months: 80.4% vs. 90.5%, P < 0.001; and 6 months: 87.9% vs. 95.8, P = 0.006, compared to total liver volume). A large total liver volume and older age were identified as risk factors for poor liver regeneration.
Conclusion: Older donors showed a reduced capacity for liver regeneration. This finding suggests the need for the development of more conservative criteria for residual liver volume in older donors than for younger donors to ensure donor safety.
目的:考虑到供体池的扩大,包括脂肪变性患者、小尺寸移植物患者和老年患者,本研究探讨了年龄对供体右肝切除术后肝脏体积再生的影响。方法:我们招募了33名老年人(≥55岁)和277名年轻人(结果:老年人和年轻人的平均年龄分别为58.0岁和24.3岁)。尽管术前因素具有可比性,但老年供体在所有观察时间点的再生率都明显较低(1个月:75.5% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.001;3个月:80.4% vs. 90.5%, P < 0.001;6个月:87.9% vs. 95.8, P = 0.006)。肝总容量大和年龄大被认为是肝再生不良的危险因素。结论:老年供体肝脏再生能力下降。这一发现表明,为确保供体安全,老年供体的剩余肝容量需要制定比年轻供体更保守的标准。
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).