Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Na Reum Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Sub Choi, Dai Hoon Han
{"title":"Age-related impact on liver regeneration in older donors after living-donor right hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Na Reum Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Sub Choi, Dai Hoon Han","doi":"10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the widening of the donor pool to include patients with steatosis, small-for-size grafts, and older patients, this study examined the effect of age on liver volumetric regeneration after a donor right hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 33 older (≥55 years) and 277 younger (<30 years) donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between March 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score-matched analysis, the perioperative surgical outcomes and growth rates of the remnant liver in 63 younger and 32 older donors were compared. Liver regeneration was assessed using CT volumetry for up to 6 months after surgery. Poor liver regeneration was defined as restoration of less than 80% of the original liver volume. The risk factors for poor liver regeneration were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of older and younger donors was 58.0 and 24.3 years, respectively. Despite comparable preoperative factors, older donors showed significantly lower regeneration rates at all observed time points (1 month: 75.5% <i>vs.</i> 82.3%, P = 0.001; 3 months: 80.4% <i>vs.</i> 90.5%, P < 0.001; and 6 months: 87.9% <i>vs.</i> 95.8, P = 0.006, compared to total liver volume). A large total liver volume and older age were identified as risk factors for poor liver regeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older donors showed a reduced capacity for liver regeneration. This finding suggests the need for the development of more conservative criteria for residual liver volume in older donors than for younger donors to ensure donor safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":"109 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12270925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2025.109.1.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given the widening of the donor pool to include patients with steatosis, small-for-size grafts, and older patients, this study examined the effect of age on liver volumetric regeneration after a donor right hepatectomy.

Methods: We enrolled 33 older (≥55 years) and 277 younger (<30 years) donors who underwent donor right hepatectomy between March 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score-matched analysis, the perioperative surgical outcomes and growth rates of the remnant liver in 63 younger and 32 older donors were compared. Liver regeneration was assessed using CT volumetry for up to 6 months after surgery. Poor liver regeneration was defined as restoration of less than 80% of the original liver volume. The risk factors for poor liver regeneration were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model.

Results: The mean age of older and younger donors was 58.0 and 24.3 years, respectively. Despite comparable preoperative factors, older donors showed significantly lower regeneration rates at all observed time points (1 month: 75.5% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.001; 3 months: 80.4% vs. 90.5%, P < 0.001; and 6 months: 87.9% vs. 95.8, P = 0.006, compared to total liver volume). A large total liver volume and older age were identified as risk factors for poor liver regeneration.

Conclusion: Older donors showed a reduced capacity for liver regeneration. This finding suggests the need for the development of more conservative criteria for residual liver volume in older donors than for younger donors to ensure donor safety.

年龄对老年供者右肝切除术后肝再生的影响:一项倾向评分匹配的队列研究。
目的:考虑到供体池的扩大,包括脂肪变性患者、小尺寸移植物患者和老年患者,本研究探讨了年龄对供体右肝切除术后肝脏体积再生的影响。方法:我们招募了33名老年人(≥55岁)和277名年轻人(结果:老年人和年轻人的平均年龄分别为58.0岁和24.3岁)。尽管术前因素具有可比性,但老年供体在所有观察时间点的再生率都明显较低(1个月:75.5% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.001;3个月:80.4% vs. 90.5%, P < 0.001;6个月:87.9% vs. 95.8, P = 0.006)。肝总容量大和年龄大被认为是肝再生不良的危险因素。结论:老年供体肝脏再生能力下降。这一发现表明,为确保供体安全,老年供体的剩余肝容量需要制定比年轻供体更保守的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信