Associations between Perceived Tap Water Safety and Dietary Outcomes among US Adults.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Melissa J Slotnick, Cindy W Leung, Anna Claire Tucker, Andrew D Jones, Julia A Wolfson
{"title":"Associations between Perceived Tap Water Safety and Dietary Outcomes among US Adults.","authors":"Melissa J Slotnick, Cindy W Leung, Anna Claire Tucker, Andrew D Jones, Julia A Wolfson","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Water safety and insecurity in the US are growing public health concerns. Concerns about water safety may impact consumption and use in food preparation, yet associations between water insecurity indicators and nutrition outcomes remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate associations between water safety perceptions, diet quality, and intake frequency of dietary components among US adults, and to assess how these associations vary with sociodemographic variables and cooking behaviors at home.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>/Setting: Adults age 18 years and older living across the US (n=4096) completed an online survey in November 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Water perceptions were measured using a 7-point Likert scale measuring agreement with the statement \"My local tap water is safe to drink.\" Diet quality and intake frequency was assessed using the Prime Diet Quality Survey (PDQS-30).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>Generalized linear models, adjusted for sociodemographic variables, assessed associations between tap water safety perceptions and (1) PDQS-30 scores (overall and stratified by \"healthy/unhealthy\" foods) and (2) intake frequency of individual food groups. Sociodemographics and cooking frequency were evaluated as modifiers of the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tap water safety perceptions were not associated with total PDQS-30 scores (B=-0.27, 95%CI: -1.00 to 0.46, p=0.47). For unhealthy foods only, not agreeing tap water was safe (compared with agreement) was associated with a 0.79-point higher PDQS-30 score (95% CI: 0.38 to 1.20; p<0.001), driven by lower intake of red and processed meats and sweets/ice cream. Considering healthy foods only, not agreeing tap water was safe (compared with agreement) was associated with a 1.06-point lower PDQS-30 score (95% CI: -1.83 to -0.29; p =0.007), driven by lower intakes of fruits/vegetables and poultry. This association of lower intake of healthy foods was observed among US adults living in urban and rural areas, but not suburban areas, and for those cooking dinner at home less than 7 days/week; no modification by urbanicity and cooking at home was observed for unhealthy foods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tap water safety perceptions were associated with lower intake of some foods classified as unhealthy, and some foods classified as healthy in this sample of US adults. Urbanicity and cooking dinner from home modified the associations with healthy foods only, highlighting the complex social and environmental aspects of water insecurity and suggesting that tap water safety perceptions could be a barrier to healthy diets in some populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Water safety and insecurity in the US are growing public health concerns. Concerns about water safety may impact consumption and use in food preparation, yet associations between water insecurity indicators and nutrition outcomes remain understudied.

Objectives: To evaluate associations between water safety perceptions, diet quality, and intake frequency of dietary components among US adults, and to assess how these associations vary with sociodemographic variables and cooking behaviors at home.

Design: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted.

Participants: /Setting: Adults age 18 years and older living across the US (n=4096) completed an online survey in November 2023.

Main outcome measures: Water perceptions were measured using a 7-point Likert scale measuring agreement with the statement "My local tap water is safe to drink." Diet quality and intake frequency was assessed using the Prime Diet Quality Survey (PDQS-30).

Statistical analyses: Generalized linear models, adjusted for sociodemographic variables, assessed associations between tap water safety perceptions and (1) PDQS-30 scores (overall and stratified by "healthy/unhealthy" foods) and (2) intake frequency of individual food groups. Sociodemographics and cooking frequency were evaluated as modifiers of the associations.

Results: Tap water safety perceptions were not associated with total PDQS-30 scores (B=-0.27, 95%CI: -1.00 to 0.46, p=0.47). For unhealthy foods only, not agreeing tap water was safe (compared with agreement) was associated with a 0.79-point higher PDQS-30 score (95% CI: 0.38 to 1.20; p<0.001), driven by lower intake of red and processed meats and sweets/ice cream. Considering healthy foods only, not agreeing tap water was safe (compared with agreement) was associated with a 1.06-point lower PDQS-30 score (95% CI: -1.83 to -0.29; p =0.007), driven by lower intakes of fruits/vegetables and poultry. This association of lower intake of healthy foods was observed among US adults living in urban and rural areas, but not suburban areas, and for those cooking dinner at home less than 7 days/week; no modification by urbanicity and cooking at home was observed for unhealthy foods.

Conclusions: Tap water safety perceptions were associated with lower intake of some foods classified as unhealthy, and some foods classified as healthy in this sample of US adults. Urbanicity and cooking dinner from home modified the associations with healthy foods only, highlighting the complex social and environmental aspects of water insecurity and suggesting that tap water safety perceptions could be a barrier to healthy diets in some populations.

美国成年人自来水安全感知与饮食结果之间的关系
背景:在美国,水安全和不安全是日益严重的公共卫生问题。对水安全的担忧可能会影响食品制备中的消费和使用,但水不安全指标与营养结果之间的关系仍未得到充分研究。目的:评估美国成年人对水安全的认知、饮食质量和饮食成分摄入频率之间的关系,并评估这些关系如何随着社会人口变量和家庭烹饪行为而变化。设计:进行横断面在线调查。参与者/环境:居住在美国各地的18岁及以上的成年人(n=4096)于2023年11月完成了一项在线调查。主要结果测量:对水的感知使用7分李克特量表来衡量是否符合“我当地的自来水可以安全饮用”的说法。采用主要饮食质量调查(PDQS-30)评估饮食质量和摄入频率。统计分析:广义线性模型,调整了社会人口变量,评估了自来水安全感知与(1)PDQS-30评分(总体和按“健康/不健康”食物分层)和(2)单个食物组摄入频率之间的关系。社会人口统计学和烹饪频率被评价为这些关联的调节因素。结果:自来水安全感知与总PDQS-30评分无关(B=-0.27, 95%CI: -1.00 ~ 0.46, p=0.47)。仅就不健康食品而言,不同意自来水是安全的(与同意相比)与PDQS-30得分高出0.79分相关(95% CI: 0.38至1.20;结论:在这个美国成年人样本中,自来水安全观念与一些被归类为不健康食品和一些被归类为健康食品的摄入量较低有关。城市化和在家做饭只改变了与健康食品的联系,突出了水不安全的复杂社会和环境方面,并表明自来水安全观念可能成为某些人群健康饮食的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信