(Mis)matches in daily weight stigma perpetrators' and targets' genders and races relative to targets' daily disordered eating behaviors: Examining differences between Black and White women.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Kelly A Romano, Emily Panza, Carol B Peterson, Laura Hooper, Tyler B Mason
{"title":"(Mis)matches in daily weight stigma perpetrators' and targets' genders and races relative to targets' daily disordered eating behaviors: Examining differences between Black and White women.","authors":"Kelly A Romano, Emily Panza, Carol B Peterson, Laura Hooper, Tyler B Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Associations between weight stigma (WS) and disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) vary based on the WS source (e.g., family, strangers). However, no research has examined how (mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races and genders relate to targets' DEBs in the natural environment (e.g., home, work/school).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined whether associations between daily WS and DEBs differed: (1) for Black versus White women; (2) based on whether there were (mis)matches in the races and-separately-genders of WS perpetrators and targets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a remote daily diary study conducted in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Participants completed nightly surveys on mobile devices for 14-days from January 2019-July 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>/Setting: Participants included Black (n=58) and White (n=86) women with body dissatisfaction (ages 18-35).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcomes included binge eating, overeating, loss of control eating, and dietary restriction (skipped meals, refused food/drinks, replaced meals with no/low-calorie substances, limited food amount).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>Multilevel models examined whether associations between daily WS by men, women, Black, or White perpetrators (versus no daily WS; independent variables) and daily DEBs (outcomes) differed for Black versus White women (moderator).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Associations between daily WS and different DEBs were generally largest for Black women when WS was perpetrated by women and, for White women, by men (with exceptions). For example, on days when Black women experienced WS by other women, they were more likely than White women to engage in binge eating (b=0.14, SE=0.06, p=.024), refuse food/drinks (b=0.21, SE=0.07, p=.004), and limit the amount of food they ate (b=0.27, SE=0.10, p=.008). (Mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races were not associated with Black or White women's daily DEBs (ps>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that associations between daily WS and DEBs are especially harmful for women with multiple marginalized identities (Black women), particularly when Black women experience WS by women perpetrators. Further WS research centered on Black women's experiences is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Associations between weight stigma (WS) and disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) vary based on the WS source (e.g., family, strangers). However, no research has examined how (mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races and genders relate to targets' DEBs in the natural environment (e.g., home, work/school).

Objective: This study examined whether associations between daily WS and DEBs differed: (1) for Black versus White women; (2) based on whether there were (mis)matches in the races and-separately-genders of WS perpetrators and targets.

Design: This is a secondary analysis of a remote daily diary study conducted in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Participants completed nightly surveys on mobile devices for 14-days from January 2019-July 2020.

Participants: /Setting: Participants included Black (n=58) and White (n=86) women with body dissatisfaction (ages 18-35).

Main outcome measures: Outcomes included binge eating, overeating, loss of control eating, and dietary restriction (skipped meals, refused food/drinks, replaced meals with no/low-calorie substances, limited food amount).

Statistical analyses performed: Multilevel models examined whether associations between daily WS by men, women, Black, or White perpetrators (versus no daily WS; independent variables) and daily DEBs (outcomes) differed for Black versus White women (moderator).

Results: Associations between daily WS and different DEBs were generally largest for Black women when WS was perpetrated by women and, for White women, by men (with exceptions). For example, on days when Black women experienced WS by other women, they were more likely than White women to engage in binge eating (b=0.14, SE=0.06, p=.024), refuse food/drinks (b=0.21, SE=0.07, p=.004), and limit the amount of food they ate (b=0.27, SE=0.10, p=.008). (Mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races were not associated with Black or White women's daily DEBs (ps>.05).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that associations between daily WS and DEBs are especially harmful for women with multiple marginalized identities (Black women), particularly when Black women experience WS by women perpetrators. Further WS research centered on Black women's experiences is needed.

(Mis)与目标日常饮食失调行为相关的日常体重耻辱肇事者和目标的性别和种族匹配:检查黑人和白人女性之间的差异。
背景:体重耻辱感(WS)与饮食失调行为(DEBs)之间的关系因WS来源(如家庭、陌生人)而异。然而,没有研究调查过WS犯罪者和目标种族和性别的(错误)匹配如何与目标在自然环境(如家庭、工作/学校)中的deb相关。目的:本研究探讨每日WS和DEBs之间的关联是否存在差异:(1)黑人女性与白人女性;(2)根据WS实施者与目标的种族和性别是否存在匹配(不匹配)。设计:这是对在美国大西洋中部进行的一项远程每日日记研究的二次分析。参与者在2019年1月至2020年7月的14天内,在移动设备上完成了夜间调查。参与者:/设置:参与者包括对身体不满意的黑人(n=58)和白人(n=86)女性(18-35岁)。主要结局指标:结局包括暴食、暴饮暴食、饮食失控和饮食限制(不吃饭、拒绝食物/饮料、用无/低热量物质代替膳食、限制食物量)。进行了统计分析:多水平模型检验了男性、女性、黑人或白人施暴者(与无施暴者相比;独立变量)和每日deb(结果)在黑人女性和白人女性(调节因子)中存在差异。结果:当WS由女性实施时,黑人女性每日WS与不同DEBs之间的关联最大,而对于白人女性,WS由男性实施(例外情况)。例如,当黑人女性被其他女性经历WS时,她们比白人女性更有可能暴饮暴食(b=0.14, SE=0.06, p= 0.024),拒绝食物/饮料(b=0.21, SE=0.07, p= 0.004),并限制他们吃的食物量(b=0.27, SE=0.10, p= 0.008)。(Mis)匹配的WS肇事者和目标种族与黑人或白人妇女的日常deb无关(ps>.05)。结论:研究结果表明,日常WS和DEBs之间的关联对具有多重边缘身份的女性(黑人女性)尤其有害,特别是当黑人女性遭受女性施暴者WS时。需要进一步以黑人妇女的经历为中心的WS研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信