(Mis)matches in daily weight stigma perpetrators' and targets' genders and races relative to targets' daily disordered eating behaviors: Examining differences between Black and White women.
Kelly A Romano, Emily Panza, Carol B Peterson, Laura Hooper, Tyler B Mason
{"title":"(Mis)matches in daily weight stigma perpetrators' and targets' genders and races relative to targets' daily disordered eating behaviors: Examining differences between Black and White women.","authors":"Kelly A Romano, Emily Panza, Carol B Peterson, Laura Hooper, Tyler B Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Associations between weight stigma (WS) and disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) vary based on the WS source (e.g., family, strangers). However, no research has examined how (mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races and genders relate to targets' DEBs in the natural environment (e.g., home, work/school).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined whether associations between daily WS and DEBs differed: (1) for Black versus White women; (2) based on whether there were (mis)matches in the races and-separately-genders of WS perpetrators and targets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a remote daily diary study conducted in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Participants completed nightly surveys on mobile devices for 14-days from January 2019-July 2020.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>/Setting: Participants included Black (n=58) and White (n=86) women with body dissatisfaction (ages 18-35).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcomes included binge eating, overeating, loss of control eating, and dietary restriction (skipped meals, refused food/drinks, replaced meals with no/low-calorie substances, limited food amount).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>Multilevel models examined whether associations between daily WS by men, women, Black, or White perpetrators (versus no daily WS; independent variables) and daily DEBs (outcomes) differed for Black versus White women (moderator).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Associations between daily WS and different DEBs were generally largest for Black women when WS was perpetrated by women and, for White women, by men (with exceptions). For example, on days when Black women experienced WS by other women, they were more likely than White women to engage in binge eating (b=0.14, SE=0.06, p=.024), refuse food/drinks (b=0.21, SE=0.07, p=.004), and limit the amount of food they ate (b=0.27, SE=0.10, p=.008). (Mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races were not associated with Black or White women's daily DEBs (ps>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that associations between daily WS and DEBs are especially harmful for women with multiple marginalized identities (Black women), particularly when Black women experience WS by women perpetrators. Further WS research centered on Black women's experiences is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.07.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Associations between weight stigma (WS) and disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) vary based on the WS source (e.g., family, strangers). However, no research has examined how (mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races and genders relate to targets' DEBs in the natural environment (e.g., home, work/school).
Objective: This study examined whether associations between daily WS and DEBs differed: (1) for Black versus White women; (2) based on whether there were (mis)matches in the races and-separately-genders of WS perpetrators and targets.
Design: This is a secondary analysis of a remote daily diary study conducted in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Participants completed nightly surveys on mobile devices for 14-days from January 2019-July 2020.
Participants: /Setting: Participants included Black (n=58) and White (n=86) women with body dissatisfaction (ages 18-35).
Main outcome measures: Outcomes included binge eating, overeating, loss of control eating, and dietary restriction (skipped meals, refused food/drinks, replaced meals with no/low-calorie substances, limited food amount).
Statistical analyses performed: Multilevel models examined whether associations between daily WS by men, women, Black, or White perpetrators (versus no daily WS; independent variables) and daily DEBs (outcomes) differed for Black versus White women (moderator).
Results: Associations between daily WS and different DEBs were generally largest for Black women when WS was perpetrated by women and, for White women, by men (with exceptions). For example, on days when Black women experienced WS by other women, they were more likely than White women to engage in binge eating (b=0.14, SE=0.06, p=.024), refuse food/drinks (b=0.21, SE=0.07, p=.004), and limit the amount of food they ate (b=0.27, SE=0.10, p=.008). (Mis)matches in WS perpetrators' and targets' races were not associated with Black or White women's daily DEBs (ps>.05).
Conclusions: Findings suggest that associations between daily WS and DEBs are especially harmful for women with multiple marginalized identities (Black women), particularly when Black women experience WS by women perpetrators. Further WS research centered on Black women's experiences is needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.