Resource quantity and quality co-limit consumer production in forest streams

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70163
Lee M. Demi, Phillip M. Bumpers, Wyatt F. Cross, Susan L. Eggert, John S. Kominoski, David W. P. Manning, Amy D. Rosemond, J. Bruce Wallace, Seth J. Wenger, Jonathan P. Benstead
{"title":"Resource quantity and quality co-limit consumer production in forest streams","authors":"Lee M. Demi,&nbsp;Phillip M. Bumpers,&nbsp;Wyatt F. Cross,&nbsp;Susan L. Eggert,&nbsp;John S. Kominoski,&nbsp;David W. P. Manning,&nbsp;Amy D. Rosemond,&nbsp;J. Bruce Wallace,&nbsp;Seth J. Wenger,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Benstead","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ecological theory predicts that consumers should be co-limited by resource quantity and quality, given widespread consumer-resource nutritional imbalances. We used 25 estimates of annual community secondary production (ACSP) of stream macroinvertebrates to assess the relative roles of basal resource quantity (leaf litter standing stock [LLSS]) and quality (% nitrogen and % phosphorus of leaf litter) in modulating patterns of production in forest streams. We also tested the effects of hypothesized indirect drivers (stream discharge and inorganic nutrient concentrations) on basal resource quality and quantity and secondary production. In the top model for ACSP, LLSS, and %P together explained 59% of its variation, providing strong evidence of co-limitation by both resource quantity and quality. Mean annual stream discharge and stream water P concentration explained 75% and 43% of variation in LLSS and %P, respectively. Together, stream discharge and stream water P concentration explained 77% of the variation in ACSP, demonstrating a critical link between hypothesized indirect and direct (basal resources) drivers and ACSP. Our results are the first to demonstrate co-limitation of ACSP and highlight several mechanisms by which drivers of anthropogenic global change, such as altered precipitation (stream discharge) and eutrophication, influence the productivity of animal communities in stream ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological theory predicts that consumers should be co-limited by resource quantity and quality, given widespread consumer-resource nutritional imbalances. We used 25 estimates of annual community secondary production (ACSP) of stream macroinvertebrates to assess the relative roles of basal resource quantity (leaf litter standing stock [LLSS]) and quality (% nitrogen and % phosphorus of leaf litter) in modulating patterns of production in forest streams. We also tested the effects of hypothesized indirect drivers (stream discharge and inorganic nutrient concentrations) on basal resource quality and quantity and secondary production. In the top model for ACSP, LLSS, and %P together explained 59% of its variation, providing strong evidence of co-limitation by both resource quantity and quality. Mean annual stream discharge and stream water P concentration explained 75% and 43% of variation in LLSS and %P, respectively. Together, stream discharge and stream water P concentration explained 77% of the variation in ACSP, demonstrating a critical link between hypothesized indirect and direct (basal resources) drivers and ACSP. Our results are the first to demonstrate co-limitation of ACSP and highlight several mechanisms by which drivers of anthropogenic global change, such as altered precipitation (stream discharge) and eutrophication, influence the productivity of animal communities in stream ecosystems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

资源的数量和质量共同限制了森林溪流的消费生产
生态学理论预测,鉴于普遍存在的消费者-资源营养失衡,消费者应该受到资源数量和质量的共同限制。利用25个大型溪流无脊椎动物群落年次生产量(ACSP)估算值,评估了基础资源量(凋落叶总蓄积[LLSS])和质量(凋落叶总氮磷百分比)在调节森林溪流生产模式中的相对作用。我们还测试了假设的间接驱动因素(河流流量和无机养分浓度)对基础资源质量和数量以及二次生产的影响。在ACSP的顶级模型中,LLSS和%P共同解释了其变异的59%,提供了资源数量和质量共同限制的有力证据。年平均河流流量和河流水磷浓度分别解释了75%和43%的LLSS和%P的变化。综上所述,河流流量和水体磷浓度解释了77%的ACSP变化,表明了假设的间接和直接(基础资源)驱动因素与ACSP之间的关键联系。我们的研究结果首次证明了ACSP的共同局限性,并强调了人为全球变化驱动因素(如降水改变(河流流量)和富营养化)影响河流生态系统中动物群落生产力的几种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信