Common and Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Evidence From the Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tao Ding, Peihua Xian, Shuai Jin, Zhiyuan Liu, Xuqun You
{"title":"Common and Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Evidence From the Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis","authors":"Tao Ding,&nbsp;Peihua Xian,&nbsp;Shuai Jin,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Liu,&nbsp;Xuqun You","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Risky decision-making, a ubiquitous aspect of human behavior, primarily encompasses two behavioral tendencies: risk seeking and risk aversion. Despite extensive exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in risk decision-making, the specific neural activity patterns underlying risk seeking and risk aversion, along with their dynamic regulatory mechanisms, remain unclear. This study employed a comprehensive meta-analysis approach that includes 43 risk seeking and 22 risk aversion whole-brain experiments to explore the neural basis and functional networks of risk seeking and risk aversion. The results indicated that risk seeking was associated with activations in the right insula and left caudate, whereas risk aversion was related to activations in the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Further analyses showed that risk seeking primarily was linked to the reward network, salience network, and cognitive control network, while risk aversion primarily was involved in the cognitive control network and valuation network. These findings lend support to the dual-system theory, wherein risk seeking is predominantly influenced by the emotional system, whereas risk aversion is primarily driven by the cognitive system. Our study offers a novel perspective on the neural mechanisms underpinning risky decision-making and provides a theoretical foundation for interventions aimed at individuals with decision-making impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70295","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risky decision-making, a ubiquitous aspect of human behavior, primarily encompasses two behavioral tendencies: risk seeking and risk aversion. Despite extensive exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in risk decision-making, the specific neural activity patterns underlying risk seeking and risk aversion, along with their dynamic regulatory mechanisms, remain unclear. This study employed a comprehensive meta-analysis approach that includes 43 risk seeking and 22 risk aversion whole-brain experiments to explore the neural basis and functional networks of risk seeking and risk aversion. The results indicated that risk seeking was associated with activations in the right insula and left caudate, whereas risk aversion was related to activations in the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Further analyses showed that risk seeking primarily was linked to the reward network, salience network, and cognitive control network, while risk aversion primarily was involved in the cognitive control network and valuation network. These findings lend support to the dual-system theory, wherein risk seeking is predominantly influenced by the emotional system, whereas risk aversion is primarily driven by the cognitive system. Our study offers a novel perspective on the neural mechanisms underpinning risky decision-making and provides a theoretical foundation for interventions aimed at individuals with decision-making impairments.

Abstract Image

风险寻求和风险厌恶背后的共同和独特的神经机制:来自神经影像学荟萃分析的证据
风险决策是人类行为中普遍存在的一个方面,主要包括两种行为倾向:风险寻求和风险规避。尽管人们对风险决策的神经机制进行了广泛的探索,但风险寻求和风险厌恶背后的具体神经活动模式及其动态调控机制仍不清楚。本研究采用综合meta分析方法,包括43个风险寻求和22个风险厌恶全脑实验,探讨风险寻求和风险厌恶的神经基础和功能网络。结果表明,风险寻求与右侧脑岛和左侧尾状核的激活有关,而风险厌恶与左侧颞中回和左侧前扣带皮层的激活有关。进一步分析表明,风险寻求主要与奖励网络、突出网络和认知控制网络有关,而风险厌恶主要与认知控制网络和评估网络有关。这些发现支持了双系统理论,其中风险寻求主要受情绪系统的影响,而风险厌恶主要受认知系统的驱动。我们的研究为风险决策的神经机制提供了一个新的视角,并为针对决策障碍个体的干预提供了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信