Commentary on “Association of Serum Total Bilirubin to Cholesterol Ratio With Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study”
{"title":"Commentary on “Association of Serum Total Bilirubin to Cholesterol Ratio With Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study”","authors":"Tinghua Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1753-0407.70129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several key factors influencing bilirubin levels and lipid metabolism were not measured or adjusted for in the study. Notably, hemoglobin, which affects bilirubin metabolism [<span>5</span>], was not included in the analysis. Furthermore, longitudinal changes in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, or albuminuria during follow-up were also not accounted for. These unmeasured confounders may influence the observed association between the TBIL/TC ratio and CKD progression.</p><p>Chen et al. have highlighted the potential of the TBIL/TC ratio as a biomarker for CKD progression in type 2 diabetes. However, the issues of outcome misclassification, medication confounding, and oversimplified threshold analyses necessitate cautious interpretation of their findings. Future studies should aim to: (1) Validate these findings in ambulatory cohorts using KDIGO-endorsed sustained eGFR decline criteria; (2) Integrate time-varying adjustments for nephroprotective medications and account for genetic and environmental confounders; (3) Report absolute risks and conduct decision-curve analyses to better evaluate the clinical utility of the TBIL/TC ratio. Addressing these limitations will help clarify whether the TBIL/TC ratio offers incremental value beyond established renal risk markers.</p><p>Tinghua Zhang: wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. Additionally, he conceptualized the study concept and design.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1753-0407.70129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-0407.70129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several key factors influencing bilirubin levels and lipid metabolism were not measured or adjusted for in the study. Notably, hemoglobin, which affects bilirubin metabolism [5], was not included in the analysis. Furthermore, longitudinal changes in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, or albuminuria during follow-up were also not accounted for. These unmeasured confounders may influence the observed association between the TBIL/TC ratio and CKD progression.
Chen et al. have highlighted the potential of the TBIL/TC ratio as a biomarker for CKD progression in type 2 diabetes. However, the issues of outcome misclassification, medication confounding, and oversimplified threshold analyses necessitate cautious interpretation of their findings. Future studies should aim to: (1) Validate these findings in ambulatory cohorts using KDIGO-endorsed sustained eGFR decline criteria; (2) Integrate time-varying adjustments for nephroprotective medications and account for genetic and environmental confounders; (3) Report absolute risks and conduct decision-curve analyses to better evaluate the clinical utility of the TBIL/TC ratio. Addressing these limitations will help clarify whether the TBIL/TC ratio offers incremental value beyond established renal risk markers.
Tinghua Zhang: wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. Additionally, he conceptualized the study concept and design.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes (JDB) devotes itself to diabetes research, therapeutics, and education. It aims to involve researchers and practitioners in a dialogue between East and West via all aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes, including the molecular, biochemical, and physiological aspects of diabetes. The Editorial team is international with a unique mix of Asian and Western participation.
The Editors welcome submissions in form of original research articles, images, novel case reports and correspondence, and will solicit reviews, point-counterpoint, commentaries, editorials, news highlights, and educational content.