{"title":"Estimating Ecosystem Resilience From Noisy Observational Data","authors":"Mengyang Cai, Yao Zhang, Jinghao Qiu","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The resilience of an ecosystem indicates its capacity to recover from disturbances, a quality essential for maintaining ecosystem persistence under global change. Temporal autocorrelation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) of ecosystem states has been increasingly used to measure the change of ecosystem resilience, with increasing <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> representing a decline in resilience and approach toward potential tipping points. However, observations of ecosystem states are inevitably embedded with noise of different kinds, and the extent to which measurement noise may affect resilience assessments remains unclear. This study employs mathematical derivation, idealized experiments, and remote sensing datasets with varying noise levels to examine the effect of measurement noise on the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> calculation. Our analyses indicate that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> estimates from noisy datasets are systematically lower than those from noise-free datasets, with the degree of underestimation varying with noise levels, observational frequencies, and pulse-like disturbance intensities. Specifically, higher temporal resolution of observation and greater disturbance intensity enhances the accuracy of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> estimates under constant noise levels. Additionally, we highlight that temporal changes of noise and disturbance characteristics may bias the trend of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>TAC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\mathrm{TAC} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, potentially resulting in spurious early warning signals of critical transitions. Employing observations with higher temporal resolution, together with appropriate data processing techniques, can partially mitigate the influence of noise and thereby enable more accurate assessments of global ecosystem resilience.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The resilience of an ecosystem indicates its capacity to recover from disturbances, a quality essential for maintaining ecosystem persistence under global change. Temporal autocorrelation () of ecosystem states has been increasingly used to measure the change of ecosystem resilience, with increasing representing a decline in resilience and approach toward potential tipping points. However, observations of ecosystem states are inevitably embedded with noise of different kinds, and the extent to which measurement noise may affect resilience assessments remains unclear. This study employs mathematical derivation, idealized experiments, and remote sensing datasets with varying noise levels to examine the effect of measurement noise on the calculation. Our analyses indicate that estimates from noisy datasets are systematically lower than those from noise-free datasets, with the degree of underestimation varying with noise levels, observational frequencies, and pulse-like disturbance intensities. Specifically, higher temporal resolution of observation and greater disturbance intensity enhances the accuracy of estimates under constant noise levels. Additionally, we highlight that temporal changes of noise and disturbance characteristics may bias the trend of , potentially resulting in spurious early warning signals of critical transitions. Employing observations with higher temporal resolution, together with appropriate data processing techniques, can partially mitigate the influence of noise and thereby enable more accurate assessments of global ecosystem resilience.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.