Aishwarya Rani, Suraj Negi, Yu-Ning Chen, Cheng-Hsiu Yu, Shu-Yuan Pan
{"title":"Electrochemical Biogas Upgrading: Energy, Environmental, Economic, and Engineering Considerations","authors":"Aishwarya Rani, Suraj Negi, Yu-Ning Chen, Cheng-Hsiu Yu, Shu-Yuan Pan","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biogas, a renewable energy source produced from the anaerobic digestion of biomass and/or organic residues, contains a mixture of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>). To be used as a fuel, biogas must be upgraded to increase its CH<sub>4</sub> content to over 90%. Traditional upgrading methods, such as amine scrubbing and membrane separation, are energy-intensive, costly, and environmentally burdensome. This study explores the potential of electrochemical technologies as sustainable alternatives for biogas upgrading from the aspects of energy, environment, economics, and engineering. Recent advances in promising electrochemical approaches including pretreatment, microbial conversion enhancement, CO<sub>2</sub> capture, CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reactions, and methanation are first reviewed. The performance of these approaches is then systematically compared based on operational characteristics and efficiency metrics. Our findings indicate that microbial and bioelectrochemical systems can achieve CH<sub>4</sub> purities over 92%. Also, electrochemical technologies offer > 99.9% hydrogen sulfide removal (desulfurization). State-of-the-art electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> reduction technologies demonstrate Faradaic efficiencies generally 50%–80%, with the selectivity of CH<sub>4</sub> up to 99.7%. From the environmental aspect, integrating renewable electricity into microbial, electrochemical (or -based), and bioelectrochemical upgrading systems yields roughly 10%–74% life-cycle GHG reductions relative to conventional fossil-energy pathways, with certain renewable power-to-methane configurations achieving net-negative emissions. Lastly, this study identifies several priority research directions, such as (1) advanced catalyst and electrode development, (2) system integrations with air pollutant control facilities, (3) life-cycle environmental and techno-economic assessment, and (4) digestate valorization for multiple product ecosystems. Electrochemical approaches offer a promising path toward clean, efficient, and decentralized biogas utilization, contributing to global decarbonization and energy transition goals toward a circular bioeconomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biogas, a renewable energy source produced from the anaerobic digestion of biomass and/or organic residues, contains a mixture of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). To be used as a fuel, biogas must be upgraded to increase its CH4 content to over 90%. Traditional upgrading methods, such as amine scrubbing and membrane separation, are energy-intensive, costly, and environmentally burdensome. This study explores the potential of electrochemical technologies as sustainable alternatives for biogas upgrading from the aspects of energy, environment, economics, and engineering. Recent advances in promising electrochemical approaches including pretreatment, microbial conversion enhancement, CO2 capture, CO2 reduction reactions, and methanation are first reviewed. The performance of these approaches is then systematically compared based on operational characteristics and efficiency metrics. Our findings indicate that microbial and bioelectrochemical systems can achieve CH4 purities over 92%. Also, electrochemical technologies offer > 99.9% hydrogen sulfide removal (desulfurization). State-of-the-art electrochemical CO2 reduction technologies demonstrate Faradaic efficiencies generally 50%–80%, with the selectivity of CH4 up to 99.7%. From the environmental aspect, integrating renewable electricity into microbial, electrochemical (or -based), and bioelectrochemical upgrading systems yields roughly 10%–74% life-cycle GHG reductions relative to conventional fossil-energy pathways, with certain renewable power-to-methane configurations achieving net-negative emissions. Lastly, this study identifies several priority research directions, such as (1) advanced catalyst and electrode development, (2) system integrations with air pollutant control facilities, (3) life-cycle environmental and techno-economic assessment, and (4) digestate valorization for multiple product ecosystems. Electrochemical approaches offer a promising path toward clean, efficient, and decentralized biogas utilization, contributing to global decarbonization and energy transition goals toward a circular bioeconomy.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.