{"title":"Cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms in the aging population: The buffering role of marital status","authors":"M. Ciziceno , G. Maggio","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the moderating role of marital status in the relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning in older adults from 12 European countries. Using longitudinal panel data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), we hypothesize that marriage buffers the negative effects of depression on cognitive abilities, focusing on immediate and delayed memory and verbal fluency.</div><div>Building on the Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD) model, we argue that not only the presence of a marital relationship, but also its quality, plays a crucial role in shaping mental and cognitive health.</div><div>Our findings indicate that marriage has a protective effect on verbal fluency, likely due to the cognitive stimulation provided by spousal interactions. This buffering effect does not extend to other cognitive domains, such as immediate and delayed memory, which may be more influenced by neurobiological factors. Moreover, we find that in the context of depression symptoms married women benefit more from the protective effects of marriage than men, possibly due to gender differences in social engagement within relationships. The results underscore the importance of both marital support and relationship quality for cognitive health. From a policy perspective, initiatives promoting spousal engagement, horizontal networking, and peer-support programs may help reduce the cognitive risks associated with depression and social isolation in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 118425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the moderating role of marital status in the relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning in older adults from 12 European countries. Using longitudinal panel data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), we hypothesize that marriage buffers the negative effects of depression on cognitive abilities, focusing on immediate and delayed memory and verbal fluency.
Building on the Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD) model, we argue that not only the presence of a marital relationship, but also its quality, plays a crucial role in shaping mental and cognitive health.
Our findings indicate that marriage has a protective effect on verbal fluency, likely due to the cognitive stimulation provided by spousal interactions. This buffering effect does not extend to other cognitive domains, such as immediate and delayed memory, which may be more influenced by neurobiological factors. Moreover, we find that in the context of depression symptoms married women benefit more from the protective effects of marriage than men, possibly due to gender differences in social engagement within relationships. The results underscore the importance of both marital support and relationship quality for cognitive health. From a policy perspective, initiatives promoting spousal engagement, horizontal networking, and peer-support programs may help reduce the cognitive risks associated with depression and social isolation in older adults.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.