{"title":"Expectation vs reality: A case study of the impact of the da Vinci surgical robot on healthcare professionals’ work experiences","authors":"Hong Yu Liu , James Hayton","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, considerable academic attention has been devoted to the use of new technology in the healthcare sector. However, there is limited empirical knowledge about how everyday professional work is affected or how professionals actually experience these changes. This article assesses the introduction of the da Vinci surgical robot in the colorectal surgery department of a National Health Service Hospital in England. It argues that the impact of technology on healthcare workers is not predetermined by the characteristics of a technology and should be understood as a combination of positive and negative experiences in specific, highly contextualised workplace settings. Benefits to patients of the da Vinci surgical robot are clinically promising, but its implementation continues to be difficult, and the trade-offs look much different for varying employee groups. Our ethnographic method enables us to present this finding in granular detail: the da Vinci surgical robot can improve the morale and occupational health of the healthcare professionals in this hospital, yet negative impacts such as anxiety associated with conducting new operation procedures are commonly experienced by surgical team members. This article covers themes such as recruitment, preparation, and training, and offers much-needed insights into the long-term development of the healthcare workforce in England and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 118437"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, considerable academic attention has been devoted to the use of new technology in the healthcare sector. However, there is limited empirical knowledge about how everyday professional work is affected or how professionals actually experience these changes. This article assesses the introduction of the da Vinci surgical robot in the colorectal surgery department of a National Health Service Hospital in England. It argues that the impact of technology on healthcare workers is not predetermined by the characteristics of a technology and should be understood as a combination of positive and negative experiences in specific, highly contextualised workplace settings. Benefits to patients of the da Vinci surgical robot are clinically promising, but its implementation continues to be difficult, and the trade-offs look much different for varying employee groups. Our ethnographic method enables us to present this finding in granular detail: the da Vinci surgical robot can improve the morale and occupational health of the healthcare professionals in this hospital, yet negative impacts such as anxiety associated with conducting new operation procedures are commonly experienced by surgical team members. This article covers themes such as recruitment, preparation, and training, and offers much-needed insights into the long-term development of the healthcare workforce in England and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.