Taye M. Hallock , Patrick J.A. Kelly , Aidan Campagnolio , Makhari Dysart , Rebecca Fülöp , Izzy Kaufman , Nova McGiffert , Sally Gould-Taylor
{"title":"The healthcare experiences of LGBTQ people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the United States: A scoping review","authors":"Taye M. Hallock , Patrick J.A. Kelly , Aidan Campagnolio , Makhari Dysart , Rebecca Fülöp , Izzy Kaufman , Nova McGiffert , Sally Gould-Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) each face multiple systems of oppression (e.g., cissexism, ableism) that produce interpersonal, institutional, and environmental barriers to accessing healthcare services. For people with intersecting LGBTQ and IDD identities, these barriers coalesce to further restrict access to healthcare, worsening quality of health and health disparities. This scoping review explores the experiences of LGBTQ people with IDD and the barriers and facilitators they encounter when accessing care within the U.S. healthcare system. Identification of barriers and facilitators can inform multi-level intervention targets including provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes and advocacy strategies for environmental and systems-level change. A registered protocol guided the search for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published before November 24, 2024. Sources included LGBTQ people with IDD and reported on experiences accessing and navigating healthcare services. Twenty-one articles were included in the review. The Behavioral-Ecological Framework of Healthcare Access and Navigation informed mapping of findings. Articles primarily described personal and provider factors (n = 17) that impact access to care and the healthcare environment (n = 14), while fewer described social environments (n = 7). Little attention has been paid to the built environment. Barriers included patient-provider communication challenges, difficulty finding competent providers, and the complexity of navigating healthcare systems. Facilitators included supportive social networks, affirming and accommodating providers, and healthcare policies that reduce healthcare costs and offer legal protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 118431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) each face multiple systems of oppression (e.g., cissexism, ableism) that produce interpersonal, institutional, and environmental barriers to accessing healthcare services. For people with intersecting LGBTQ and IDD identities, these barriers coalesce to further restrict access to healthcare, worsening quality of health and health disparities. This scoping review explores the experiences of LGBTQ people with IDD and the barriers and facilitators they encounter when accessing care within the U.S. healthcare system. Identification of barriers and facilitators can inform multi-level intervention targets including provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes and advocacy strategies for environmental and systems-level change. A registered protocol guided the search for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published before November 24, 2024. Sources included LGBTQ people with IDD and reported on experiences accessing and navigating healthcare services. Twenty-one articles were included in the review. The Behavioral-Ecological Framework of Healthcare Access and Navigation informed mapping of findings. Articles primarily described personal and provider factors (n = 17) that impact access to care and the healthcare environment (n = 14), while fewer described social environments (n = 7). Little attention has been paid to the built environment. Barriers included patient-provider communication challenges, difficulty finding competent providers, and the complexity of navigating healthcare systems. Facilitators included supportive social networks, affirming and accommodating providers, and healthcare policies that reduce healthcare costs and offer legal protection.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.