{"title":"Four kinds of subjectivity: from speaking to communicating","authors":"Henrik Bergqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the paper is to argue for the utility of subjectivity as a descriptive notion and to support this aim by distinguishing between different levels of linguistic analysis where subjectivity plays a role. The idea behind this is to develop and promote the use of the notion of subjectivity in the framework of descriptive linguistics and cross-linguistic comparison. Subjectivity is conceptualized as the speaker’s expression of “self” and the paper identifies four kinds of subjectivity: Subjectivity of speaking – the speaker’s choice to say one thing instead of another; Subjectivity of reference – how speaking subjects position themselves with respect to objects, places, times, and other speaking subjects; Subjectivity of stance – how speaking subjects position their attitudes to knowledge of the world with respect to the knowledge-states of other speaking subjects; Subjectivity of communication - how speaking subjects position their utterances with respect to the potential and actual utterances of other speaking subjects. On the communicative level, subjectivity is argued to be a useful notion in the definition of grammatical forms that primarily serve communicative, rather than referential functions. On this level, the speaker’s responsibility for an utterance constitutes a subjective orientation that may be contrasted with a non-subjective, public orientation where the speaker shares responsibility with a larger group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to argue for the utility of subjectivity as a descriptive notion and to support this aim by distinguishing between different levels of linguistic analysis where subjectivity plays a role. The idea behind this is to develop and promote the use of the notion of subjectivity in the framework of descriptive linguistics and cross-linguistic comparison. Subjectivity is conceptualized as the speaker’s expression of “self” and the paper identifies four kinds of subjectivity: Subjectivity of speaking – the speaker’s choice to say one thing instead of another; Subjectivity of reference – how speaking subjects position themselves with respect to objects, places, times, and other speaking subjects; Subjectivity of stance – how speaking subjects position their attitudes to knowledge of the world with respect to the knowledge-states of other speaking subjects; Subjectivity of communication - how speaking subjects position their utterances with respect to the potential and actual utterances of other speaking subjects. On the communicative level, subjectivity is argued to be a useful notion in the definition of grammatical forms that primarily serve communicative, rather than referential functions. On this level, the speaker’s responsibility for an utterance constitutes a subjective orientation that may be contrasted with a non-subjective, public orientation where the speaker shares responsibility with a larger group.
期刊介绍:
Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.