Cost-optimal sizing of battery energy storage systems in microgrids using artificial Rabbits optimization

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Riwa Q. Momani , Ahmad Abuelrub , Hussein M.K. Al-Masri , Ali Q. Al-Shetwi
{"title":"Cost-optimal sizing of battery energy storage systems in microgrids using artificial Rabbits optimization","authors":"Riwa Q. Momani ,&nbsp;Ahmad Abuelrub ,&nbsp;Hussein M.K. Al-Masri ,&nbsp;Ali Q. Al-Shetwi","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a cost-optimal sizing framework for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) in grid-connected microgrids using the Artificial Rabbits Optimization (ARO) algorithm. The main objective is to minimize the total operational cost of the microgrid by optimally determining the size of the BESS under real-world constraints, including dynamic pricing, varying load, and renewable energy availability. The proposed model incorporates technical and economic considerations, including depth-of-discharge limits, initial battery state-of-charge (SOC), and different wind turbine models. Three operational scenarios are evaluated: without BESS (Case A), and with BESS initialized at 20 %, and 100 % SOC (Cases B, and C). ARO is benchmarked against Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and Firefly Algorithm (FA). For example, in Case C, ARO achieved the lowest operational cost of $778.81/day, compared to $793.86/day of PSO, $901.78/day of ABC, and $786.18/day of FA​. Additionally, in Case A, where no BESS is included, the total cost was $1069.10/day, while the introduction of optimally sized BESS in Case C reduced the cost to $778.81/day, demonstrating a significant economic benefit. Sensitivity analysis further confirms the robustness of the approach to changes in PV and WT generation, load demand, and battery efficiency. The results validate the effectiveness and computational efficiency of ARO for realistic and flexible microgrid energy management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100486"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a cost-optimal sizing framework for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) in grid-connected microgrids using the Artificial Rabbits Optimization (ARO) algorithm. The main objective is to minimize the total operational cost of the microgrid by optimally determining the size of the BESS under real-world constraints, including dynamic pricing, varying load, and renewable energy availability. The proposed model incorporates technical and economic considerations, including depth-of-discharge limits, initial battery state-of-charge (SOC), and different wind turbine models. Three operational scenarios are evaluated: without BESS (Case A), and with BESS initialized at 20 %, and 100 % SOC (Cases B, and C). ARO is benchmarked against Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and Firefly Algorithm (FA). For example, in Case C, ARO achieved the lowest operational cost of $778.81/day, compared to $793.86/day of PSO, $901.78/day of ABC, and $786.18/day of FA​. Additionally, in Case A, where no BESS is included, the total cost was $1069.10/day, while the introduction of optimally sized BESS in Case C reduced the cost to $778.81/day, demonstrating a significant economic benefit. Sensitivity analysis further confirms the robustness of the approach to changes in PV and WT generation, load demand, and battery efficiency. The results validate the effectiveness and computational efficiency of ARO for realistic and flexible microgrid energy management.
基于人工兔子优化的微电网电池储能系统成本优化
本文利用人工兔子优化(ARO)算法提出了并网微电网中电池储能系统(BESS)成本最优的尺寸框架。主要目标是在现实世界的约束条件下,通过优化BESS的规模,包括动态定价、变化负荷和可再生能源的可用性,最大限度地降低微电网的总运营成本。该模型结合了技术和经济方面的考虑,包括放电深度限制、初始电池充电状态(SOC)和不同的风力涡轮机模型。评估了三种操作场景:无BESS(案例A)、BESS初始化为20%和100% SOC(案例B和C)。ARO算法对粒子群算法(PSO)、人工蜂群算法(ABC)和萤火虫算法(FA)进行了基准测试。例如,在案例C中,ARO实现了最低的运营成本,为778.81美元/天,而PSO为793.86美元/天,ABC为901.78美元/天,FA为786.18美元/天。此外,在案例A中,不包括BESS,总成本为1069.10美元/天,而在案例C中引入最佳尺寸的BESS将成本降低到778.81美元/天,显示出显著的经济效益。敏感性分析进一步证实了该方法对PV和WT发电、负载需求和电池效率变化的鲁棒性。结果验证了ARO算法在现实、灵活的微电网能量管理中的有效性和计算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信