Tao Zhou , Kai Li , Bohai Liu , Fulong Xie , Liping Xu , Han Zhang
{"title":"Competitive strategies in digital service capability: Self-Development vs. Cooperation","authors":"Tao Zhou , Kai Li , Bohai Liu , Fulong Xie , Liping Xu , Han Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine various competition modes arising from the deployment of the digital service capabilities by two competing digital companies in smart product service systems, and analyze the effects of digital service value-addition, the alignment between smart products and digital services on the operations of rival parties. We construct game-theoretic competition models to derive the optimal deployment strategy for digital companies’ digital service capabilities, as well as to determine the optimal digital service level and pricing strategy. According to the sub-game perfect equilibrium outcomes derived from a specific competition mode, our findings uncover that even if a party’s digital service capability is weaker, its digital company still possesses the potential to outperform its rival in terms of profitability. Additionally, an increase in value-addition offered by digital services can undermine digital companies’ profitability. Likewise, the heightened alignment between smart products and digital services can be detrimental to digital companies. Furthermore, our analysis unveils that when the digital service capabilities of both competitors are strong, one of the digital companies will deviate from the symmetrical digital service capability deployment strategy, resulting in an asymmetrical equilibrium in which one company invests internally to develop a digital service capability, while the other partners with an external provider. On the contrary, when the digital service capabilities are weak, both competing digital companies opt to invest internally to deploy the digital service capability. However, this symmetrical equilibrium strategy ultimately places both digital companies in a prisoner’s dilemma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 104291"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525003321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examine various competition modes arising from the deployment of the digital service capabilities by two competing digital companies in smart product service systems, and analyze the effects of digital service value-addition, the alignment between smart products and digital services on the operations of rival parties. We construct game-theoretic competition models to derive the optimal deployment strategy for digital companies’ digital service capabilities, as well as to determine the optimal digital service level and pricing strategy. According to the sub-game perfect equilibrium outcomes derived from a specific competition mode, our findings uncover that even if a party’s digital service capability is weaker, its digital company still possesses the potential to outperform its rival in terms of profitability. Additionally, an increase in value-addition offered by digital services can undermine digital companies’ profitability. Likewise, the heightened alignment between smart products and digital services can be detrimental to digital companies. Furthermore, our analysis unveils that when the digital service capabilities of both competitors are strong, one of the digital companies will deviate from the symmetrical digital service capability deployment strategy, resulting in an asymmetrical equilibrium in which one company invests internally to develop a digital service capability, while the other partners with an external provider. On the contrary, when the digital service capabilities are weak, both competing digital companies opt to invest internally to deploy the digital service capability. However, this symmetrical equilibrium strategy ultimately places both digital companies in a prisoner’s dilemma.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.