Deciphering genetic relationships within and among banana (Musa spp.) genome groups using ISSR and SRAP markers

IF 3.5 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Roshida Soraisham , Punshi Tongbram , Surendrakumar Singh Thingnam , Boris Aheibam , John Zothanzama , Dinamani Singh Lourembam , Robert Thangjam
{"title":"Deciphering genetic relationships within and among banana (Musa spp.) genome groups using ISSR and SRAP markers","authors":"Roshida Soraisham ,&nbsp;Punshi Tongbram ,&nbsp;Surendrakumar Singh Thingnam ,&nbsp;Boris Aheibam ,&nbsp;John Zothanzama ,&nbsp;Dinamani Singh Lourembam ,&nbsp;Robert Thangjam","doi":"10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Characterization and identification of banana into their correct genome groups has been a problematic issue based on morphological and unappropriated molecular markers. In the present study, the genetic relationship between and among 28 banana (<em>Musa</em> spp.) accessions representing 5 genome groups (AAA, BB, AAB, ABB and AB) were evaluated using sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Although similar genetic relationship parameters were observed with the two markers, the higher values were generated with SRAP profiles as indicated with mean gene diversity value of 0.69 with SRAP and 0.64 with ISSR, polymorphic information content (PIC) of 0.64 with SRAP and 0.59 with ISSR, total genetic diversity (<em>Ht</em>) of 0.39 with SRAP and 0.34 with ISSR, gene diversity within population (<em>Hs</em>) of 0.19 with SRAP and 0.12 with ISSR, coefficient of gene differentiation (<em>Gst</em>) value of 0.51 with SRAP and 0.62 with ISSR and gene flow (<em>Nm</em>)value of 0.51 with SRAP and 0.31 with ISSR. The resulting dendrogram and the population structure also supports and showed the concurrence with the genetic relationship parameters based on the genome groups of the accessions studied. The present finding, also indicates the higher efficacy of SRAP markers over the ISSR markers in the discrimination of banana accessions based on their genome groups by grouping the banana accessions belonging to the different genome groups and ploidy levels. The present finding could be utilized for effective discrimination of banana accessions belonging to different genome groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology","volume":"23 3","pages":"Article 100540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687157X25000848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Characterization and identification of banana into their correct genome groups has been a problematic issue based on morphological and unappropriated molecular markers. In the present study, the genetic relationship between and among 28 banana (Musa spp.) accessions representing 5 genome groups (AAA, BB, AAB, ABB and AB) were evaluated using sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Although similar genetic relationship parameters were observed with the two markers, the higher values were generated with SRAP profiles as indicated with mean gene diversity value of 0.69 with SRAP and 0.64 with ISSR, polymorphic information content (PIC) of 0.64 with SRAP and 0.59 with ISSR, total genetic diversity (Ht) of 0.39 with SRAP and 0.34 with ISSR, gene diversity within population (Hs) of 0.19 with SRAP and 0.12 with ISSR, coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) value of 0.51 with SRAP and 0.62 with ISSR and gene flow (Nm)value of 0.51 with SRAP and 0.31 with ISSR. The resulting dendrogram and the population structure also supports and showed the concurrence with the genetic relationship parameters based on the genome groups of the accessions studied. The present finding, also indicates the higher efficacy of SRAP markers over the ISSR markers in the discrimination of banana accessions based on their genome groups by grouping the banana accessions belonging to the different genome groups and ploidy levels. The present finding could be utilized for effective discrimination of banana accessions belonging to different genome groups.

Abstract Image

利用ISSR和SRAP标记破译香蕉(Musa spp)基因组群内部和之间的遗传关系
基于形态学和不适当的分子标记,香蕉正确基因组群的鉴定和鉴定一直是一个有问题的问题。本研究利用序列相关扩增多态性(SRAP)和简单序列重复(ISSR)标记对香蕉(Musa spp.) 5个基因组群(AAA、BB、AAB、ABB和AB)的28个种质间的亲缘关系进行了分析。虽然两种标记的遗传关系参数相似,但SRAP谱的遗传多样性值更高,SRAP谱的平均基因多样性值为0.69,ISSR谱的平均基因多样性值为0.64,SRAP谱的多态性信息含量(PIC)为0.64,ISSR谱的多态性信息含量(PIC)为0.59,SRAP谱的总遗传多样性(Ht)为0.39,ISSR谱的总遗传多样性值为0.34,SRAP谱的群体内基因多样性值为0.19,ISSR谱的群体内基因多样性值为0.12。SRAP组基因分化系数(Gst)为0.51,ISSR组为0.62;基因流量(Nm)为0.51,ISSR组为0.31。所得到的树状图和群体结构也与基于所研究材料基因组群的亲缘关系参数一致。通过对不同基因组组和倍性水平的香蕉材料进行分组,本研究结果也表明SRAP标记在基于基因组组的香蕉材料鉴定中比ISSR标记具有更高的效率。本研究结果可用于不同基因组群香蕉材料的有效鉴别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
159
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of genetic engineering and biotechnology is devoted to rapid publication of full-length research papers that leads to significant contribution in advancing knowledge in genetic engineering and biotechnology and provide novel perspectives in this research area. JGEB includes all major themes related to genetic engineering and recombinant DNA. The area of interest of JGEB includes but not restricted to: •Plant genetics •Animal genetics •Bacterial enzymes •Agricultural Biotechnology, •Biochemistry, •Biophysics, •Bioinformatics, •Environmental Biotechnology, •Industrial Biotechnology, •Microbial biotechnology, •Medical Biotechnology, •Bioenergy, Biosafety, •Biosecurity, •Bioethics, •GMOS, •Genomic, •Proteomic JGEB accepts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信