Geert A Martens,Dieter De Smet,Guy Froyen,Koen Swaerts,Annick Daniels,Elke Boone,Pieter-Jan Volders,Katrien De Mulder,Ellen Geerdens,Severine Berden,Jense Wils,Pauline Herroelen,Henk Louagie,Brigitte Maes
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Digital Estimates of Trophoblastic Mosaicism in Genome-Wide Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening.","authors":"Geert A Martens,Dieter De Smet,Guy Froyen,Koen Swaerts,Annick Daniels,Elke Boone,Pieter-Jan Volders,Katrien De Mulder,Ellen Geerdens,Severine Berden,Jense Wils,Pauline Herroelen,Henk Louagie,Brigitte Maes","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening exhibits higher sensitivity and lower false-positive rates (FPRs) compared to combined first-trimester screening for common trisomies. However, additional anomalies on other autosomes detected by genome-wide assays cause anxiety and trigger increased rates of amniocentesis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of software-generated digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism to identify false-positive screenings and inform posttest counseling.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 32 175 pregnancies were screened using a commercial genome-wide cffDNA screening assay alongside an open-source bioinformatics pipeline for fetal fraction and aneuploidy analysis. Amniocentesis outcomes were utilized to calculate positive predictive values (PPV) for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA), rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), and subchromosomal alterations (SA). Receiver operating characteristics and regression analysis were performed to identify read count metrics that minimize FPRs.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13, with PPV ranging from 17% (+13) to 75% (+21). For SCA, PPV varied from 50% (45, X) to 89% (47, XXY). PPV for SA was 37%. RAT were detected in 0.33% of cases with a PPV of 6.6%. A proprietary digital estimate of trophoblastic mosaicism (mosaic ratio) exhibited good diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.83-0.95) for false positives: mosaic ratio below 0.50, observed in 64% of RATs, 24% of SAs, 17% of common trisomies, and 7% of 45,X cases, was never associated with fetal aneuploidy.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDigital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism hold clinical significance for informing posttest counseling. Implementing these recommendations could reduce invasive testing for RAT from 0.33% to 0.11%.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening exhibits higher sensitivity and lower false-positive rates (FPRs) compared to combined first-trimester screening for common trisomies. However, additional anomalies on other autosomes detected by genome-wide assays cause anxiety and trigger increased rates of amniocentesis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of software-generated digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism to identify false-positive screenings and inform posttest counseling.
METHODS
A total of 32 175 pregnancies were screened using a commercial genome-wide cffDNA screening assay alongside an open-source bioinformatics pipeline for fetal fraction and aneuploidy analysis. Amniocentesis outcomes were utilized to calculate positive predictive values (PPV) for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA), rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), and subchromosomal alterations (SA). Receiver operating characteristics and regression analysis were performed to identify read count metrics that minimize FPRs.
RESULTS
The assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13, with PPV ranging from 17% (+13) to 75% (+21). For SCA, PPV varied from 50% (45, X) to 89% (47, XXY). PPV for SA was 37%. RAT were detected in 0.33% of cases with a PPV of 6.6%. A proprietary digital estimate of trophoblastic mosaicism (mosaic ratio) exhibited good diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.83-0.95) for false positives: mosaic ratio below 0.50, observed in 64% of RATs, 24% of SAs, 17% of common trisomies, and 7% of 45,X cases, was never associated with fetal aneuploidy.
CONCLUSIONS
Digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism hold clinical significance for informing posttest counseling. Implementing these recommendations could reduce invasive testing for RAT from 0.33% to 0.11%.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.