Comparative study of dermatologists and deep learning model on diagnosing childhood vitiligo

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Shijuan Yu , Zhilin Chen , Jingyi He , Hua Wang
{"title":"Comparative study of dermatologists and deep learning model on diagnosing childhood vitiligo","authors":"Shijuan Yu ,&nbsp;Zhilin Chen ,&nbsp;Jingyi He ,&nbsp;Hua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on dermoscopy images in diagnosing childhood vitiligo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 474 pediatric patients (223 with vitiligo and 251 without vitiligo) were enrolled. Three types of imaging data were collected: dermoscopic images, Wood’s lamp images, and standard clinical photographs. Two diagnostic evaluation approaches were established. Clinician-based assessment: Eight dermatologists performed a double-blind evaluation using dermoscopic images. DL-based assessment: ResNet152 and DenseNet121 models were trained on 3896 dermoscopic images (with an 8:2 split between the development set and validation set). The evaluation metrics included the AUC of ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between clinicians’ diagnostic performance and their years of experience was analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ROC curve analysis revealed that using the training questionnaire as a control group, the diagnostic performance of dermatologists for vitiligo based solely on dermoscopy images yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.51–1.00), sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.99), and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.96). The confusion matrix for the ResNet152 model indicated an accuracy of 83.08 %, a recall rate of 86.84 %, a precision of 81.08 %, a specificity of 79.22 %, an F1 score of 0.8386, and an AUC of 0.91. The confusion matrix for the DenseNet121 model indicated an accuracy of 81.41 % and a recall rate of 83.41 % (precision: 82.03 %, specificity: 79.12 %, F1 score: 0.8271, and AUC: 0.89).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both DL models based on dermoscopy images exhibit high overall classification performance in the diagnosis of childhood vitiligo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 104727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025002595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on dermoscopy images in diagnosing childhood vitiligo.

Methods

A total of 474 pediatric patients (223 with vitiligo and 251 without vitiligo) were enrolled. Three types of imaging data were collected: dermoscopic images, Wood’s lamp images, and standard clinical photographs. Two diagnostic evaluation approaches were established. Clinician-based assessment: Eight dermatologists performed a double-blind evaluation using dermoscopic images. DL-based assessment: ResNet152 and DenseNet121 models were trained on 3896 dermoscopic images (with an 8:2 split between the development set and validation set). The evaluation metrics included the AUC of ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between clinicians’ diagnostic performance and their years of experience was analyzed.

Results

ROC curve analysis revealed that using the training questionnaire as a control group, the diagnostic performance of dermatologists for vitiligo based solely on dermoscopy images yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.51–1.00), sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.99), and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.96). The confusion matrix for the ResNet152 model indicated an accuracy of 83.08 %, a recall rate of 86.84 %, a precision of 81.08 %, a specificity of 79.22 %, an F1 score of 0.8386, and an AUC of 0.91. The confusion matrix for the DenseNet121 model indicated an accuracy of 81.41 % and a recall rate of 83.41 % (precision: 82.03 %, specificity: 79.12 %, F1 score: 0.8271, and AUC: 0.89).

Conclusion

Both DL models based on dermoscopy images exhibit high overall classification performance in the diagnosis of childhood vitiligo.
皮肤科医师与深度学习模型诊断儿童白癜风的比较研究。
目的:探讨基于皮肤镜图像的深度学习模型在儿童白癜风诊断中的应用。方法:共纳入474例儿科患者(白癜风223例,非白癜风251例)。收集了三种类型的影像学资料:皮肤镜图像、Wood’s lamp图像和标准临床照片。建立了两种诊断评价方法。基于临床的评估:8位皮肤科医生使用皮肤镜图像进行双盲评估。基于dl的评估:ResNet152和DenseNet121模型在3896张皮肤镜图像上进行训练(开发集和验证集之间的比例为8:2)。评价指标包括ROC曲线AUC、敏感性、特异性、f1评分和准确性。此外,我们还分析了临床医生的诊断表现与其多年经验之间的相关性。结果:ROC曲线分析显示,以培训问卷为对照组,皮肤科医生仅基于皮肤镜图像诊断白癜风的AUC为0.77 (95% CI: 0.51-1.00),敏感性为0.88 (95% CI: 0.53-0.99),特异性为0.75 (95% CI: 0.41-0.96)。ResNet152模型的混淆矩阵显示,准确率为83.08%,召回率为86.84%,准确率为81.08%,特异性为79.22%,F1评分为0.8386,AUC为0.91。DenseNet121模型的混淆矩阵显示准确率为81.41%,召回率为83.41%(精密度为82.03%,特异度为79.12%,F1评分为0.8271,AUC为0.89)。结论:两种基于皮肤镜图像的DL模型在诊断儿童白癜风方面均具有较高的整体分类性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信