Optimization of Ketamine/Xylazine Anesthesia in Geriatric Mice.

Sidney Beecy, Desiree Meuse, Nicole Kizielewicz, Corinna Beale, Denise Molk
{"title":"Optimization of Ketamine/Xylazine Anesthesia in Geriatric Mice.","authors":"Sidney Beecy, Desiree Meuse, Nicole Kizielewicz, Corinna Beale, Denise Molk","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aged mice are becoming increasingly important models for human senescence. Many studies require anesthesia. Standard rodent ketamine/xylazine injectable regimens have been associated with increased incidences of death, unreliable surgical planes, and prolonged recoveries in geriatric mice. We hypothesized that the addition of atipamezole reversal and higher doses of ketamine or xylazine would result in a more reliable surgical plane of anesthesia and quicker recovery in geriatric mice without increasing mortality. Mice (n = 6 per group) were subjected to one of 3 anesthetic regimens: 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine without reversal (Standard); 150 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine with 1 mg/kg atipamezole reversal (High Ketamine); or 100 mg/kg ketamine and 15 mg/kg xylazine with 1 mg/kg atipamezole reversal (High Xylazine). While anesthetized, righting reflex, pedal withdrawal reflex, heart rate, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and temperature were recorded. While both experimental groups provided a more consistent surgical plane of anesthesia, the High Ketamine group had both the longest anesthetic period and the highest mortality (33.3%). The High Xylazine group had moderate mortality (16.6%) and a comparable anesthetic period to the Standard regimen, along with a superior SpO2 to both groups. Atipamezole reversal led to a faster return of righting reflex and an increase in SpO2 but did not affect the total length of recovery compared with the Standard group that did not include a reversal agent. Overall, the High Xylazine group provided a more reliable surgical plane to the Standard group in geriatric mice but increased mortality (16.6%), and the addition of atipamezole as a reversal agent did not significantly change the length of recovery. The information gained from this study can help guide decisions regarding the use of ketamine and xylazine in geriatric mice for surgical procedures or lengthy procedures for which redosing might be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aged mice are becoming increasingly important models for human senescence. Many studies require anesthesia. Standard rodent ketamine/xylazine injectable regimens have been associated with increased incidences of death, unreliable surgical planes, and prolonged recoveries in geriatric mice. We hypothesized that the addition of atipamezole reversal and higher doses of ketamine or xylazine would result in a more reliable surgical plane of anesthesia and quicker recovery in geriatric mice without increasing mortality. Mice (n = 6 per group) were subjected to one of 3 anesthetic regimens: 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine without reversal (Standard); 150 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine with 1 mg/kg atipamezole reversal (High Ketamine); or 100 mg/kg ketamine and 15 mg/kg xylazine with 1 mg/kg atipamezole reversal (High Xylazine). While anesthetized, righting reflex, pedal withdrawal reflex, heart rate, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and temperature were recorded. While both experimental groups provided a more consistent surgical plane of anesthesia, the High Ketamine group had both the longest anesthetic period and the highest mortality (33.3%). The High Xylazine group had moderate mortality (16.6%) and a comparable anesthetic period to the Standard regimen, along with a superior SpO2 to both groups. Atipamezole reversal led to a faster return of righting reflex and an increase in SpO2 but did not affect the total length of recovery compared with the Standard group that did not include a reversal agent. Overall, the High Xylazine group provided a more reliable surgical plane to the Standard group in geriatric mice but increased mortality (16.6%), and the addition of atipamezole as a reversal agent did not significantly change the length of recovery. The information gained from this study can help guide decisions regarding the use of ketamine and xylazine in geriatric mice for surgical procedures or lengthy procedures for which redosing might be necessary.

老年小鼠氯胺酮/噻嗪麻醉的优化。
老年小鼠正日益成为研究人类衰老的重要模型。许多研究需要麻醉。标准的啮齿动物氯胺酮/噻嗪注射方案与老年小鼠死亡率增加、手术平面不可靠和恢复时间延长有关。我们假设,增加阿替帕唑逆转和更高剂量的氯胺酮或噻嗪将导致更可靠的手术麻醉平面和更快的恢复,而不会增加老年小鼠的死亡率。小鼠(每组6只)接受三种麻醉方案中的一种:100 mg/kg氯胺酮和10 mg/kg噻嗪,无逆转(标准);150mg /kg氯胺酮和10mg /kg噻嗪伴1mg /kg阿替帕唑逆转(高氯胺酮);或100mg /kg氯胺酮和15mg /kg噻嗪,并用1mg /kg阿替帕唑反转(高噻嗪)。麻醉时记录翻正反射、退足反射、心率、呼吸频率、动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)、体温。虽然两个实验组提供了更一致的手术麻醉平面,但高氯胺酮组麻醉时间最长,死亡率最高(33.3%)。高剂量噻嗪组死亡率中等(16.6%),麻醉时间与标准方案相当,SpO2优于两组。与不使用逆转剂的标准组相比,阿替帕唑逆转导致翻正反射的更快恢复和SpO2的增加,但不影响恢复的总时间。总体而言,在老年小鼠中,高剂量噻嗪组提供了比标准组更可靠的手术平面,但增加了死亡率(16.6%),并且添加阿替帕唑作为逆转剂并没有显著改变恢复时间。从这项研究中获得的信息可以帮助指导老年小鼠在外科手术或可能需要重新给药的漫长过程中使用氯胺酮和噻嗪的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信