Evaluation of Sentinel-Free Soiled Bedding as a Replacement for Direct Sampling in PCR Detection of Rodent Pathogens during Quarantine.

Allie Feinberg, Kourtney P Nickerson, Cheryl L Woods, David Reimer, Kenneth S Henderson, Robert P Andersen, Bhupinder Singh
{"title":"Evaluation of Sentinel-Free Soiled Bedding as a Replacement for Direct Sampling in PCR Detection of Rodent Pathogens during Quarantine.","authors":"Allie Feinberg, Kourtney P Nickerson, Cheryl L Woods, David Reimer, Kenneth S Henderson, Robert P Andersen, Bhupinder Singh","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing a screening method for rodent pathogens is an integral component of an institution's rodent health surveillance program. Most rodent quarantine programs use direct colony sampling (DCS) from live animals for pathogen PCR testing. DCS may elicit undue stress to the animal and be time consuming, contingent on the number of quarantined animals. Sentinel-free soiled bedding (SFSB) sampling has previously been used to monitor the pathogen status of research rodents. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of an SFSB-based quarantine by comparing it to DCS for the evaluation of pet shop mice of different age ranges. Enhanced detection by SFSB for the 6- to 10-wk age range supported further investigation. The subsequent main study evaluated whether SFSB sampling is as effective as traditional DCS for detecting rodent pathogens. We hypothesized that SFSB contact media sampling is either equivalent to or more effective than DCS for detecting pathogens in quarantined mice. The study included mice imported from various institutions between October 2023 and August 2024. The DCS and exposed contact media were tested using PCR analyses. The total number of positive agent assay detections by DCS was 157, compared with 173 with the SFSB method. These results suggest that contact media sampling provides equivalent or superior detection of rodent pathogens compared with the DCS method. Although not statistically significant, it was observed that delaying sample submission decreased detection rates for 2 RNA viruses: 80% for murine astrovirus-1 (MuAstV1; 4 out of 5 samples) and 67% for genogroup V norovirus (MNV; 4 out of 6 samples). Immediate submission restored the detection rate to 100% for MuAstV1 and 91% for MNV. To conclude, SFSB rapid submission during quarantine provides a reliable and effective alternative to the traditional DCS method for the detection of rodent pathogens. This nonintrusive methodology mitigates stress during sampling while enhancing the effectiveness and sensitivity of pathogen detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-25-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing a screening method for rodent pathogens is an integral component of an institution's rodent health surveillance program. Most rodent quarantine programs use direct colony sampling (DCS) from live animals for pathogen PCR testing. DCS may elicit undue stress to the animal and be time consuming, contingent on the number of quarantined animals. Sentinel-free soiled bedding (SFSB) sampling has previously been used to monitor the pathogen status of research rodents. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of an SFSB-based quarantine by comparing it to DCS for the evaluation of pet shop mice of different age ranges. Enhanced detection by SFSB for the 6- to 10-wk age range supported further investigation. The subsequent main study evaluated whether SFSB sampling is as effective as traditional DCS for detecting rodent pathogens. We hypothesized that SFSB contact media sampling is either equivalent to or more effective than DCS for detecting pathogens in quarantined mice. The study included mice imported from various institutions between October 2023 and August 2024. The DCS and exposed contact media were tested using PCR analyses. The total number of positive agent assay detections by DCS was 157, compared with 173 with the SFSB method. These results suggest that contact media sampling provides equivalent or superior detection of rodent pathogens compared with the DCS method. Although not statistically significant, it was observed that delaying sample submission decreased detection rates for 2 RNA viruses: 80% for murine astrovirus-1 (MuAstV1; 4 out of 5 samples) and 67% for genogroup V norovirus (MNV; 4 out of 6 samples). Immediate submission restored the detection rate to 100% for MuAstV1 and 91% for MNV. To conclude, SFSB rapid submission during quarantine provides a reliable and effective alternative to the traditional DCS method for the detection of rodent pathogens. This nonintrusive methodology mitigates stress during sampling while enhancing the effectiveness and sensitivity of pathogen detection.

无哨脏垫料替代直接取样在检疫期鼠病原PCR检测中的应用评价。
建立啮齿动物病原体筛选方法是机构啮齿动物健康监测计划的一个组成部分。大多数啮齿动物检疫程序使用活体动物的直接菌落取样(DCS)进行病原体PCR检测。根据被隔离动物的数量,DCS可能对动物造成不适当的压力,并且耗时。无哨兵床上物(SFSB)取样以前被用于监测研究啮齿动物的病原体状况。进行了一项试点研究,以确定基于sfsb的检疫的可行性,将其与DCS进行比较,以评估不同年龄范围的宠物店小鼠。SFSB对6- 10周龄范围的增强检测支持进一步的研究。随后的主要研究评估了SFSB取样在检测啮齿动物病原体方面是否与传统DCS一样有效。我们假设SFSB接触介质取样在检测隔离小鼠病原体方面相当于或比DCS更有效。该研究包括2023年10月至2024年8月期间从各机构进口的小鼠。采用PCR方法检测DCS和暴露的接触介质。DCS法检测到的阳性试剂总数为157个,而SFSB法检测到的阳性试剂总数为173个。这些结果表明,与DCS方法相比,接触介质取样对啮齿动物病原体的检测效果相当或更好。虽然没有统计学意义,但观察到延迟提交样本降低了2种RNA病毒的检出率:小鼠astrovirus-1 (MuAstV1;5个样本中有4个)和67%的基因组V诺如病毒(MNV;6个样本中的4个)。立即提交将MuAstV1的检出率恢复到100%,MNV的检出率恢复到91%。综上所述,SFSB在检疫期间快速提交是一种可靠有效的方法,可以替代传统的DCS方法检测啮齿动物病原体。这种非侵入性方法减轻了采样过程中的压力,同时提高了病原体检测的有效性和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信