{"title":"\"Relationship between insertion torque and ISQ of 600 implants placed in soft bone with different surgical techniques.\" IN VITRO STUDY.","authors":"Clarisse Brunel, Sonnica Galan-Gil, Celia Carrillo Garcia, Sonia Sánchez Carilla","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary stability plays a crucial role in implant success as it is influenced by bone characteristics, surgical techniques and implant design. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between implant stability quotient (ISQ) and insertion torque (IT) in dental implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro, cross-sectional, analytical study was carried out. For the study, polyurethane blocks simulating type IV bone were used, in which dental implants from 5 different commercial brands were placed. 600 osteotomies were performed, divided into three groups of 200 samples each. The 3 groups corresponded to three different surgical techniques: underdrilling, osteotomes, and osseodensification. Implants of the five brands were equally distributed in each group. ISQ and IT were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An inverse relationship was observed between IT and ISQ, indicating that higher insertion torque was associated with lower ISQ values. However, this relationship was weak. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference that the ISQ values of the three groups of surgical techniques were significantly different. Regarding the analysis of the macro-design of the implants, it was found that implants with conical design, and threads with variable depths had a significantly higher ISQ than those with hybrid design and threads with constant depths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The correlation between IT and ISQ is inverse, but the relationship is weak; is due to the fact that ISQ and IT measure different aspects of stability, so are considered complementary parameters for assessing the primary stability of the implant. The surgical placement technique has no significant impact on primary stability, but the type of implant macro-design has a significant influence on it.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary stability plays a crucial role in implant success as it is influenced by bone characteristics, surgical techniques and implant design. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between implant stability quotient (ISQ) and insertion torque (IT) in dental implants.
Materials and methods: An in vitro, cross-sectional, analytical study was carried out. For the study, polyurethane blocks simulating type IV bone were used, in which dental implants from 5 different commercial brands were placed. 600 osteotomies were performed, divided into three groups of 200 samples each. The 3 groups corresponded to three different surgical techniques: underdrilling, osteotomes, and osseodensification. Implants of the five brands were equally distributed in each group. ISQ and IT were measured.
Results: An inverse relationship was observed between IT and ISQ, indicating that higher insertion torque was associated with lower ISQ values. However, this relationship was weak. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference that the ISQ values of the three groups of surgical techniques were significantly different. Regarding the analysis of the macro-design of the implants, it was found that implants with conical design, and threads with variable depths had a significantly higher ISQ than those with hybrid design and threads with constant depths.
Conclusions: The correlation between IT and ISQ is inverse, but the relationship is weak; is due to the fact that ISQ and IT measure different aspects of stability, so are considered complementary parameters for assessing the primary stability of the implant. The surgical placement technique has no significant impact on primary stability, but the type of implant macro-design has a significant influence on it.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.