Behavioral Foundations for CBPE: Using the BCW to Advance Individual Readiness to Change.

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Denise H Rhoney, Aleda M H Chen, Eunice Chung, Mariann D Churchwell, Kimberly K Daugherty, Erika L Kleppinger, Nicholas R Nelson, Dennis Parker, Stephanie L Sibicky, Cindy D Stowe, Krisy-Ann Thornby, Nidhi Gandhi-Patel
{"title":"Behavioral Foundations for CBPE: Using the BCW to Advance Individual Readiness to Change.","authors":"Denise H Rhoney, Aleda M H Chen, Eunice Chung, Mariann D Churchwell, Kimberly K Daugherty, Erika L Kleppinger, Nicholas R Nelson, Dennis Parker, Stephanie L Sibicky, Cindy D Stowe, Krisy-Ann Thornby, Nidhi Gandhi-Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Academic Affairs Committee (2024-2025) was charged with supporting the implementation of competency-based pharmacy education (CBPE) by developing a validated readiness-to-change instrument and offering recommendations to guide adoption. Recognizing that change requires both organizational support and individual engagement, the committee applied established behavior change frameworks, including the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model and the behavior change wheel, to define the actions needed from faculty, administrators, preceptors, and learners. These behaviors align with the 5 core components of CBPE: (1) outcome competencies that are clearly articulated, measurable, and transparent; (2) progressive sequencing of competencies across the curriculum with defined developmental markers; (3) authentic learning experiences embedded throughout the curriculum; (4) learner-centric, competency-focused instruction with individualized learning plans; and (5) longitudinal assessment practices that document competency acquisition and progression. A national Delphi panel and stakeholder focus groups informed the development of the instrument. Additional data gathered at the 2025 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Interim Meeting showed general support for CBPE but also identified challenges such as limited faculty familiarity, insufficient resources, gaps in technological infrastructure, and uncertainty around assessment methods. Based on these findings, the committee presents practical recommendations, including faculty development, systems alignment, and leadership support. The report emphasizes that meaningful progress requires coordinated efforts across institutions and roles-built through collaboration, sustained by inclusive leadership, and shaped by the voices of those responsible for teaching and learning. With the right educational infrastructure and stakeholder engagement, CBPE can be effectively implemented to better meet the needs of learners, the profession, and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Academic Affairs Committee (2024-2025) was charged with supporting the implementation of competency-based pharmacy education (CBPE) by developing a validated readiness-to-change instrument and offering recommendations to guide adoption. Recognizing that change requires both organizational support and individual engagement, the committee applied established behavior change frameworks, including the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model and the behavior change wheel, to define the actions needed from faculty, administrators, preceptors, and learners. These behaviors align with the 5 core components of CBPE: (1) outcome competencies that are clearly articulated, measurable, and transparent; (2) progressive sequencing of competencies across the curriculum with defined developmental markers; (3) authentic learning experiences embedded throughout the curriculum; (4) learner-centric, competency-focused instruction with individualized learning plans; and (5) longitudinal assessment practices that document competency acquisition and progression. A national Delphi panel and stakeholder focus groups informed the development of the instrument. Additional data gathered at the 2025 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Interim Meeting showed general support for CBPE but also identified challenges such as limited faculty familiarity, insufficient resources, gaps in technological infrastructure, and uncertainty around assessment methods. Based on these findings, the committee presents practical recommendations, including faculty development, systems alignment, and leadership support. The report emphasizes that meaningful progress requires coordinated efforts across institutions and roles-built through collaboration, sustained by inclusive leadership, and shaped by the voices of those responsible for teaching and learning. With the right educational infrastructure and stakeholder engagement, CBPE can be effectively implemented to better meet the needs of learners, the profession, and society.

CBPE的行为基础:利用BCW促进个人改变的准备。
AACP学术事务委员会(2024-2025)负责通过开发经过验证的变更准备工具并提供指导采用的建议来支持实施基于能力的药学教育(CBPE)。认识到变革既需要组织的支持,也需要个人的参与,委员会应用了已建立的行为改变框架,包括COM-B模型和行为改变轮,来定义教师、管理人员、导师和学习者需要采取的行动。这些行为符合CBPE的五个核心组成部分:(1)明确表达、可衡量和透明的结果能力;(2)以明确的发展标记对课程能力进行递进排序;(3)贯穿课程的真实学习体验;(4)以学习者为中心、以能力为中心的个性化学习计划教学;(5)记录能力获取和进步的纵向评估实践。全国德尔菲小组和利益相关者焦点小组为该工具的开发提供了信息。在2025年AACP临时会议上收集的其他数据显示,CBPE得到了普遍支持,但也指出了一些挑战,如教师熟悉程度有限、资源不足、技术基础设施存在差距以及评估方法的不确定性。根据这些发现,委员会提出了切实可行的建议,包括教师发展、系统协调和领导力支持。报告强调,有意义的进展需要各机构和各角色之间的协调努力,通过合作建立,由包容性领导维持,并由负责教与学的人的声音塑造。有了合适的教育基础设施和利益相关者的参与,CBPE可以有效地实施,以更好地满足学习者、专业和社会的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信