Ethical dilemmas experienced by midwives in their professional practice in Northwestern Ethiopia: a phenomenological interview study.

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Tadesse Getu, Ayenew Tega, Getie Mihret Aragaw, Misgana Desalegn Menesho, Robel Demelash, Habtamu Wale, Zemenu Addis
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas experienced by midwives in their professional practice in Northwestern Ethiopia: a phenomenological interview study.","authors":"Tadesse Getu, Ayenew Tega, Getie Mihret Aragaw, Misgana Desalegn Menesho, Robel Demelash, Habtamu Wale, Zemenu Addis","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01266-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical dilemmas in healthcare arise from conflicts among ethical beliefs, duties, principles, and theories. Midwives face ethical dilemmas in their clinical practice, where their decisions significantly affect the well-being of mothers and infants. However, there is a scarcity of data about midwives' experience of ethical dilemmas in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by midwives in their professional practice in northwestern Ethiopia, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was conducted from December 2023 to January 2024 in three referral hospitals in northwest Ethiopia. A purposive sampling technique was used to select fourteen midwives with at least two years of clinical experience. In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method with the support of Atlas.ti version 23.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes and ten sub-themes emerged from participants: Cultural and religious views, including religious beliefs versus abortion care and cultural constraints on women's autonomy; Confidentiality and communication, particularly dilemmas around truth-telling versus preventing harm and confidentiality versus preventing harm; Autonomy versus beneficence, including patient refusal of care and maternal-fetal conflicts; Unsafe work environments, such as personal safety versus professional duty and resource constraint versus highest quality care; and Professional role conflict, including limited decision-making power and restricted practice. Midwives addressed these dilemmas through consultation and negotiation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that midwives faced various ethical dilemmas in their professional practice resulting from the interface of personal values, cultural influences, institutional limitations, and professional roles. These dilemmas significantly impacted their ability to provide respectful, autonomous, and equitable care. Promoting ethical competence, empowering midwives, and encouraging supportive institutional structures are essential for improving ethical decision-making and the quality of maternal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01266-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethical dilemmas in healthcare arise from conflicts among ethical beliefs, duties, principles, and theories. Midwives face ethical dilemmas in their clinical practice, where their decisions significantly affect the well-being of mothers and infants. However, there is a scarcity of data about midwives' experience of ethical dilemmas in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by midwives in their professional practice in northwestern Ethiopia, 2024.

Methods: A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was conducted from December 2023 to January 2024 in three referral hospitals in northwest Ethiopia. A purposive sampling technique was used to select fourteen midwives with at least two years of clinical experience. In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis method with the support of Atlas.ti version 23.

Results: Five major themes and ten sub-themes emerged from participants: Cultural and religious views, including religious beliefs versus abortion care and cultural constraints on women's autonomy; Confidentiality and communication, particularly dilemmas around truth-telling versus preventing harm and confidentiality versus preventing harm; Autonomy versus beneficence, including patient refusal of care and maternal-fetal conflicts; Unsafe work environments, such as personal safety versus professional duty and resource constraint versus highest quality care; and Professional role conflict, including limited decision-making power and restricted practice. Midwives addressed these dilemmas through consultation and negotiation strategies.

Conclusion: This study showed that midwives faced various ethical dilemmas in their professional practice resulting from the interface of personal values, cultural influences, institutional limitations, and professional roles. These dilemmas significantly impacted their ability to provide respectful, autonomous, and equitable care. Promoting ethical competence, empowering midwives, and encouraging supportive institutional structures are essential for improving ethical decision-making and the quality of maternal care.

埃塞俄比亚西北部助产士在专业实践中所经历的伦理困境:现象学访谈研究。
背景:医疗保健中的伦理困境是由伦理信仰、伦理责任、伦理原则和伦理理论之间的冲突引起的。助产士在临床实践中面临伦理困境,他们的决定显著影响母亲和婴儿的福祉。然而,关于埃塞俄比亚助产士道德困境经历的数据缺乏。本研究的目的是探讨2024年埃塞俄比亚西北部助产士在专业实践中面临的道德困境。方法:采用现象学方法于2023年12月至2024年1月在埃塞俄比亚西北部三家转诊医院进行定性研究。有目的的抽样技术被用来选择14名助产士至少两年的临床经验。深入,面对面,半结构化访谈进行收集数据。在Atlas的支持下,采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。Ti版本23。结果:参与者提出了5个主要主题和10个副主题:文化和宗教观,包括宗教信仰与堕胎护理和妇女自主的文化约束;保密性和沟通,特别是关于说真话和防止伤害以及保密性和防止伤害之间的困境;自主与慈善,包括病人拒绝护理和母胎冲突;不安全的工作环境,例如个人安全与专业职责、资源限制与最高质量护理;职业角色冲突,包括有限的决策权和受限的实践。助产士通过协商和谈判策略来解决这些困境。结论:本研究表明,由于个人价值观、文化影响、制度限制和职业角色的相互作用,助产士在专业实践中面临着各种各样的伦理困境。这些困境严重影响了他们提供尊重、自主和公平护理的能力。促进道德能力、赋予助产士权力和鼓励支持性机构结构,对于改善道德决策和孕产妇保健质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信