Nanyangwe Siuluta, Christina E Parisi, Shantrel S Candidate, Jacqueline Sherbuk, Yan Wang, Maya Widmeyer, Charurut Somboonwit, Jessy G Dévieux, Robert L Cook, Natalie E Chichetto
{"title":"Alcohol reduction strategies among persons with hiv: past attempts, self-reported effectiveness, and future strategies of interest.","authors":"Nanyangwe Siuluta, Christina E Parisi, Shantrel S Candidate, Jacqueline Sherbuk, Yan Wang, Maya Widmeyer, Charurut Somboonwit, Jessy G Dévieux, Robert L Cook, Natalie E Chichetto","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00581-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol consumption is associated with poor health outcomes in people with HIV (PWH). Although various alcohol reduction strategies exist, little is known about PWH's past experiences or future preferences. This study describes the previous strategies PWH had used, their perceived effectiveness, among people who ever drank, and the strategies PWH who endorsed heavy drinking would consider trying in the future. It also examines how these experiences and preferences vary by sociodemographic factors and past 12 month drug use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 453 PWH enrolled in the Florida Cohort Wave III study (2020-2023; mean age 50 years, 60% men). Participants who attempted to reduce or quit drinking (n = 321) were asked about their use of eight alcohol reduction strategies and rated the effectiveness of each on a 4-point Likert scale. Participants reporting heavy drinking (n = 170) were asked about their willingness to try seven strategies in the future. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests analyzed differences by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and past 12 month drug use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 321 who had ever tried to reduce or quit drinking, endorsed strategies including \"on my own\"/ complete cessation (80%), prayer (61%), Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) (38%), counseling/therapy (31%), inpatient/outpatient detox (23%), self-monitoring (11%), and medication (7%). The strategies with the highest self-reported effectiveness were for prayer (59%), \"on my own\"/ complete cessation (58%), and in-patient detox (50%). Prayer was significantly more common among females and non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic participants. Those with past 12 month drug use were significantly more likely to have tried most strategies, except medications or prayer. Among 170 who reported heavy drinking, \"on my own\"/ complete cessation (43%), AA (24%), and counseling/therapy (21%) were the most endorsed strategies they would try in the future. No significant differences in future preferences were found by demographics, but those with past 12 month drug use showed more interest in formal treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Commonly used alcohol reduction strategies among PWH were non-medical, easily accessible, and perceived as very effective. Incorporating safe and effective patient-driven methods into treatment guidelines may improve strategy uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00581-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Alcohol consumption is associated with poor health outcomes in people with HIV (PWH). Although various alcohol reduction strategies exist, little is known about PWH's past experiences or future preferences. This study describes the previous strategies PWH had used, their perceived effectiveness, among people who ever drank, and the strategies PWH who endorsed heavy drinking would consider trying in the future. It also examines how these experiences and preferences vary by sociodemographic factors and past 12 month drug use.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 453 PWH enrolled in the Florida Cohort Wave III study (2020-2023; mean age 50 years, 60% men). Participants who attempted to reduce or quit drinking (n = 321) were asked about their use of eight alcohol reduction strategies and rated the effectiveness of each on a 4-point Likert scale. Participants reporting heavy drinking (n = 170) were asked about their willingness to try seven strategies in the future. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests analyzed differences by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and past 12 month drug use.
Results: Among the 321 who had ever tried to reduce or quit drinking, endorsed strategies including "on my own"/ complete cessation (80%), prayer (61%), Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) (38%), counseling/therapy (31%), inpatient/outpatient detox (23%), self-monitoring (11%), and medication (7%). The strategies with the highest self-reported effectiveness were for prayer (59%), "on my own"/ complete cessation (58%), and in-patient detox (50%). Prayer was significantly more common among females and non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic participants. Those with past 12 month drug use were significantly more likely to have tried most strategies, except medications or prayer. Among 170 who reported heavy drinking, "on my own"/ complete cessation (43%), AA (24%), and counseling/therapy (21%) were the most endorsed strategies they would try in the future. No significant differences in future preferences were found by demographics, but those with past 12 month drug use showed more interest in formal treatment approaches.
Conclusion: Commonly used alcohol reduction strategies among PWH were non-medical, easily accessible, and perceived as very effective. Incorporating safe and effective patient-driven methods into treatment guidelines may improve strategy uptake.
期刊介绍:
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations.
Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.