Testing the HAPA model for predicting daily physical activity of women survivors of breast cancer.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Margarida Sequeira, Cícero Pereira, Maria-João Alvarez
{"title":"Testing the HAPA model for predicting daily physical activity of women survivors of breast cancer.","authors":"Margarida Sequeira, Cícero Pereira, Maria-João Alvarez","doi":"10.1177/13591053251347143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The power of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) for understanding interindividual health outcomes is well-documented. However, its applicability in explaining intraindividual evolution of constructs over time remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap by conducting nine longitudinal N-of-1 studies to estimate how the HAPA constructs predict physical activity (PA) at the intraindividual level in breast cancer survivors over-time. PA actual behaviors (<i>N</i> = 338) of nine women survivors of breast cancer were observed over 6-weeks, and associations between HAPA constructs and PA were analyzed longitudinally. Time-series regression analyses revealed that self-efficacy and social-support significantly predicted participants' intention to engage PA. Recovery self-efficacy emerged as predictor of PA in three studies, while planning was predictor in one. Future interventions targeting PA after breast cancer should consider individual and daily variations, and should focus self-efficacy, social-support, and planning. This highlights the importance of tailoring interventions to promote PA to specific and individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053251347143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251347143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The power of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) for understanding interindividual health outcomes is well-documented. However, its applicability in explaining intraindividual evolution of constructs over time remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap by conducting nine longitudinal N-of-1 studies to estimate how the HAPA constructs predict physical activity (PA) at the intraindividual level in breast cancer survivors over-time. PA actual behaviors (N = 338) of nine women survivors of breast cancer were observed over 6-weeks, and associations between HAPA constructs and PA were analyzed longitudinally. Time-series regression analyses revealed that self-efficacy and social-support significantly predicted participants' intention to engage PA. Recovery self-efficacy emerged as predictor of PA in three studies, while planning was predictor in one. Future interventions targeting PA after breast cancer should consider individual and daily variations, and should focus self-efficacy, social-support, and planning. This highlights the importance of tailoring interventions to promote PA to specific and individual needs.

测试HAPA模型预测女性乳腺癌幸存者的日常体力活动。
卫生行动过程方法(HAPA)在了解个体间健康结果方面的力量有据可查。然而,它在解释个体内部结构随时间演变的适用性仍有待研究。本研究通过进行9项纵向N-of-1研究来估计HAPA结构如何在个体水平上预测乳腺癌幸存者的身体活动(PA),从而解决了这一差距。对9名乳腺癌女性幸存者的PA实际行为(N = 338)进行为期6周的观察,并纵向分析HAPA结构与PA之间的关系。时间序列回归分析显示,自我效能感和社会支持显著预测了被试参与个人护理的意向。在三项研究中,恢复自我效能是预测因子,而计划在一项研究中是预测因子。未来针对乳腺癌后PA的干预措施应考虑个体和日常变化,并应关注自我效能感、社会支持和规划。这突出了调整干预措施以促进PA满足具体和个人需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信