Yafei Wu, Harry Qin, Shengnan Wang, Qingling Yang, Yan Zhang, Harry Haoxiang Wang, Yao Jie Xie
{"title":"Predictors of migraine prevalence among different age groups in Hong Kong Chinese women: Machine learning analyses on the MECH-HK cohort.","authors":"Yafei Wu, Harry Qin, Shengnan Wang, Qingling Yang, Yan Zhang, Harry Haoxiang Wang, Yao Jie Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify age-specific predictors of migraine prevalence among Chinese women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, 54 predictors were collected from the MECH-HK cohort. Migraine was assessed by the ICHD 3rd edition. Machine learning was employed to select a streamlined subset of predictors. Participants were categorised as young and middle age group (<60 years) and old age group (≥60 years) for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 54.3 years. Migraine prevalence was higher in women under 60 than in older women (10.7% vs. 6.0%, P< 0.001). Lasso selected seven (<60 years) and twelve (≥60 years) predictors, respectively. The top three predictors among women under 60 were fatigue, migraine family history, and PSQI, explaining 6.6%, 5.0%, and 4.9% of variation, respectively. Their ORs (95% CIs) were 1.61 (1.37-1.89), 3.93 (2.77-5.57), and 1.29 (1.12-1.48), respectively. For older women, the top three predictors were experience of hunger, smartphone usage time, and migraine family history, explaining 2.0%, 1.8%, and 1.6% of variation, respectively, with ORs (95% CIs) of 2.16 (1.21-3.84), 1.24 (1.03-1.48), and 2.26 (1.16-4.40), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Migraine family history and experience of hunger were shared predictors for migraine prevalence in both ages. Other predictors differentially influence migraine prevalence across ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.07.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To identify age-specific predictors of migraine prevalence among Chinese women.
Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, 54 predictors were collected from the MECH-HK cohort. Migraine was assessed by the ICHD 3rd edition. Machine learning was employed to select a streamlined subset of predictors. Participants were categorised as young and middle age group (<60 years) and old age group (≥60 years) for analysis.
Results: The mean age of participants was 54.3 years. Migraine prevalence was higher in women under 60 than in older women (10.7% vs. 6.0%, P< 0.001). Lasso selected seven (<60 years) and twelve (≥60 years) predictors, respectively. The top three predictors among women under 60 were fatigue, migraine family history, and PSQI, explaining 6.6%, 5.0%, and 4.9% of variation, respectively. Their ORs (95% CIs) were 1.61 (1.37-1.89), 3.93 (2.77-5.57), and 1.29 (1.12-1.48), respectively. For older women, the top three predictors were experience of hunger, smartphone usage time, and migraine family history, explaining 2.0%, 1.8%, and 1.6% of variation, respectively, with ORs (95% CIs) of 2.16 (1.21-3.84), 1.24 (1.03-1.48), and 2.26 (1.16-4.40), respectively.
Conclusion: Migraine family history and experience of hunger were shared predictors for migraine prevalence in both ages. Other predictors differentially influence migraine prevalence across ages.
期刊介绍:
The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.