{"title":"Validity and Reliability of a German Version of Reflux Symptom Index.","authors":"Jiri Podzimek","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a widely used self-administered questionnaire for assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). This study aimed to develop a German version of the RSI (G-RSI) and to evaluate its reliability, clinical validity, and responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included 95 patients with LPR symptoms and 60 asymptomatic control subjects. The RSI was translated into German using a forward-backward methodology. Participants completed the G-RSI at baseline (G-RSI d0), and LPR patients completed it again after 14 days (G-RSI d14) and after a 12-week treatment period (G-RSI w12). Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal validity was evaluated by comparing the G-RSI scores of patients and controls. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pretreatment and post treatment scores. The G-RSI cutoff for determining the presence or absence of LPR was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α for the G-RSI was 0.924, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). The G-RSI demonstrated high internal validity, with significant differences between patient and control scores (P < 0.001). Responsiveness was also high, with significant improvements in G-RSI scores after treatment (P < 0.001). A G-RSI cut-off value of 13 was indicative of LPR, with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The German RSI demonstrated high reproducibility, excellent clinical validity, and responsiveness after transcultural adaptation. It is a valuable tool for the initial symptom assessment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions in individuals with suspected acid LPR in outpatient clinics and primary healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a widely used self-administered questionnaire for assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). This study aimed to develop a German version of the RSI (G-RSI) and to evaluate its reliability, clinical validity, and responsiveness.
Study design: prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.
Methods: This case-control study included 95 patients with LPR symptoms and 60 asymptomatic control subjects. The RSI was translated into German using a forward-backward methodology. Participants completed the G-RSI at baseline (G-RSI d0), and LPR patients completed it again after 14 days (G-RSI d14) and after a 12-week treatment period (G-RSI w12). Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal validity was evaluated by comparing the G-RSI scores of patients and controls. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pretreatment and post treatment scores. The G-RSI cutoff for determining the presence or absence of LPR was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results: The Cronbach's α for the G-RSI was 0.924, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). The G-RSI demonstrated high internal validity, with significant differences between patient and control scores (P < 0.001). Responsiveness was also high, with significant improvements in G-RSI scores after treatment (P < 0.001). A G-RSI cut-off value of 13 was indicative of LPR, with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.5%).
Conclusions: The German RSI demonstrated high reproducibility, excellent clinical validity, and responsiveness after transcultural adaptation. It is a valuable tool for the initial symptom assessment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions in individuals with suspected acid LPR in outpatient clinics and primary healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.