Launching a Living Ethics Initiative to Explore Patients' Psychological Distress in a Highly Specialized Interdisciplinary Care Clinic.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Bénédicte D'Anjou, Katherine Desjardins, Julie Ianniruberto, Danielle Méthot, Valérie Poulin, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Eric Racine
{"title":"Launching a Living Ethics Initiative to Explore Patients' Psychological Distress in a Highly Specialized Interdisciplinary Care Clinic.","authors":"Bénédicte D'Anjou, Katherine Desjardins, Julie Ianniruberto, Danielle Méthot, Valérie Poulin, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Eric Racine","doi":"10.1177/10497323251353435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ethical issues are often difficult to discuss openly in clinical settings. However, silence can be detrimental to both patients and healthcare providers, and may impede improvements in clinical practices. In this paper, we report on the initial process of launching a living ethics initiative to identify, explore, and address a relevant ethical issue-that is, unaddressed psychological distress among people living with a rare or complex chronic disease-with the staff and patients of a highly specialized interdisciplinary care clinic in Montreal (Canada). Although previous research has addressed psychological distress, few studies have taken a participatory qualitative research and ethics approach, integrating the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers. This paper specifically outlines the initial phases of a five-phase living lab project, from identifying the issue to exploring stakeholders' understanding of the problem. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and clinic staff, followed by a qualitative content analysis that relied on deductive and inductive coding strategies. Overall, our study sheds light on the concept of psychological distress, causes of patients' psychological distress, consequences of patients' psychological distress, mitigating factors of patients' psychological distress, management of patients' psychological distress within a given healthcare environment, and potential avenues for improvement. By creating an ethical space where patients and healthcare providers could reflect on and discuss this issue, this initiative has not only deepened our understanding of patients' psychological distress but has also initiated a paradigm shift in this clinical setting, recognizing that patients' psychological distress is a fundamental human issue that concerns everyone.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251353435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251353435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethical issues are often difficult to discuss openly in clinical settings. However, silence can be detrimental to both patients and healthcare providers, and may impede improvements in clinical practices. In this paper, we report on the initial process of launching a living ethics initiative to identify, explore, and address a relevant ethical issue-that is, unaddressed psychological distress among people living with a rare or complex chronic disease-with the staff and patients of a highly specialized interdisciplinary care clinic in Montreal (Canada). Although previous research has addressed psychological distress, few studies have taken a participatory qualitative research and ethics approach, integrating the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers. This paper specifically outlines the initial phases of a five-phase living lab project, from identifying the issue to exploring stakeholders' understanding of the problem. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and clinic staff, followed by a qualitative content analysis that relied on deductive and inductive coding strategies. Overall, our study sheds light on the concept of psychological distress, causes of patients' psychological distress, consequences of patients' psychological distress, mitigating factors of patients' psychological distress, management of patients' psychological distress within a given healthcare environment, and potential avenues for improvement. By creating an ethical space where patients and healthcare providers could reflect on and discuss this issue, this initiative has not only deepened our understanding of patients' psychological distress but has also initiated a paradigm shift in this clinical setting, recognizing that patients' psychological distress is a fundamental human issue that concerns everyone.

开展一项生活伦理倡议,探讨在高度专业化的跨学科护理诊所患者的心理困扰。
伦理问题通常很难在临床环境中公开讨论。然而,沉默可能对患者和医疗保健提供者都有害,并可能阻碍临床实践的改进。在这篇论文中,我们报告了在蒙特利尔(加拿大)的一个高度专业化的跨学科护理诊所的工作人员和患者中发起一项生活伦理倡议的初步过程,该倡议旨在识别、探索和解决一个相关的伦理问题——即罕见或复杂慢性病患者中未解决的心理困扰。虽然以前的研究已经解决了心理困扰,但很少有研究采取了参与性质的研究和伦理方法,整合了患者和医疗保健提供者的观点。本文具体概述了五阶段生活实验室项目的初始阶段,从确定问题到探索利益相关者对问题的理解。对患者和临床工作人员进行半结构化访谈,然后采用演绎和归纳编码策略进行定性内容分析。总的来说,我们的研究揭示了心理困扰的概念、患者心理困扰的原因、患者心理困扰的后果、患者心理困扰的缓解因素、特定医疗环境下患者心理困扰的管理以及潜在的改善途径。通过创造一个伦理空间,让患者和医疗保健提供者可以反思和讨论这个问题,这一举措不仅加深了我们对患者心理困扰的理解,而且还在临床环境中启动了范式转变,认识到患者的心理困扰是一个关系到每个人的基本人类问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信