Michela Monaci, Antonia Rake, Marta Acampora, Serena Barello
{"title":"Digital educational interventions for antimicrobial stewardship: A systematic review.","authors":"Michela Monaci, Antonia Rake, Marta Acampora, Serena Barello","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial Stewardship programs (ASPs) help reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by promoting responsible antibiotic use. However, implementation is often inconsistent, especially in low-resource settings. Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide scalable and flexible means to enhance ASPs, particularly through targeted educational interventions for clinicians, students, and the public.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital educational within ASPs by enhancing knowledge and driving behavior change, with a specific focus on the educational strategies employed, their theoretical underpinnings, and their differential impact across populations and settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This review followed PRISMA and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO. A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL) was conducted to identify primary peer-reviewed studies published in English that quantitatively evaluated digital educational ASPs. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized appraisal tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies, conducted in diverse contexts and targeting different stakeholders, were included in the review. All interventions reported positive impacts on knowledge enhancement and behavior change. Engagement-driven approaches, such as interactive modules, real-time feedback, and case-based simulations, were most common, and strategies were tailored to the specific target groups. However, theoretical underpinnings were rarely reported, with only two studies explicitly grounded in behavior change theory. Few studies included long-term follow-up assessments, and most lacked rigorous designs such as randomization. Risk of bias was assessed and varied across studies. The interventions varied widely in duration, frequency, and delivery format, limiting comparability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital educational ASPs show strong promise in improving knowledge and driving behavior change across a wide range of settings and stakeholder groups. Their adaptability, scalability, and user-centered design underscore their potential as valuable tools in the global effort to combat antimicrobial resistance. To maximize their long-term impact, future interventions should be informed by behavioral theory, include follow-up beyond six months, and address contextual needs in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.07.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship programs (ASPs) help reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by promoting responsible antibiotic use. However, implementation is often inconsistent, especially in low-resource settings. Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide scalable and flexible means to enhance ASPs, particularly through targeted educational interventions for clinicians, students, and the public.
Aim: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital educational within ASPs by enhancing knowledge and driving behavior change, with a specific focus on the educational strategies employed, their theoretical underpinnings, and their differential impact across populations and settings.
Method: This review followed PRISMA and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO. A comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL) was conducted to identify primary peer-reviewed studies published in English that quantitatively evaluated digital educational ASPs. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized appraisal tools.
Results: Twenty-three studies, conducted in diverse contexts and targeting different stakeholders, were included in the review. All interventions reported positive impacts on knowledge enhancement and behavior change. Engagement-driven approaches, such as interactive modules, real-time feedback, and case-based simulations, were most common, and strategies were tailored to the specific target groups. However, theoretical underpinnings were rarely reported, with only two studies explicitly grounded in behavior change theory. Few studies included long-term follow-up assessments, and most lacked rigorous designs such as randomization. Risk of bias was assessed and varied across studies. The interventions varied widely in duration, frequency, and delivery format, limiting comparability.
Conclusion: Digital educational ASPs show strong promise in improving knowledge and driving behavior change across a wide range of settings and stakeholder groups. Their adaptability, scalability, and user-centered design underscore their potential as valuable tools in the global effort to combat antimicrobial resistance. To maximize their long-term impact, future interventions should be informed by behavioral theory, include follow-up beyond six months, and address contextual needs in low-resource settings.
背景:抗菌素管理计划(asp)通过促进负责任的抗生素使用来帮助减少抗菌素耐药性(AMR)。然而,实施往往不一致,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。数字卫生技术(dht)提供了可扩展和灵活的手段来提高asp,特别是通过对临床医生、学生和公众进行有针对性的教育干预。目的:本系统综述旨在通过增强知识和推动行为改变来评估asp中数字教育的有效性,并特别关注所采用的教育策略、理论基础以及它们在人群和环境中的差异影响。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA和Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)的指南,并在PROSPERO上注册了一个方案。我们对四个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和CINAHL)进行了全面的搜索,以确定发表在英文杂志上的、对数字教育asp进行定量评估的主要同行评议研究。使用标准化评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:23项研究在不同的背景下进行,针对不同的利益相关者,被纳入审查。所有干预措施均对知识增强和行为改变产生积极影响。参与驱动的方法,如交互式模块、实时反馈和基于案例的模拟,是最常见的,并且策略是针对特定的目标群体量身定制的。然而,理论基础很少报道,只有两项研究明确以行为改变理论为基础。很少有研究包括长期随访评估,而且大多数缺乏严格的设计,如随机化。对不同研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。干预措施在持续时间、频率和交付形式上差异很大,限制了可比性。结论:在广泛的环境和利益相关者群体中,数字教育asp在提高知识和推动行为改变方面显示出强大的前景。它们的适应性、可扩展性和以用户为中心的设计强调了它们作为全球抗微生物药物耐药性努力的宝贵工具的潜力。为了最大限度地发挥其长期影响,未来的干预措施应以行为理论为依据,包括六个月以上的随访,并解决资源匮乏环境中的情境需求。
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.