Comparison of four methods of detection of anti-double-stranded DNA in SLE patients.

Q3 Medicine
Amal H Ali, Hesham M Hefny, Mohammed A Ismail, Amal Khalifa, Hamdy Saad, Ahmed R Radwan, Asmaa M Goda
{"title":"Comparison of four methods of detection of anti-double-stranded DNA in SLE patients.","authors":"Amal H Ali, Hesham M Hefny, Mohammed A Ismail, Amal Khalifa, Hamdy Saad, Ahmed R Radwan, Asmaa M Goda","doi":"10.55133/eji.320307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease. Anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) detection is essential for diagnosis and assessment of disease severity and lupus nephritis. Variable laboratory tests for Anti-dsDNA detection have different qualities affecting the results and the disease diagnosis. This study aimed to compare the performance of four different methods of detection of anti-dsDNA among SLE patients in Sohag Governorate. This Case -control study was done in Sohag University Hospital during the period from March 2021 to June 2022 and included 81 cases diagnosed with SLE according to the ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria for SLE. We compared serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels by different commercially available kits including Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence assay (CLIFT), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot immunoassay results. ELISA showed the highest positivity (75.3%), followed by CLIA (61.7%), dot immunoassay (49.4%) and CLIFT (48.1%), respectively. Combining the four methods of detection, 45.7% of the cases showed positive by all of the four detection methods. Most of the other cases were at least positive in two or three tests. Only 17.3% of the cases were negative by all of the four detection methods. None of the subjects in the control group were positive by any test. In conclusion for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies, ELISA showed the highest sensitivity. However, the combination of more than one method revealed higher sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":39724,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian journal of immunology / Egyptian Association of Immunologists","volume":"32 3","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian journal of immunology / Egyptian Association of Immunologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55133/eji.320307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease. Anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) detection is essential for diagnosis and assessment of disease severity and lupus nephritis. Variable laboratory tests for Anti-dsDNA detection have different qualities affecting the results and the disease diagnosis. This study aimed to compare the performance of four different methods of detection of anti-dsDNA among SLE patients in Sohag Governorate. This Case -control study was done in Sohag University Hospital during the period from March 2021 to June 2022 and included 81 cases diagnosed with SLE according to the ACR/EULAR 2019 classification criteria for SLE. We compared serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels by different commercially available kits including Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence assay (CLIFT), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot immunoassay results. ELISA showed the highest positivity (75.3%), followed by CLIA (61.7%), dot immunoassay (49.4%) and CLIFT (48.1%), respectively. Combining the four methods of detection, 45.7% of the cases showed positive by all of the four detection methods. Most of the other cases were at least positive in two or three tests. Only 17.3% of the cases were negative by all of the four detection methods. None of the subjects in the control group were positive by any test. In conclusion for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies, ELISA showed the highest sensitivity. However, the combination of more than one method revealed higher sensitivity.

SLE患者抗双链DNA四种检测方法的比较。
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种系统性自身免疫性疾病。抗双链DNA (anti-dsDNA)检测是诊断和评估疾病严重程度和狼疮性肾炎的必要手段。抗dsdna检测的可变实验室检测方法具有不同的质量,影响检测结果和疾病诊断。本研究旨在比较Sohag省SLE患者中四种不同的抗dsdna检测方法的性能。该病例对照研究于2021年3月至2022年6月在Sohag大学医院进行,包括81例根据ACR/EULAR 2019 SLE分类标准诊断为SLE的患者。我们采用不同的市购试剂盒,包括间接免疫荧光法(CLIFT)、化学发光免疫法(CLIA)、酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)和斑点免疫法,比较血清抗dsdna抗体水平。ELISA法的阳性率最高(75.3%),其次是CLIA法(61.7%)、dot免疫法(49.4%)和CLIFT法(48.1%)。综合4种检测方法,45.7%的病例4种检测方法均呈阳性。其他大多数病例至少在两到三次检测中呈阳性。4种检测方法均阴性的病例仅为17.3%。对照组中没有一名受试者在任何测试中呈阳性。综上所述,ELISA检测抗dsdna抗体的灵敏度最高。然而,多种方法的组合显示出更高的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信