Lesional volume in the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Bellamy Brodie, Daniel Yang Yao Peh, Yu Guang Tan, Yan Mee Law, Kae Jack Tay, Christopher Wai Sam Cheng, Henry Sun Sien Ho, John Shyi Peng Yuen, Alvin Yuan Ming Lee, Kenneth Chen
{"title":"Lesional volume in the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.","authors":"Bellamy Brodie, Daniel Yang Yao Peh, Yu Guang Tan, Yan Mee Law, Kae Jack Tay, Christopher Wai Sam Cheng, Henry Sun Sien Ho, John Shyi Peng Yuen, Alvin Yuan Ming Lee, Kenneth Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03905-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While MRI has significantly advanced risk stratification in prostate cancer, PIRADS scoring alone is still insufficient to solely determine which patients do not require biopsy. Beyond PIRADS scoring, data regarding lesional volume and number can easily be extracted. This study aims to investigate whether the novel parameter 'Lesional PSAD' is a better predictive biomarker for clinically significant prostate cancer than conventional PSAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 433 patients who underwent MRI Prostate followed by MRI-US fusion trans-perineal targeted and systematic biopsy was performed. Prostate and lesional volumes were calculated using the planimetry technique using MRI files. All PIRADS 3-5 lesions were considered significant. Lesional PSAD was calculated as: [Formula: see text] Statistical analysis with Mann-Whitney U and receiver operating curves was performed for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median PSA at biopsy was 8.5 (6.1-11.64, ng/ml), with a prostate volume of 38.2 (29.2 -54.19, cc), and total lesional volume of 1.49cm<sup>2</sup> (0.65-2.77). Higher conventional PSAD was associated with higher rates of csPCa (0.173 vs 0.282, p < 0.01). Total lesional volume was found to be significantly higher in csPCa cases (1.205 vs. 1.980, p < 0.001). Lesional PSAD was also found to be significantly higher in the csPCa cohort (LPSAD 0.191 vs 0.561, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed better discrimination for csPCa with lesional PSAD compared to conventional PSAD (AUC 0.741 vs. 0.733). Subgroup analysis also favoured lesional PSAD over conventional PSAD in patient under 60 years (AUC 0.728 vs. 0.704).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating lesional volume with conventional PSAD marginally increases predictive accuracy for csPCa, more so in early-onset prostate cancer, potentially aiding in decision-making for biopsy in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03905-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While MRI has significantly advanced risk stratification in prostate cancer, PIRADS scoring alone is still insufficient to solely determine which patients do not require biopsy. Beyond PIRADS scoring, data regarding lesional volume and number can easily be extracted. This study aims to investigate whether the novel parameter 'Lesional PSAD' is a better predictive biomarker for clinically significant prostate cancer than conventional PSAD.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 433 patients who underwent MRI Prostate followed by MRI-US fusion trans-perineal targeted and systematic biopsy was performed. Prostate and lesional volumes were calculated using the planimetry technique using MRI files. All PIRADS 3-5 lesions were considered significant. Lesional PSAD was calculated as: [Formula: see text] Statistical analysis with Mann-Whitney U and receiver operating curves was performed for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Results: Median PSA at biopsy was 8.5 (6.1-11.64, ng/ml), with a prostate volume of 38.2 (29.2 -54.19, cc), and total lesional volume of 1.49cm2 (0.65-2.77). Higher conventional PSAD was associated with higher rates of csPCa (0.173 vs 0.282, p < 0.01). Total lesional volume was found to be significantly higher in csPCa cases (1.205 vs. 1.980, p < 0.001). Lesional PSAD was also found to be significantly higher in the csPCa cohort (LPSAD 0.191 vs 0.561, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed better discrimination for csPCa with lesional PSAD compared to conventional PSAD (AUC 0.741 vs. 0.733). Subgroup analysis also favoured lesional PSAD over conventional PSAD in patient under 60 years (AUC 0.728 vs. 0.704).

Conclusion: Integrating lesional volume with conventional PSAD marginally increases predictive accuracy for csPCa, more so in early-onset prostate cancer, potentially aiding in decision-making for biopsy in high-risk patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

病变体积预测临床意义的前列腺癌。
背景:虽然MRI对前列腺癌有明显的风险分层,但单独的PIRADS评分仍不足以单独确定哪些患者不需要活检。除了PIRADS评分,关于病变体积和数量的数据也很容易提取。本研究旨在探讨新参数“病变PSAD”是否比传统PSAD更好地预测临床显著性前列腺癌的生物标志物。方法:回顾性分析433例行MRI前列腺活检后行MRI- us融合经会阴定向和系统活检的患者。采用平面测量技术,利用MRI文件计算前列腺和病变体积。所有PIRADS 3-5病变都被认为是显著的。病变PSAD计算方法为:【公式:见正文】采用Mann-Whitney U和受试者工作曲线进行统计分析,预测临床显著性前列腺癌。结果:活检时中位PSA为8.5 (6.1-11.64,ng/ml),前列腺体积38.2 (29.2 -54.19,cc),病变总体积1.49cm2(0.65-2.77)。较高的常规PSAD与较高的csPCa发生率相关(0.173 vs 0.282, p)。结论:将病变体积与常规PSAD结合可以略微提高csPCa的预测准确性,在早发性前列腺癌中更是如此,可能有助于高危患者活检的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信