{"title":"ROC analysis determines optimal cutoff and doubtable interval of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index in a multicenter case control study.","authors":"Genggeng Guo, Juanjuan He, Jianwen Liu, Xiaoye Yan, Meng Zhou, Chenmin Wu, Diantian Lin, Zhihan Chen, Qing Yan, Fei Gao, Zugang Xie, Feng Huang, Shengli Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11571-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical practice, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) score of healthy individuals is more than zero. However, the lower limit of the BASMI score range for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is 0, which is inconsistent with that observed in actual clinical settings. Based on findings from a multicenter case-control study, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval of BASMI, thereby providing a reference to facilitate the evaluation of patients with AS.Patients with AS and healthy controls were recruited, and their demographic characteristics were examined. Spinal mobility was assessed by our standardized and trained measurement team. We used the SPSS26.0 statistical software to categorize the pertinent BASMI scores of the patients and healthy controls by age and sex. We subsequently prepared the BASMI ROC curve, calculated the Youden index, and determined the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval. In the present study, 246 patients with AS (patient group) and 246 healthy controls (control group) were recruited. Only three (0.9%) and four (1.18%) individuals in the control and patient groups had a BASMI score of 0, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of BASMI in the general population was 1.5 points, the doubtable value interval was 0.7-2.1 points, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (95% confidence interval, 0.835-0.899; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of BASMI was determined as part of a preliminary analysis.A BASMI score > 1.5 may signal spinal mobility limitations; however, its clinical relevance requires validation against functional and structural progression endpoints.Furthermore, when the BASMI score of an individual range from 0.7 to 2.1, it is crucial to determine whether the individual has AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11571-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In clinical practice, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) score of healthy individuals is more than zero. However, the lower limit of the BASMI score range for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is 0, which is inconsistent with that observed in actual clinical settings. Based on findings from a multicenter case-control study, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval of BASMI, thereby providing a reference to facilitate the evaluation of patients with AS.Patients with AS and healthy controls were recruited, and their demographic characteristics were examined. Spinal mobility was assessed by our standardized and trained measurement team. We used the SPSS26.0 statistical software to categorize the pertinent BASMI scores of the patients and healthy controls by age and sex. We subsequently prepared the BASMI ROC curve, calculated the Youden index, and determined the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval. In the present study, 246 patients with AS (patient group) and 246 healthy controls (control group) were recruited. Only three (0.9%) and four (1.18%) individuals in the control and patient groups had a BASMI score of 0, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of BASMI in the general population was 1.5 points, the doubtable value interval was 0.7-2.1 points, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (95% confidence interval, 0.835-0.899; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of BASMI was determined as part of a preliminary analysis.A BASMI score > 1.5 may signal spinal mobility limitations; however, its clinical relevance requires validation against functional and structural progression endpoints.Furthermore, when the BASMI score of an individual range from 0.7 to 2.1, it is crucial to determine whether the individual has AS.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.