ROC analysis determines optimal cutoff and doubtable interval of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index in a multicenter case control study.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Genggeng Guo, Juanjuan He, Jianwen Liu, Xiaoye Yan, Meng Zhou, Chenmin Wu, Diantian Lin, Zhihan Chen, Qing Yan, Fei Gao, Zugang Xie, Feng Huang, Shengli Zhang
{"title":"ROC analysis determines optimal cutoff and doubtable interval of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index in a multicenter case control study.","authors":"Genggeng Guo, Juanjuan He, Jianwen Liu, Xiaoye Yan, Meng Zhou, Chenmin Wu, Diantian Lin, Zhihan Chen, Qing Yan, Fei Gao, Zugang Xie, Feng Huang, Shengli Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11571-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical practice, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) score of healthy individuals is more than zero. However, the lower limit of the BASMI score range for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is 0, which is inconsistent with that observed in actual clinical settings. Based on findings from a multicenter case-control study, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval of BASMI, thereby providing a reference to facilitate the evaluation of patients with AS.Patients with AS and healthy controls were recruited, and their demographic characteristics were examined. Spinal mobility was assessed by our standardized and trained measurement team. We used the SPSS26.0 statistical software to categorize the pertinent BASMI scores of the patients and healthy controls by age and sex. We subsequently prepared the BASMI ROC curve, calculated the Youden index, and determined the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval. In the present study, 246 patients with AS (patient group) and 246 healthy controls (control group) were recruited. Only three (0.9%) and four (1.18%) individuals in the control and patient groups had a BASMI score of 0, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of BASMI in the general population was 1.5 points, the doubtable value interval was 0.7-2.1 points, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (95% confidence interval, 0.835-0.899; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of BASMI was determined as part of a preliminary analysis.A BASMI score > 1.5 may signal spinal mobility limitations; however, its clinical relevance requires validation against functional and structural progression endpoints.Furthermore, when the BASMI score of an individual range from 0.7 to 2.1, it is crucial to determine whether the individual has AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11571-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In clinical practice, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) score of healthy individuals is more than zero. However, the lower limit of the BASMI score range for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is 0, which is inconsistent with that observed in actual clinical settings. Based on findings from a multicenter case-control study, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval of BASMI, thereby providing a reference to facilitate the evaluation of patients with AS.Patients with AS and healthy controls were recruited, and their demographic characteristics were examined. Spinal mobility was assessed by our standardized and trained measurement team. We used the SPSS26.0 statistical software to categorize the pertinent BASMI scores of the patients and healthy controls by age and sex. We subsequently prepared the BASMI ROC curve, calculated the Youden index, and determined the optimal cutoff value and doubtable value interval. In the present study, 246 patients with AS (patient group) and 246 healthy controls (control group) were recruited. Only three (0.9%) and four (1.18%) individuals in the control and patient groups had a BASMI score of 0, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of BASMI in the general population was 1.5 points, the doubtable value interval was 0.7-2.1 points, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (95% confidence interval, 0.835-0.899; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of BASMI was determined as part of a preliminary analysis.A BASMI score > 1.5 may signal spinal mobility limitations; however, its clinical relevance requires validation against functional and structural progression endpoints.Furthermore, when the BASMI score of an individual range from 0.7 to 2.1, it is crucial to determine whether the individual has AS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在一项多中心病例对照研究中,ROC分析确定了Bath强直性脊柱炎计量指标的最佳截止点和可疑区间。
在临床实践中,健康个体的巴斯强直性脊柱炎计量指数(BASMI)评分大于零。然而,强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的BASMI评分范围下限为0,这与实际临床情况不一致。根据多中心病例对照研究结果,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线确定BASMI的最佳截断值和可疑值区间,为评价AS患者提供参考。招募AS患者和健康对照者,并检查其人口学特征。脊柱活动度由我们经过标准化训练的测量团队进行评估。采用SPSS26.0统计软件将患者和健康对照者的相关BASMI评分按年龄和性别进行分类。随后编制BASMI ROC曲线,计算约登指数,确定最佳截止值和可疑值区间。本研究共招募了246例AS患者(患者组)和246例健康对照(对照组)。对照组和患者组分别只有3人(0.9%)和4人(1.18%)的BASMI评分为0。一般人群BASMI的最佳截断值为1.5点,可疑值区间为0.7 ~ 2.1点,ROC曲线下面积为0.867(95%可信区间为0.835 ~ 0.899;p1.5可能表明脊柱活动受限;然而,其临床相关性需要针对功能和结构进展终点进行验证。此外,当一个人的BASMI得分在0.7到2.1之间时,判断这个人是否患有AS是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信