Danielle Chirumbole, Christian M Parobek, Alex Tai, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Yamely H Mendez, Spoorthi Kamepalli, Christina C Reed, Arthur Ladron de Guevara, Keneshia Lane, Claire Hoppenot, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Michael A Belfort, Jessian L Munoz, Hendrik A Lombaard
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Cell-Free DNA Fetal Fraction in Patients With Prenatally Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Danielle Chirumbole, Christian M Parobek, Alex Tai, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Yamely H Mendez, Spoorthi Kamepalli, Christina C Reed, Arthur Ladron de Guevara, Keneshia Lane, Claire Hoppenot, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Michael A Belfort, Jessian L Munoz, Hendrik A Lombaard","doi":"10.1002/pd.6858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal fraction (FF) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) pathology in patients with prenatally suspected PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a case-control study utilizing a database of pregnancies with suspected or proven PAS delivered between 6/2012 and 7/2024 at a single institution. Pregnancies were excluded if FF was not reported. The primary outcome was mean FF in pregnancies with a final clinical diagnosis of low FIGO grade (no PAS or FIGO1-2) versus high FIGO grade (FIGO3) placenta accreta. Results were reported as mean FF ± standard error of the mean. Adjusted means were also reported after assessing confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 468 pregnancies assessed, 128 met the full inclusion criteria. While the unadjusted mean FF in the low-grade group did not differ from the high-grade group (9.6% ± 0.49, n = 81 vs. 10.7% ± 0.64, n = 47; p = 0.22), the adjusted mean FF in the low-grade group was significantly lower than that in the high-grade group (9.3% ± 0.48 vs. 11.1% ± 0.64; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While FF alone is unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting PAS pathology, NIPT results have the potential to improve the diagnostic precision of other clinical tools for PAS prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1160-1166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal fraction (FF) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) pathology in patients with prenatally suspected PAS.
Methods: This was a case-control study utilizing a database of pregnancies with suspected or proven PAS delivered between 6/2012 and 7/2024 at a single institution. Pregnancies were excluded if FF was not reported. The primary outcome was mean FF in pregnancies with a final clinical diagnosis of low FIGO grade (no PAS or FIGO1-2) versus high FIGO grade (FIGO3) placenta accreta. Results were reported as mean FF ± standard error of the mean. Adjusted means were also reported after assessing confounders.
Results: Of the 468 pregnancies assessed, 128 met the full inclusion criteria. While the unadjusted mean FF in the low-grade group did not differ from the high-grade group (9.6% ± 0.49, n = 81 vs. 10.7% ± 0.64, n = 47; p = 0.22), the adjusted mean FF in the low-grade group was significantly lower than that in the high-grade group (9.3% ± 0.48 vs. 11.1% ± 0.64; p = 0.03).
Conclusions: While FF alone is unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting PAS pathology, NIPT results have the potential to improve the diagnostic precision of other clinical tools for PAS prediction.
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling