Diagnostic Value of Cell-Free DNA Fetal Fraction in Patients With Prenatally Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI:10.1002/pd.6858
Danielle Chirumbole, Christian M Parobek, Alex Tai, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Yamely H Mendez, Spoorthi Kamepalli, Christina C Reed, Arthur Ladron de Guevara, Keneshia Lane, Claire Hoppenot, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Michael A Belfort, Jessian L Munoz, Hendrik A Lombaard
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Cell-Free DNA Fetal Fraction in Patients With Prenatally Suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Danielle Chirumbole, Christian M Parobek, Alex Tai, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Yamely H Mendez, Spoorthi Kamepalli, Christina C Reed, Arthur Ladron de Guevara, Keneshia Lane, Claire Hoppenot, Amir A Shamshirsaz, Michael A Belfort, Jessian L Munoz, Hendrik A Lombaard","doi":"10.1002/pd.6858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal fraction (FF) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) pathology in patients with prenatally suspected PAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a case-control study utilizing a database of pregnancies with suspected or proven PAS delivered between 6/2012 and 7/2024 at a single institution. Pregnancies were excluded if FF was not reported. The primary outcome was mean FF in pregnancies with a final clinical diagnosis of low FIGO grade (no PAS or FIGO1-2) versus high FIGO grade (FIGO3) placenta accreta. Results were reported as mean FF ± standard error of the mean. Adjusted means were also reported after assessing confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 468 pregnancies assessed, 128 met the full inclusion criteria. While the unadjusted mean FF in the low-grade group did not differ from the high-grade group (9.6% ± 0.49, n = 81 vs. 10.7% ± 0.64, n = 47; p = 0.22), the adjusted mean FF in the low-grade group was significantly lower than that in the high-grade group (9.3% ± 0.48 vs. 11.1% ± 0.64; p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While FF alone is unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting PAS pathology, NIPT results have the potential to improve the diagnostic precision of other clinical tools for PAS prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1160-1166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between fetal fraction (FF) and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) pathology in patients with prenatally suspected PAS.

Methods: This was a case-control study utilizing a database of pregnancies with suspected or proven PAS delivered between 6/2012 and 7/2024 at a single institution. Pregnancies were excluded if FF was not reported. The primary outcome was mean FF in pregnancies with a final clinical diagnosis of low FIGO grade (no PAS or FIGO1-2) versus high FIGO grade (FIGO3) placenta accreta. Results were reported as mean FF ± standard error of the mean. Adjusted means were also reported after assessing confounders.

Results: Of the 468 pregnancies assessed, 128 met the full inclusion criteria. While the unadjusted mean FF in the low-grade group did not differ from the high-grade group (9.6% ± 0.49, n = 81 vs. 10.7% ± 0.64, n = 47; p = 0.22), the adjusted mean FF in the low-grade group was significantly lower than that in the high-grade group (9.3% ± 0.48 vs. 11.1% ± 0.64; p = 0.03).

Conclusions: While FF alone is unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting PAS pathology, NIPT results have the potential to improve the diagnostic precision of other clinical tools for PAS prediction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无细胞DNA胎儿分数对产前疑似胎盘增生谱系障碍的诊断价值。
目的:探讨产前疑似PAS患者胎儿分数(FF)与胎盘增生谱(PAS)病理的关系。方法:这是一项病例对照研究,利用一个单一机构在2012年6月至2024年7月期间分娩的疑似或证实PAS的孕妇数据库。如果未报告FF,则排除妊娠。主要结局是最终临床诊断为低FIGO级别(无PAS或FIGO1-2)与高FIGO级别(FIGO3)胎盘增生的妊娠的平均FF。结果报告为平均值FF±平均值的标准误差。在评估混杂因素后也报告了调整后的平均值。结果:在评估的468例妊娠中,128例符合全部纳入标准。而低分级组未经调整的平均FF与高分级组无差异(9.6%±0.49,n = 81 vs. 10.7%±0.64,n = 47;p = 0.22),低分级组调整后平均FF显著低于高分级组(9.3%±0.48∶11.1%±0.64;p = 0.03)。结论:虽然FF在临床上不太可能用于预测PAS病理,但NIPT结果有可能提高其他临床工具对PAS预测的诊断精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信