Maximum-Intensity projection on Non-Contrast CT in anterior stroke patients predicts ischemic core volume after mechanical thrombectomy: A retrospective, feasibility study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-19 DOI:10.1007/s10072-025-08368-4
Gianfranco Di Salle, Dario Luca Lauretti, Giacomo Petrucci, Giacomo Lucchi, Mirco Cosottini
{"title":"Maximum-Intensity projection on Non-Contrast CT in anterior stroke patients predicts ischemic core volume after mechanical thrombectomy: A retrospective, feasibility study.","authors":"Gianfranco Di Salle, Dario Luca Lauretti, Giacomo Petrucci, Giacomo Lucchi, Mirco Cosottini","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08368-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) requires rapid intervention, with ischemic core volume assessment being critical for patients' selection in medical and endovascular treatments. Currently, perfusion CT (CTP) is often used for this purpose, but it requires additional contrast, radiation, and specialized software. This study explores the potential of 8 mm maximum-intensity projection (MIP) reformats of non-contrast CT (NCCT) as an alternative for ischemic core volume estimation. This retrospective study analyzed data from 42 patients with anterior circulation stroke and treated with mechanical thrombectomy between 2021 and 2022. Ischemic core volumes were measured using three methods: manual segmentation of MIP-CT, automated CTP, and follow-up CT scans for final infarct volume (FIV). Correlation and concordance between the methods were assessed using Kendall's tau correlation coefficient, Generalized Linear Models regression, and Bland-Altman plots. MIP-based ischemic core showed higher correlation coefficients with FIV (tau = 0.43) compared to CTP (tau = 0.39). Bland-Altman Analysis showed improved concordance between MIP and FIV, with more regular systematic bias compared to CTP. MIP also demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting ischemic core, suggesting it may be more reliable than CTP for early stroke assessment. MIP on NCCT provides a reliable, contrast- and radiation-sparing method for ischemic core volume measurement in AIS patients, with performance metrics comparable and possibly superior to CTP in predicting final infarct volume. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in larger, prospective cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5193-5202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08368-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) requires rapid intervention, with ischemic core volume assessment being critical for patients' selection in medical and endovascular treatments. Currently, perfusion CT (CTP) is often used for this purpose, but it requires additional contrast, radiation, and specialized software. This study explores the potential of 8 mm maximum-intensity projection (MIP) reformats of non-contrast CT (NCCT) as an alternative for ischemic core volume estimation. This retrospective study analyzed data from 42 patients with anterior circulation stroke and treated with mechanical thrombectomy between 2021 and 2022. Ischemic core volumes were measured using three methods: manual segmentation of MIP-CT, automated CTP, and follow-up CT scans for final infarct volume (FIV). Correlation and concordance between the methods were assessed using Kendall's tau correlation coefficient, Generalized Linear Models regression, and Bland-Altman plots. MIP-based ischemic core showed higher correlation coefficients with FIV (tau = 0.43) compared to CTP (tau = 0.39). Bland-Altman Analysis showed improved concordance between MIP and FIV, with more regular systematic bias compared to CTP. MIP also demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting ischemic core, suggesting it may be more reliable than CTP for early stroke assessment. MIP on NCCT provides a reliable, contrast- and radiation-sparing method for ischemic core volume measurement in AIS patients, with performance metrics comparable and possibly superior to CTP in predicting final infarct volume. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in larger, prospective cohorts.

前路脑卒中患者非对比CT最大强度投影预测机械取栓后缺血性核心容量:一项回顾性可行性研究。
急性缺血性卒中(AIS)需要快速干预,缺血性核心容量评估对患者在医疗和血管内治疗中的选择至关重要。目前,灌注CT (CTP)常用于此目的,但它需要额外的造影剂,辐射和专门的软件。本研究探讨了8mm最大强度投影(MIP)重新格式化非对比CT (NCCT)作为缺血性核心体积估计的替代方案的潜力。这项回顾性研究分析了42名在2021年至2022年间接受机械取栓治疗的前循环卒中患者的数据。采用三种方法测量缺血核心体积:手动分割MIP-CT,自动CTP和随访CT扫描最终梗死体积(FIV)。使用Kendall's tau相关系数、广义线性模型回归和Bland-Altman图评估方法之间的相关性和一致性。基于mip的缺血核心与FIV的相关系数(tau = 0.43)高于CTP (tau = 0.39)。Bland-Altman分析显示,与CTP相比,MIP和FIV之间的一致性得到改善,具有更规律的系统偏差。MIP在检测缺血性核心方面也显示出更高的敏感性,这表明它可能比CTP更可靠地用于早期卒中评估。NCCT上的MIP为AIS患者的缺血性核心体积测量提供了一种可靠的、不需要对比和辐射的方法,在预测最终梗死体积方面,其性能指标与CTP相当,甚至可能优于CTP。进一步的研究需要在更大的前瞻性队列中验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信