Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Complex Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ahmed Mohamed Tawfeek, Ahmed Higazy, Moatazbellah Mohamed Elkenany, Khaled Taema, Hisham Arafa
{"title":"Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery <i>vs</i> Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Complex Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Tawfeek, Ahmed Higazy, Moatazbellah Mohamed Elkenany, Khaled Taema, Hisham Arafa","doi":"10.1177/08927790251360265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mECIRS) <i>vs</i> percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing complex renal stones. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 2022 and July 2024, involving 100 patients with complex renal stones who were randomly allocated for PCNL or mECIRS. The stone burden was determined based on Guy's score using a non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract; patients with Guy's Stone Score of III or IV were included in our study. Our primary objective was to assess grade A single session stone-free rate (SS-SFR) in both procedures after 1 month, defined as no stone residual after a single session procedure. Secondary outcomes included grade A (≤2 mm residual), Grade C (2.1-4 mm residual), and overall SFRs, complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay, and overall cost. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. Grade A SS-SFR revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the mECIRS group compared with the PCNL group (51% <i>vs</i> 32.6%, respectively, <i>p</i>-value = 0.0275). However, the final grade A SFR after auxiliary procedures was comparable (40.8% for the PCNL group compared with 51% for the ECIRS group, <i>p</i>-value = 0.557). The mECIRS showed a less operative and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was 38.77% <i>vs</i> 14.28% in the PCNL and mECIRS, respectively, where it was higher in the former, with a statistically significant value (<i>p</i>-value = 0.006). The mECIRS group experienced shorter hospital stay and comparable cost-effectiveness. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> mECIRS is effective and safe in managing patients with complex renal stones in a single session with fewer comorbidities than standard PCNL. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with a registration number: NCT06085794.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"998-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251360265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mECIRS) vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing complex renal stones. Material and Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 2022 and July 2024, involving 100 patients with complex renal stones who were randomly allocated for PCNL or mECIRS. The stone burden was determined based on Guy's score using a non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract; patients with Guy's Stone Score of III or IV were included in our study. Our primary objective was to assess grade A single session stone-free rate (SS-SFR) in both procedures after 1 month, defined as no stone residual after a single session procedure. Secondary outcomes included grade A (≤2 mm residual), Grade C (2.1-4 mm residual), and overall SFRs, complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay, and overall cost. Results: Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. Grade A SS-SFR revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the mECIRS group compared with the PCNL group (51% vs 32.6%, respectively, p-value = 0.0275). However, the final grade A SFR after auxiliary procedures was comparable (40.8% for the PCNL group compared with 51% for the ECIRS group, p-value = 0.557). The mECIRS showed a less operative and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was 38.77% vs 14.28% in the PCNL and mECIRS, respectively, where it was higher in the former, with a statistically significant value (p-value = 0.006). The mECIRS group experienced shorter hospital stay and comparable cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: mECIRS is effective and safe in managing patients with complex renal stones in a single session with fewer comorbidities than standard PCNL. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with a registration number: NCT06085794.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.