Evaluation of the Safety of Virtual Visits After In-Clinic Botox® Injection: A Quality Improvement Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
K Marie Douglass, Katharina Laus, Samantha DeAndrade, Taylor Whitaker, Tajnoos Yazdany, Christina Truong
{"title":"Evaluation of the Safety of Virtual Visits After In-Clinic Botox® Injection: A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"K Marie Douglass, Katharina Laus, Samantha DeAndrade, Taylor Whitaker, Tajnoos Yazdany, Christina Truong","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06216-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Virtual visits can be performed after in-clinic injection of Botox®, but data are lacking on the safety of these visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a protocol change from in-person to virtual post-procedure visits after in-clinic injection of Botox®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quality improvement study that took place at a safety-net hospital. Initially, all patients undergoing Botox® injection for idiopathic overactive bladder were scheduled for a 2-week in-person assessment after their procedure. Beginning in January 2023, patients were instead scheduled for a 2-week phone visit where they were screened using standardized and validated questionnaires and asked to present for in-person assessment if they expressed worsening or concerning symptoms. Demographic variables, subjective improvement, need for in-person assessment, and rates of urinary tract infection and retention were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven patients in the in-person-visit group and 60 in the phone-visit group were included. There was no difference in subjective improvement, symptoms of dysuria or incomplete emptying, or rates of urinary tract infection or retention between groups. Twenty-eight percent of patients who had phone visits were asked to return in-person, although this did not correspond with a higher rate of complications. The phone-visit group had a 68.3% reduction in face-to-face assessments overall when compared with the in-person group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-procedure phone visits are safe and feasible to perform after in-clinic Botox® injection, and are not associated with an increased risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06216-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Virtual visits can be performed after in-clinic injection of Botox®, but data are lacking on the safety of these visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a protocol change from in-person to virtual post-procedure visits after in-clinic injection of Botox®.

Methods: This was a quality improvement study that took place at a safety-net hospital. Initially, all patients undergoing Botox® injection for idiopathic overactive bladder were scheduled for a 2-week in-person assessment after their procedure. Beginning in January 2023, patients were instead scheduled for a 2-week phone visit where they were screened using standardized and validated questionnaires and asked to present for in-person assessment if they expressed worsening or concerning symptoms. Demographic variables, subjective improvement, need for in-person assessment, and rates of urinary tract infection and retention were compared between groups.

Results: Fifty-seven patients in the in-person-visit group and 60 in the phone-visit group were included. There was no difference in subjective improvement, symptoms of dysuria or incomplete emptying, or rates of urinary tract infection or retention between groups. Twenty-eight percent of patients who had phone visits were asked to return in-person, although this did not correspond with a higher rate of complications. The phone-visit group had a 68.3% reduction in face-to-face assessments overall when compared with the in-person group.

Conclusions: Post-procedure phone visits are safe and feasible to perform after in-clinic Botox® injection, and are not associated with an increased risk of complications.

临床注射肉毒杆菌®后虚拟访问的安全性评估:质量改进研究。
介绍和假设:在临床注射肉毒杆菌后可以进行虚拟访问,但缺乏这些访问的安全性数据。本研究的目的是评估在临床注射肉毒杆菌素®后,从面对面到虚拟手术后访问的协议变化的影响。方法:这是一项质量改进研究,发生在一个安全网医院。最初,所有接受肉毒杆菌®注射治疗特发性膀胱过动症的患者在手术后进行了为期2周的亲自评估。从2023年1月开始,患者被安排进行为期两周的电话访问,使用标准化和有效的问卷对他们进行筛选,并要求他们在表现出恶化或相关症状时进行当面评估。比较两组间的人口统计学变量、主观改善、亲自评估的需要、尿路感染和尿潴留率。结果:现场访视组57例,电话访视组60例。两组之间在主观改善、排尿困难或排空不完全症状、尿路感染或尿潴留率方面没有差异。28%的电话就诊患者被要求亲自返回,尽管这并不与更高的并发症发生率相对应。与面对面的小组相比,电话访问组的面对面评估总体上减少了68.3%。结论:在临床注射肉毒杆菌素®后进行手术后电话访问是安全可行的,并且与并发症的风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信