K Marie Douglass, Katharina Laus, Samantha DeAndrade, Taylor Whitaker, Tajnoos Yazdany, Christina Truong
{"title":"Evaluation of the Safety of Virtual Visits After In-Clinic Botox® Injection: A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"K Marie Douglass, Katharina Laus, Samantha DeAndrade, Taylor Whitaker, Tajnoos Yazdany, Christina Truong","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06216-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Virtual visits can be performed after in-clinic injection of Botox®, but data are lacking on the safety of these visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a protocol change from in-person to virtual post-procedure visits after in-clinic injection of Botox®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quality improvement study that took place at a safety-net hospital. Initially, all patients undergoing Botox® injection for idiopathic overactive bladder were scheduled for a 2-week in-person assessment after their procedure. Beginning in January 2023, patients were instead scheduled for a 2-week phone visit where they were screened using standardized and validated questionnaires and asked to present for in-person assessment if they expressed worsening or concerning symptoms. Demographic variables, subjective improvement, need for in-person assessment, and rates of urinary tract infection and retention were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven patients in the in-person-visit group and 60 in the phone-visit group were included. There was no difference in subjective improvement, symptoms of dysuria or incomplete emptying, or rates of urinary tract infection or retention between groups. Twenty-eight percent of patients who had phone visits were asked to return in-person, although this did not correspond with a higher rate of complications. The phone-visit group had a 68.3% reduction in face-to-face assessments overall when compared with the in-person group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-procedure phone visits are safe and feasible to perform after in-clinic Botox® injection, and are not associated with an increased risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06216-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Virtual visits can be performed after in-clinic injection of Botox®, but data are lacking on the safety of these visits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a protocol change from in-person to virtual post-procedure visits after in-clinic injection of Botox®.
Methods: This was a quality improvement study that took place at a safety-net hospital. Initially, all patients undergoing Botox® injection for idiopathic overactive bladder were scheduled for a 2-week in-person assessment after their procedure. Beginning in January 2023, patients were instead scheduled for a 2-week phone visit where they were screened using standardized and validated questionnaires and asked to present for in-person assessment if they expressed worsening or concerning symptoms. Demographic variables, subjective improvement, need for in-person assessment, and rates of urinary tract infection and retention were compared between groups.
Results: Fifty-seven patients in the in-person-visit group and 60 in the phone-visit group were included. There was no difference in subjective improvement, symptoms of dysuria or incomplete emptying, or rates of urinary tract infection or retention between groups. Twenty-eight percent of patients who had phone visits were asked to return in-person, although this did not correspond with a higher rate of complications. The phone-visit group had a 68.3% reduction in face-to-face assessments overall when compared with the in-person group.
Conclusions: Post-procedure phone visits are safe and feasible to perform after in-clinic Botox® injection, and are not associated with an increased risk of complications.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion