Development and implementation of an etiology-based diagnostic framework for acute abdominal pain in emergency settings.

IF 2.5 3区 生物学
Hui Guo, Xu-Rui Li, Yun-Lei Du, Yang-Juan Jia, Hong-Ling Li, Qian Zhao, Yan-Peng Li, Jian-Guo Li
{"title":"Development and implementation of an etiology-based diagnostic framework for acute abdominal pain in emergency settings.","authors":"Hui Guo, Xu-Rui Li, Yun-Lei Du, Yang-Juan Jia, Hong-Ling Li, Qian Zhao, Yan-Peng Li, Jian-Guo Li","doi":"10.1186/s41065-025-00507-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic checklists have been demonstrated to reduce errors in clinical reasoning. Building on previous validation studies, this research presents the development and clinical application of an etiology-based diagnostic framework for evaluating acute abdominal pain. The framework integrates a structured checklist of abdominal pain etiologies with a process-oriented diagnostic strategy, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes. This approach also serves as a potential model for the creation of diagnostic tools applicable to other symptom complexes encountered in emergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cognitive task analysis (CTA) was conducted with participation from five emergency medicine experts employing a think-aloud methodology. The experts described their diagnostic reasoning processes and queried relevant clinical data to extract foundational diagnostic principles. Based on these findings, a checklist categorizing etiologies of abdominal pain was constructed, drawing from anatomical and diagnostic considerations. The clinical utility of the checklist was evaluated through its application to a representative complex case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic checklist was organized into five principal etiological categories: local organ disorders, diseases of adjacent organs, systemic diseases, psychogenic disorders, and gynecological conditions. Its implementation facilitated the accurate identification of atypical acute renal infarction in a diagnostically challenging case, enabling prompt clinical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTA provides a robust method for modeling expert diagnostic reasoning and supports the development of structured, etiology-based diagnostic tools. This framework enhances diagnostic precision for individuals presenting with acute abdominal pain in emergency settings and may inform the development of similar tools for other clinical presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12862,"journal":{"name":"Hereditas","volume":"162 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditas","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-025-00507-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic checklists have been demonstrated to reduce errors in clinical reasoning. Building on previous validation studies, this research presents the development and clinical application of an etiology-based diagnostic framework for evaluating acute abdominal pain. The framework integrates a structured checklist of abdominal pain etiologies with a process-oriented diagnostic strategy, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes. This approach also serves as a potential model for the creation of diagnostic tools applicable to other symptom complexes encountered in emergency medicine.

Methods: A cognitive task analysis (CTA) was conducted with participation from five emergency medicine experts employing a think-aloud methodology. The experts described their diagnostic reasoning processes and queried relevant clinical data to extract foundational diagnostic principles. Based on these findings, a checklist categorizing etiologies of abdominal pain was constructed, drawing from anatomical and diagnostic considerations. The clinical utility of the checklist was evaluated through its application to a representative complex case.

Results: The diagnostic checklist was organized into five principal etiological categories: local organ disorders, diseases of adjacent organs, systemic diseases, psychogenic disorders, and gynecological conditions. Its implementation facilitated the accurate identification of atypical acute renal infarction in a diagnostically challenging case, enabling prompt clinical intervention.

Conclusions: CTA provides a robust method for modeling expert diagnostic reasoning and supports the development of structured, etiology-based diagnostic tools. This framework enhances diagnostic precision for individuals presenting with acute abdominal pain in emergency settings and may inform the development of similar tools for other clinical presentations.

急诊急性腹痛病因诊断框架的制定和实施。
背景:诊断检查表已被证明可以减少临床推理中的错误。在先前验证研究的基础上,本研究提出了一种基于病因的急性腹痛诊断框架的发展和临床应用。该框架将结构化的腹痛病因检查表与过程导向的诊断策略相结合,旨在提高诊断准确性和临床结果。这种方法也可以作为一种潜在的模型,用于创建适用于急诊医学中遇到的其他症状复合体的诊断工具。方法:认知任务分析(CTA)由五名急诊医学专家参与,采用出声思考方法。专家们描述了他们的诊断推理过程,并查询了相关的临床数据,以提取基本的诊断原则。基于这些发现,从解剖学和诊断的考虑,构建了一个分类腹痛病因的检查表。通过对一个具有代表性的复杂病例的应用,评估了该检查表的临床效用。结果:诊断清单分为5个主要的病因类别:局部器官疾病、邻近器官疾病、全身性疾病、心因性疾病和妇科疾病。它的实施有助于在诊断具有挑战性的病例中准确识别非典型急性肾梗死,从而实现及时的临床干预。结论:CTA为专家诊断推理建模提供了一种强大的方法,并支持结构化、基于病因学的诊断工具的开发。该框架提高了在紧急情况下出现急性腹痛的个体的诊断准确性,并可能为其他临床表现的类似工具的开发提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hereditas
Hereditas Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For almost a century, Hereditas has published original cutting-edge research and reviews. As the Official journal of the Mendelian Society of Lund, the journal welcomes research from across all areas of genetics and genomics. Topics of interest include human and medical genetics, animal and plant genetics, microbial genetics, agriculture and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信