Effects of flow rate on pressure and nephrons during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: an in-vivo pig model.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yao Lei, Huang Xin, Kuang Jin, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin
{"title":"Effects of flow rate on pressure and nephrons during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure: an in-vivo pig model.","authors":"Yao Lei, Huang Xin, Kuang Jin, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01846-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of flow rate on pressure and nephron injury during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent renal pelvic pressure (RPP) control in an in vivo pig model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve kidneys from six female pigs were randomly divided into six groups. Pressure-controlled (PC) and non-pressure-controlled (NPC) groups were continuously perfused at a flow rate of 50 mL/min (group A), 100 mL/min (group B), and 150 mL/min (group C) for 30 min. Color Doppler ultrasound detected exosmosis of the perirenal fluid. Nephron biopsies were performed in the upper, middle, and lower regions. Pressure changes and pathological conditions of the tissue at different flow rates and pressure control values were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RPP values for groups A, B, and C were 8.70 ± 1.02, 20.50 ± 3.03, and 45.97 ± 9.57 mmHg, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant in NPC groups (P < 0.05). RPP values with 10 mmHg control value were 9.43 ± 1.50, 9.97 ± 1.69, and 8.77 ± 1.77 mmHg, respectively. With 0 mm Hg control value, they were 0.40 ± 0.67, -0.40 ± 1.35, and 0.33 ± 1.03 mmHg, respectively, and with - 10 mmHg control value, -9.00 ± 1.34, -11.30 ± 1.15, and - 9.27 ± 1.62 mmHg, respectively. Values fluctuated around the set value, with clinically non-significant differences within 2 mmHg. Pathological examination showed that the nephron structure changed in the NPC group, with more marked changes associated with increasing flow rate. No changes were observed in the nephron morphology in the PC group regardless of perfusion flow rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent RPP control can effectively monitor and control pressure under different perfusion flow conditions and prevent nephron injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01846-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of flow rate on pressure and nephron injury during flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent renal pelvic pressure (RPP) control in an in vivo pig model.

Methods: Twelve kidneys from six female pigs were randomly divided into six groups. Pressure-controlled (PC) and non-pressure-controlled (NPC) groups were continuously perfused at a flow rate of 50 mL/min (group A), 100 mL/min (group B), and 150 mL/min (group C) for 30 min. Color Doppler ultrasound detected exosmosis of the perirenal fluid. Nephron biopsies were performed in the upper, middle, and lower regions. Pressure changes and pathological conditions of the tissue at different flow rates and pressure control values were compared.

Results: RPP values for groups A, B, and C were 8.70 ± 1.02, 20.50 ± 3.03, and 45.97 ± 9.57 mmHg, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant in NPC groups (P < 0.05). RPP values with 10 mmHg control value were 9.43 ± 1.50, 9.97 ± 1.69, and 8.77 ± 1.77 mmHg, respectively. With 0 mm Hg control value, they were 0.40 ± 0.67, -0.40 ± 1.35, and 0.33 ± 1.03 mmHg, respectively, and with - 10 mmHg control value, -9.00 ± 1.34, -11.30 ± 1.15, and - 9.27 ± 1.62 mmHg, respectively. Values fluctuated around the set value, with clinically non-significant differences within 2 mmHg. Pathological examination showed that the nephron structure changed in the NPC group, with more marked changes associated with increasing flow rate. No changes were observed in the nephron morphology in the PC group regardless of perfusion flow rate.

Conclusion: Flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent RPP control can effectively monitor and control pressure under different perfusion flow conditions and prevent nephron injury.

智能控制肾盆腔压力的柔性输尿管镜下流速对压力和肾单位的影响:一个活体猪模型。
目的:探讨智能控制肾盆腔压力(RPP)的猪输尿管软镜检查过程中流速对压力和肾单位损伤的影响。方法:取6头母猪12个肾,随机分为6组。压控组(PC)和非压控组(NPC)分别以50 mL/min (a组)、100 mL/min (B组)、150 mL/min (C组)的流速连续灌注30 min。彩色多普勒超声检测肾周液外渗。在上、中、下肾区进行肾单位活检。比较不同流量和压力控制值下组织的压力变化和病理情况。结果:A、B、C组RPP值分别为8.70±1.02、20.50±3.03、45.97±9.57 mmHg,鼻咽癌组RPP值差异有统计学意义(P)结论:柔性输尿管镜智能RPP控制能有效监测和控制不同灌注流量条件下的压力,预防肾元损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信