Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Patient Phenotypes Associated With Mistaken Treatment Decisions and Adverse Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jing Qi, Zhiqiang Wang, Xiaoteng Ma, Zhijian Wang, Yueping Li, Lixia Yang, Dongmei Shi, Yujie Zhou
{"title":"Latent Class Analysis Identifies Distinct Patient Phenotypes Associated With Mistaken Treatment Decisions and Adverse Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Jing Qi, Zhiqiang Wang, Xiaoteng Ma, Zhijian Wang, Yueping Li, Lixia Yang, Dongmei Shi, Yujie Zhou","doi":"10.1177/00033197251350182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify patient characteristics linked to mistaken treatments and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) using deep learning-based fractional flow reserve (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, DVFFR). A retrospective cohort of 3,840 PCI patients was analyzed using latent class analysis (LCA) based on eight factors. Mistaken treatment was defined as negative DVFFR patients undergoing revascularization or positive DVFFR patients not receiving it. MACE included all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for unstable angina, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Patients were classified into comorbidities (Class 1), smoking-drinking (Class 2), and relatively healthy (Class 3) groups. Mistaken treatment was highest in Class 2 (15.4% vs. 6.7%, <i>P</i> < .001), while MACE was highest in Class 1 (7.0% vs. 4.8%, <i>P</i> < .001). Adjusted analyses showed increased mistaken treatment risk in Class 1 (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.49-2.57) and Class 2 (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.28-2.25) compared with Class 3. Class 1 also had higher MACE risk (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.10-2.12). In conclusion, comorbidities and smoking-drinking classes had higher mistaken treatment and MACE risks compared with the relatively healthy class.</p>","PeriodicalId":8264,"journal":{"name":"Angiology","volume":" ","pages":"33197251350182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251350182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics linked to mistaken treatments and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD) using deep learning-based fractional flow reserve (DEEPVESSEL-FFR, DVFFR). A retrospective cohort of 3,840 PCI patients was analyzed using latent class analysis (LCA) based on eight factors. Mistaken treatment was defined as negative DVFFR patients undergoing revascularization or positive DVFFR patients not receiving it. MACE included all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for unstable angina, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Patients were classified into comorbidities (Class 1), smoking-drinking (Class 2), and relatively healthy (Class 3) groups. Mistaken treatment was highest in Class 2 (15.4% vs. 6.7%, P < .001), while MACE was highest in Class 1 (7.0% vs. 4.8%, P < .001). Adjusted analyses showed increased mistaken treatment risk in Class 1 (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.49-2.57) and Class 2 (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.28-2.25) compared with Class 3. Class 1 also had higher MACE risk (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.10-2.12). In conclusion, comorbidities and smoking-drinking classes had higher mistaken treatment and MACE risks compared with the relatively healthy class.

潜在类分析确定与冠状动脉疾病错误治疗决策和不良结局相关的不同患者表型。
本研究旨在利用基于深度学习的分数血流储备(DEEPVESSEL-FFR, DVFFR)确定与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中错误治疗和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)相关的患者特征。采用基于8个因素的潜在分类分析(LCA)对3840例PCI患者进行回顾性队列分析。错误治疗定义为DVFFR阴性患者接受血运重建术或DVFFR阳性患者未接受血运重建术。MACE包括全因死亡率、不稳定型心绞痛再住院和非致死性心肌梗死。患者被分为合并症组(1类)、吸烟-饮酒组(2类)和相对健康组(3类)。2组误诊率最高(15.4% vs. 6.7%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Angiology
Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A presentation of original, peer-reviewed original articles, review and case reports relative to all phases of all vascular diseases, Angiology (ANG) offers more than a typical cardiology journal. With approximately 1000 pages per year covering diagnostic methods, therapeutic approaches, and clinical and laboratory research, ANG is among the most informative publications in the field of peripheral vascular and cardiovascular diseases. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 13 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信