Serologic and molecular prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Missouri beef herds.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Rosalie A Ierardi, Solomon O Odemuyiwa, Loren Schultz, Zhenyu Shen, Michael Zhang, Shuping Zhang, Ram K Raghavan
{"title":"Serologic and molecular prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Missouri beef herds.","authors":"Rosalie A Ierardi, Solomon O Odemuyiwa, Loren Schultz, Zhenyu Shen, Michael Zhang, Shuping Zhang, Ram K Raghavan","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.03.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Missouri beef cow-calf herds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participating herd owners authorized their local veterinarian to collect and submit serum and whole blood for Anaplasma marginale competitive ELISA and quantitative PCR, respectively, from apparently healthy adult beef cows. Herd owners also completed a questionnaire to describe herd characteristics and management. Meta-analysis of single proportions was performed to estimate within-herd and pooled serologic and molecular prevalence with 95% binomial CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 908 serum samples paired with 757 whole blood samples were received from 59 herds in 34 Missouri counties. Antibodies to Anaplasma spp were detected in 441 of 908 samples, with an estimated pooled seroprevalence of 46.5% (95% CI, 37.9% to 55.3%). Anaplasma marginale DNA was detected by quantitative PCR in 323 of 757 samples, with an estimated pooled molecular prevalence of 40.7% (95% CI, 29.3% to 53.2%). Many producers reported management practices that are likely to increase disease risk, such as reusing needles, not disinfecting castration and dehorning equipment between cattle, and introducing new cattle without testing for common infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subclinical bovine anaplasmosis is prevalent among adult beef cows in Missouri, as it is in neighboring states.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bovine anaplasmosis significantly impacts the welfare and productivity of beef cattle. Our study highlights the need for continuing education of beef cow-calf producers on practices to reduce transmission of anaplasmosis and other infectious diseases in their herds.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.03.0096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in Missouri beef cow-calf herds.

Methods: Participating herd owners authorized their local veterinarian to collect and submit serum and whole blood for Anaplasma marginale competitive ELISA and quantitative PCR, respectively, from apparently healthy adult beef cows. Herd owners also completed a questionnaire to describe herd characteristics and management. Meta-analysis of single proportions was performed to estimate within-herd and pooled serologic and molecular prevalence with 95% binomial CIs.

Results: A total of 908 serum samples paired with 757 whole blood samples were received from 59 herds in 34 Missouri counties. Antibodies to Anaplasma spp were detected in 441 of 908 samples, with an estimated pooled seroprevalence of 46.5% (95% CI, 37.9% to 55.3%). Anaplasma marginale DNA was detected by quantitative PCR in 323 of 757 samples, with an estimated pooled molecular prevalence of 40.7% (95% CI, 29.3% to 53.2%). Many producers reported management practices that are likely to increase disease risk, such as reusing needles, not disinfecting castration and dehorning equipment between cattle, and introducing new cattle without testing for common infectious diseases.

Conclusions: Subclinical bovine anaplasmosis is prevalent among adult beef cows in Missouri, as it is in neighboring states.

Clinical relevance: Bovine anaplasmosis significantly impacts the welfare and productivity of beef cattle. Our study highlights the need for continuing education of beef cow-calf producers on practices to reduce transmission of anaplasmosis and other infectious diseases in their herds.

密苏里州肉牛群中边缘无形体的血清学和分子流行。
目的:了解边缘无原体在美国密苏里州肉牛群中的流行情况。方法:参与试验的畜群主授权当地兽医分别采集健康成年肉牛的血清和全血,用于边缘无原体竞争ELISA和定量PCR检测。畜群所有者还完成了一份调查问卷,以描述畜群的特征和管理。进行单一比例的荟萃分析,以估计群内和汇总血清学和分子患病率为95%的二项ci。结果:从密苏里州34个县的59头牛共获得908份血清样本和757份全血样本。908份样本中有441份检测到无原体抗体,估计血清总阳性率为46.5% (95% CI, 37.9%至55.3%)。通过定量PCR检测757份样本中的323份边缘无原体DNA,估计总分子患病率为40.7% (95% CI, 29.3%至53.2%)。许多生产者报告了可能增加疾病风险的管理做法,例如重复使用针头,不对牛之间的阉割和去角设备进行消毒,以及在没有检测常见传染病的情况下引入新牛。结论:亚临床牛无形体病在密苏里州的成年肉牛中流行,在邻近的州也是如此。临床相关性:牛无形体病显著影响肉牛的福利和生产力。我们的研究强调,需要继续对肉牛生产者进行有关减少无形体病和其他传染病在其牛群中传播的做法的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信