Operationalizing Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) with muscle strength and power: predicting adverse events in older adults from the ilsirente study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hélio José Coelho-Júnior, Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Andrea Russo, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas, Francesco Landi, Emanuele Marzetti
{"title":"Operationalizing Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) with muscle strength and power: predicting adverse events in older adults from the ilsirente study.","authors":"Hélio José Coelho-Júnior, Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Andrea Russo, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas, Francesco Landi, Emanuele Marzetti","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03120-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The present study examined associations between Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) indexes operationalized according to lower limb muscle strength and power and the incidence of adverse events in older community-dwellers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of octogenarians who lived in the mountain community of the Sirente geographic area in Central Italy. Participants completed the SPPB under standardized conditions. Lower limb muscle power was estimated according to results from the 5-time sit-to-stand (5STS) test using validated equations. Then, four SPPB indexes were created by replacing 5STS test results with muscle power measures. Outcomes were assessed 24 months after baseline and included falls, fractures, and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 255 older adults (mean age: 85.8 ± 4.8 years; women: 67.0%) were examined. Binary regression analysis indicated that conventional SPPB was significantly associated with the incidence of falls (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.841, [95% confidence interval [CI]] = 0.758, 0.934), fractures (OR = 0.837, 95%CI = 0.702, 0.998), and death (hazard ratio = 0.961, 95%CI = 0.934, 0.999). However, no significant results were found when SPPB was operationalized according to muscle power parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) results indicated that SPPB indexes had lower accuracy for distinguishing participants at higher risk of negative events.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Results of the present study indicate that conventional SPPB, but not SPPB indexes operationalized according to lower limb muscle power, was significantly associated with the incidence of negative events in older adults. However, SPPB indexes were not good to identify older adults at higher risk of experiencing negative events.</p>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03120-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The present study examined associations between Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) indexes operationalized according to lower limb muscle strength and power and the incidence of adverse events in older community-dwellers.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of octogenarians who lived in the mountain community of the Sirente geographic area in Central Italy. Participants completed the SPPB under standardized conditions. Lower limb muscle power was estimated according to results from the 5-time sit-to-stand (5STS) test using validated equations. Then, four SPPB indexes were created by replacing 5STS test results with muscle power measures. Outcomes were assessed 24 months after baseline and included falls, fractures, and death.

Results: Data of 255 older adults (mean age: 85.8 ± 4.8 years; women: 67.0%) were examined. Binary regression analysis indicated that conventional SPPB was significantly associated with the incidence of falls (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.841, [95% confidence interval [CI]] = 0.758, 0.934), fractures (OR = 0.837, 95%CI = 0.702, 0.998), and death (hazard ratio = 0.961, 95%CI = 0.934, 0.999). However, no significant results were found when SPPB was operationalized according to muscle power parameters. Area under the curve (AUC) results indicated that SPPB indexes had lower accuracy for distinguishing participants at higher risk of negative events.

Discussion and conclusions: Results of the present study indicate that conventional SPPB, but not SPPB indexes operationalized according to lower limb muscle power, was significantly associated with the incidence of negative events in older adults. However, SPPB indexes were not good to identify older adults at higher risk of experiencing negative events.

运用肌肉力量和力量的短体能表现电池(SPPB):预测老年患者的不良事件。
背景和目的:本研究考察了社区老年人下肢肌肉力量和力量的短体能电池(SPPB)指数与不良事件发生率之间的关系。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是居住在意大利中部Sirente地理区域山区社区的80多岁老人。参与者在标准化条件下完成SPPB。下肢肌肉力量根据5次坐立(5STS)测试的结果,使用经过验证的方程进行估计。然后用肌力测量代替5STS测试结果,生成4个SPPB指标。基线后24个月评估结果,包括跌倒、骨折和死亡。结果:老年人255例(平均年龄85.8±4.8岁;女性:67.0%)。二元回归分析显示,常规SPPB与跌倒(优势比[OR] = 0.841, 95%可信区间[CI]] = 0.758, 0.934)、骨折(OR = 0.837, 95%CI = 0.702, 0.998)和死亡(风险比= 0.961,95%CI = 0.934, 0.999)的发生率显著相关。然而,根据肌力参数进行SPPB操作时,没有发现明显的结果。曲线下面积(AUC)结果表明,SPPB指数在区分负性事件高风险参与者方面的准确性较低。讨论与结论:本研究结果表明,传统的SPPB与老年人负性事件的发生率显著相关,而不是根据下肢肌力操作的SPPB指数。然而,SPPB指数并不能很好地识别老年人经历负面事件的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信