Flooding stress influences productivity and modulates biodiversity effects in experimental grassland communities, shaping biodiversity–productivity relationships

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Aleksandar Zhekov, Bérenger Bourgeois, Monique Poulin
{"title":"Flooding stress influences productivity and modulates biodiversity effects in experimental grassland communities, shaping biodiversity–productivity relationships","authors":"Aleksandar Zhekov,&nbsp;Bérenger Bourgeois,&nbsp;Monique Poulin","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Biodiversity loss and increasing extreme weather events disrupt the functioning of ecosystems and thus their ability to provide services. While the interplay among various climatic constraints, diversity and productivity has received increasing attention in the last decades, the role of flooding has been overlooked.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a greenhouse experiment, we manipulated species richness and water regimes to evaluate the influence of flooding on species diversity–productivity relationships. We measured biomass production and partitioned net biodiversity effects into complementarity and selection effects. To link changes in biodiversity effects to underlying mechanisms, we evaluated the contribution of species richness, species identity, functional diversity and community-level traits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Under flooding, biomass production decreased, and biodiversity effects were less frequently positive. By reducing the incidence of positive complementarity effects, flooding promoted a preponderance of selection effects. Flooding further favored competitive displacement by <i>Phalaris arundinacea</i>; balanced contributions to selection effects from all functional groups at field capacity subsided under flooding when <i>P. arundinacea</i> became the single dominant species. As a result, its acquisitive leaf trait attributes contributed more to selection effects and biomass production under flooding, while root traits contributed less to complementarity effects at field capacity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>As an environmental stressor, flooding promoted the dominance of tolerant species and reduced the incidence of complementary species interactions in the experimental plant communities, clearly modulating the linkage between diversity and productivity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Biodiversity loss and increasing extreme weather events disrupt the functioning of ecosystems and thus their ability to provide services. While the interplay among various climatic constraints, diversity and productivity has received increasing attention in the last decades, the role of flooding has been overlooked.

Methods

In a greenhouse experiment, we manipulated species richness and water regimes to evaluate the influence of flooding on species diversity–productivity relationships. We measured biomass production and partitioned net biodiversity effects into complementarity and selection effects. To link changes in biodiversity effects to underlying mechanisms, we evaluated the contribution of species richness, species identity, functional diversity and community-level traits.

Results

Under flooding, biomass production decreased, and biodiversity effects were less frequently positive. By reducing the incidence of positive complementarity effects, flooding promoted a preponderance of selection effects. Flooding further favored competitive displacement by Phalaris arundinacea; balanced contributions to selection effects from all functional groups at field capacity subsided under flooding when P. arundinacea became the single dominant species. As a result, its acquisitive leaf trait attributes contributed more to selection effects and biomass production under flooding, while root traits contributed less to complementarity effects at field capacity.

Conclusions

As an environmental stressor, flooding promoted the dominance of tolerant species and reduced the incidence of complementary species interactions in the experimental plant communities, clearly modulating the linkage between diversity and productivity.

洪涝胁迫影响实验草地群落生产力,调节生物多样性效应,形成生物多样性-生产力关系。
前提:生物多样性丧失和日益增多的极端天气事件破坏了生态系统的功能,从而破坏了它们提供服务的能力。在过去的几十年里,各种气候限制、多样性和生产力之间的相互作用越来越受到关注,而洪水的作用却被忽视了。方法:在温室试验中,通过控制物种丰富度和水分状况来评估洪水对物种多样性-生产力关系的影响。我们测量了生物量产量,并将净生物多样性效应划分为互补效应和选择效应。从物种丰富度、物种身份、功能多样性和群落水平性状等方面分析了生物多样性效应的变化及其机制。结果:洪涝灾害导致生物产量下降,生物多样性正效应较少。通过减少正互补效应的发生率,洪水促进了选择效应的优势。洪水进一步有利于Phalaris arundinacea的竞争性迁移;当黄花蒿成为单一优势种时,各功能群对田间容量选择效应的平衡贡献减弱。结果表明,在洪涝条件下,其获得性叶片性状对选择效应和生物量产量的贡献较大,而根系性状对田间容量互补效应的贡献较小。结论:洪水作为一种环境胁迫源,促进了实验植物群落中耐受性物种的优势地位,降低了互补物种相互作用的发生率,明显调节了多样性与生产力之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信