Plasma GFAP and Amyloid Pathology Predict Cognitive Response to Multidomain Interventions in MCI.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Myung-Hoon Han, Mina Hwang, Hyuk Sung Kwon, So Young Moon, Yoo Kyoung Park, Jee Hyang Jeong, Seong Hye Choi, Seong-Ho Koh
{"title":"Plasma GFAP and Amyloid Pathology Predict Cognitive Response to Multidomain Interventions in MCI.","authors":"Myung-Hoon Han, Mina Hwang, Hyuk Sung Kwon, So Young Moon, Yoo Kyoung Park, Jee Hyang Jeong, Seong Hye Choi, Seong-Ho Koh","doi":"10.14336/AD.2025.0646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited evidence on which biological markers can predict the effectiveness of interventions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, particularly in relation to amyloid pathology. This study aims to investigate whether plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels can serve as a predictive biomarker for short-term cognitive response to multidomain interventions in elderly individuals with MCI, stratified by probable amyloid-β plaque deposition. In this 24-week multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT; SUPERBRAIN-MEET), 300 elderly participants with MCI were enrolled. Probable amyloid status was determined using a plasma phosphorylated tau 181 cutoffs derived from a validated cohort. Multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess the association between plasma GFAP levels and percentage changes in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scores, stratified by amyloid deposition status and intervention group. Higher plasma GFAP levels at baseline and 6 months were independently and significantly associated with smaller percentage improvements in RBANS scores over 6 months. Among participants with probable amyloid positivity who underwent the multidomain intervention, increased baseline GFAP levels were significantly associated with reduced cognitive improvement compared to those with lower levels (β = -8.661, p = 0.040). This post hoc exploratory subanalysis, based on data from a multicenter RCT, suggests that plasma GFAP may serve as a biomarker for early cognitive stage transitions in elderly individuals with MCI. Baseline GFAP levels-particularly among those with probable amyloid pathology-may help predict cognitive responsiveness to multidomain interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7434,"journal":{"name":"Aging and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2025.0646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited evidence on which biological markers can predict the effectiveness of interventions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, particularly in relation to amyloid pathology. This study aims to investigate whether plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels can serve as a predictive biomarker for short-term cognitive response to multidomain interventions in elderly individuals with MCI, stratified by probable amyloid-β plaque deposition. In this 24-week multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT; SUPERBRAIN-MEET), 300 elderly participants with MCI were enrolled. Probable amyloid status was determined using a plasma phosphorylated tau 181 cutoffs derived from a validated cohort. Multivariable linear regression analyses were employed to assess the association between plasma GFAP levels and percentage changes in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scores, stratified by amyloid deposition status and intervention group. Higher plasma GFAP levels at baseline and 6 months were independently and significantly associated with smaller percentage improvements in RBANS scores over 6 months. Among participants with probable amyloid positivity who underwent the multidomain intervention, increased baseline GFAP levels were significantly associated with reduced cognitive improvement compared to those with lower levels (β = -8.661, p = 0.040). This post hoc exploratory subanalysis, based on data from a multicenter RCT, suggests that plasma GFAP may serve as a biomarker for early cognitive stage transitions in elderly individuals with MCI. Baseline GFAP levels-particularly among those with probable amyloid pathology-may help predict cognitive responsiveness to multidomain interventions.

血浆GFAP和淀粉样蛋白病理学预测MCI患者对多域干预的认知反应。
关于生物标志物可以预测轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者干预措施有效性的证据有限,特别是与淀粉样蛋白病理有关的证据。本研究旨在探讨血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平是否可以作为老年MCI患者对多域干预的短期认知反应的预测性生物标志物,并通过可能的淀粉样蛋白-β斑块沉积进行分层。在这项为期24周的多中心随机对照试验(RCT;SUPERBRAIN-MEET),招募了300名患有轻度认知障碍的老年参与者。使用来自验证队列的血浆磷酸化tau 181切断来确定可能的淀粉样蛋白状态。采用多变量线性回归分析评估血浆GFAP水平与rban评分百分比变化之间的关系,并按淀粉样蛋白沉积状态和干预组分层。基线和6个月时较高的血浆GFAP水平与6个月后rban评分的小百分比改善独立且显著相关。在接受多域干预的可能淀粉样蛋白阳性的参与者中,与较低水平的参与者相比,基线GFAP水平的增加与认知改善的降低显著相关(β = -8.661, p = 0.040)。这项基于多中心随机对照试验数据的事后探索性亚分析表明,血浆GFAP可能作为老年轻度认知障碍患者早期认知阶段转变的生物标志物。基线GFAP水平,特别是在那些可能有淀粉样蛋白病理的患者中,可能有助于预测对多域干预的认知反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging and Disease
Aging and Disease GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Disease (A&D) is an open-access online journal dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research on the biology of aging, the pathophysiology of age-related diseases, and innovative therapies for conditions affecting the elderly. The scope encompasses various diseases such as Stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson’s disease, Epilepsy, Dementia, Depression, Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, Arthritis, Cataract, Osteoporosis, Diabetes, and Hypertension. The journal welcomes studies involving animal models as well as human tissues or cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信